29 July 2014, 01:14 | #81 |
Supernormal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
Age: 43
Posts: 1,410
|
|
29 July 2014, 09:13 | #82 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
Quote:
What are you trying to do? Device's boot rom (or KS ROM if mainboard IDE) tells filesystem which device driver ("scsi.device" or "suprascsi.device" or "1230scsi.device" or whatever..) and unit number to use. (Actually device driver tells dos that information and dos forwards it to filesystem handler when it is time to mount all devices) |
|
29 July 2014, 13:16 | #83 |
Registered User
|
i was trying to put pfs3_aio-handler into my blizkick sequence without scsi.device but impossible to boot my CF card...
With scsi.device no prob... i know why now.. thx |
29 July 2014, 17:47 | #84 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
Quote:
(It lists exec residents, many system info programs have similar features but because most of them don't handle linked entries correctly, I decided to write my own than to try to find working one) |
|
29 July 2014, 18:59 | #85 |
Registered User
|
When i sait impossible to boot... it's not the exact thing... it boot normally but can't access the two large partition on my CF Card, two first are shown and booted (HD0 : 500Meg and HD1 : 1,4Gb). Last partitions (HD2 : 10Gb and HD3: 2,9Gb) are not mounted.. because without patched scsi, impossible to access large disk i think. i though pfs3 was able without scsi.device to access all my partitions...
All of this is from my Real A1200/060.. with WinUAE/FS-UAE, it boot and access all each time... Attached reslist with and without scsi and no pfs3 in blizkick. the only difference is : 'scsi.device' ('IDE_scsidisk 44.2 (15.03.2009)..') (Doobrey's scsi.device 44.2) 'scsi.device' ('scsidisk 40.12 (21.12.93)..') (from 3.1 roms) Last edited by Foul; 29 July 2014 at 19:20. |
29 July 2014, 19:46 | #86 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
Lets start from beginning.. Do you mean later partitions (that cross 4G border or are completely outside of first 4G) don't mount if you use blizkick to add pfs3 only? But if you add new scsi device + pfs3 (or scsi device only) it works?
There is not much point to add pfs3 to rom if you also boot from normal HD but it should still work. (btw, do you mean pfs3aio, not official, "normal" pfs3?) |
29 July 2014, 19:55 | #87 |
Registered User
|
Only the HD0 : 500Mb and HD1 : 1,4Gb are mounted if (your latest) pfs3_aio-handler is included (or not) in blizkick without scsi.device
With old scsi.device , no HD2 + HD3 mounted partitions... With new scsi.device, all partitions are mounted. Last edited by Foul; 29 July 2014 at 20:05. |
30 July 2014, 18:23 | #88 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
|
I don't get it.. Why do you want to load it in RAM manually instead of putting it in the RDB and letting the system do it for you?
|
30 July 2014, 18:47 | #89 |
Registered User
|
I mixed scsi device and PFS3 Filesystem...i thought in my head PFS3 included scsi device
|
31 July 2014, 05:07 | #90 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Connecticut USA
Posts: 617
|
Quote:
2. If you want a partition hidden from the OS (using a mountlist to mount it only when you want to access it). |
|
31 July 2014, 11:02 | #91 | ||
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
Quote:
In both situations the handler line in your mountlist/dosdriver points to the handler's location on some OS readable volume. Last edited by Jope; 31 July 2014 at 11:12. |
||
27 July 2016, 18:50 | #92 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Szczecin/Poland
Posts: 424
|
Toni, I have one request: would it be hard for you to provide also a MultiUser enabled build?
[edit] Unfortunately, AROS does not seem to be open source anymore (The AROS repository is running on a password protected SVN server, which means that you need to apply for access to it to be able to collaborate in the development. At the request of Amiga Inc., anonymous read-only access to the repository has been disabled - see here), so hardly anyone can provide such a build, even if it is trivial Last edited by Romanujan; 27 July 2016 at 19:35. |
31 July 2016, 18:16 | #93 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Poland
Posts: 49
|
With the partitions in the FFS and SFS Workbench displays nicely in the information about the device driver and filesystem used (name and version), whereas if you use the PFS, lack of information about the filesystem, it is only displayed the driver scsi.device, does anyone know why?
|
31 July 2016, 21:03 | #94 | |||
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
31 July 2016, 22:55 | #95 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
It could be a shortage of tools Workbench, with other tools like Scout on the File System PFS information is shown, see my screenshot.
Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 08 December 2016 at 00:50. |
31 July 2016, 23:03 | #96 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
To confirm what I suspected OS4.1, "more updated", instead displays without problems the File System Information of the same hardfile PFS, see second screenshot
Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 08 December 2016 at 00:50. |
01 August 2016, 09:13 | #97 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
If I mention OS 3+, it does not include OS4.
|
01 August 2016, 09:55 | #98 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
It Toni, was not the answer for you, i just wanted to show that the Filesystem was correct
|
01 August 2016, 11:00 | #99 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Szczecin/Poland
Posts: 424
|
Quote:
It seems to me the FS support is not too complicated - some randez-vous call at the system initialization + additional parameters stored in the filesystem for each object (file/directory) + some calls to multiuser.library from the filesystem to verify the access rights. I don't know what did the AROS team change in the sources (I will look at them when I have some time), possibly compiling the muPFS-AIO can work 'out of the box'. |
|
01 August 2016, 11:24 | #100 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,502
|
Quote:
Official pfs3 is "plain" pfs3 and can be compiled with sas-c. I probably didn't include mufs support because it does not make much sense in aio version. (very rarely needed) Last edited by Toni Wilen; 01 August 2016 at 14:40. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Install PFS3 ? | Mr B | project.ClassicWB | 14 | 07 May 2021 19:22 |
PFS3 or PFS3 SCSI Direct | xalakibaniou | project.ClassicWB | 105 | 27 July 2013 22:08 |
PFS3 why cant i... | zharn | support.Apps | 9 | 27 January 2013 06:27 |
PFS3 error: INVALID PFS3 COPY !!! WTF? | keropi | support.Apps | 10 | 18 March 2008 22:30 |
Pfs3 | Hewitson | request.Apps | 3 | 22 December 2007 14:32 |
|
|