27 July 2012, 23:57 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 38
|
c64
Can you play c64 games on a 1200? if so how ? How cost?
Thanks Lee |
28 July 2012, 00:06 | #2 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
|
28 July 2012, 00:07 | #3 |
Zone Friend
|
I had an 060 .. games weren`t full speed
|
28 July 2012, 00:23 | #4 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
|
28 July 2012, 01:10 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: amigaland
Posts: 19
|
MagiC64 is quite playable on 030/50.
|
29 July 2012, 08:03 | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 475
|
Yeah, MagiC64 is the best option for 680x0 users. Nice and fast, and reasonably compatible. On my old blizzard iv 50mhz '030 it was quite usable. About 90% speed when skipping 2 out of 3 frames (which is actually more playable that it might sound). Disabling sound will result in a decent speed up as well.
On my current 40mhz '040 it's full speed with sound using only 1 frameskip and the occasional game will run pretty much full speed without frameskip. An '060 fill give full speed/framerate for most games. I did try it on cd32+sx-1+fast ram some years ago and it ran pretty horribly unless screenmode is set to 1bit color, which made a huge difference. I could even play c64 buggy boy at an ok-ish speed, even if it did look a bit spectrum-esque Ultimately though unless you want to use 1bit color forget it unless you have at least a fast '030 + fast ram. Much like the amiga a c64 isnt the easiest machine to emulate and requires a lot more power than other machines of it's era. |
29 July 2012, 09:28 | #7 | |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 47
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
Ultimately, Amigas aren't great for emulation because of limited CPU speed, and as much as I hate recommending a peecee, I'll do just that |
|
29 July 2012, 09:42 | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 475
|
CPU grunt is definately handy for emulation, but perhaps ironically I often prefer emulators on amiga os (or a variant). There's just something about emulation that feels more "genuine" running under amiga os in my opinion. I always put it down to the apis being very raw, ergo the feel, etc., isnt filtered out the way it might be using some other apis.
Amithlon+OS3.x is probably my favorite system when it comes to running emulators, followed by AROS, then Windows, although the reverse is true when there's 3d hardware involved. Having said this though, it still does fit in with your suggestion that cpu speed is important, even if I personally like amiga based systems for emulation (ie. my "amigas" of choice also have some nice cpu grunt). Incidently Vice is also available for pretty much every amiga based system out there. Runs great on Amithlon/AROS/MOS, but Id hate to try it on a real amiga |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
C64 yourself | s2325 | Nostalgia & memories | 4 | 20 March 2012 00:09 |
c64 .DATS and playing games on the C64 hardware | pubzombie | Retrogaming General Discussion | 22 | 15 April 2011 13:40 |
C64/3D vs C64/3D vs Picasso IV (or both) | alewis | support.Hardware | 19 | 30 November 2006 11:36 |
c64 | Traquer | MarketPlace | 20 | 31 January 2006 11:35 |
C64 on your TV!! | MSC | Retrogaming General Discussion | 25 | 22 February 2005 09:36 |
|
|