English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Amix

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 26 March 2020, 21:38   #1
redblade
Zone Friend

redblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 36
Posts: 1,445
Amix Vs Next Step 0.8

Hi.

I was wondering if any one can tell me what ran faster between the first Next box that was released with a 030@25mhz and the A3000UX at 030@25mhz with the same amount of RAM (8MB).

I know that Next had a 4 level grey scale 1120×832 resolution screen (wikipedia, 1120x832x2). Just want to know how responsive the GUI was on Next, my experience with Amix on WinUAE seems to work best when it is running on the 2410 graphics card, maybe the a2024 is good to compare with it.

I wont lie I really do like the screen shots of Next Step 0.8, it really does look professional.

Amix also seems to come with a lot of BSD tools as well.

Thanks
redblade is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:36   #2
gulliver
BoingBagged

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 42
Posts: 2,062
The Next Cube 030@25mhz had a cpu performance of 15 MIPS, and the A3000UX of 25 MIPS. So in terms of raw performance, the A3000UX was clearly superior by a huge margin.

The Cube took a very long time to boot 0.8, while the A3000UX was pretty fast compared against it.

On the other hand, the GUI on the Next was far superior than the Amix one, which was rather rudimentary and lacked the polish, and PostScript capabilities the Next had.

The A3000UX was designed, as many Unix machines of that era, to be run from the Shell, not from its GUI which was viewed just as bonus/accessory. The Next Cube was the black sheep of that era, proposing the exact opposite paradigm.

Amix was not BSD, but a true Unix System V.
gulliver is offline  
Old Yesterday, 11:23   #3
trixster
Guru Meditating

 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 1,579
An A3000UX with 25Mhz 030 delivers 25MIPs...???
trixster is offline  
Old Yesterday, 12:38   #4
gulliver
BoingBagged

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 42
Posts: 2,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by trixster View Post
An A3000UX with 25Mhz 030 delivers 25MIPs...???
We are not talking about SysInfo MIPS here.
gulliver is offline  
Old Yesterday, 18:26   #5
Beska
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary/Canada
Posts: 23
Not a fair comparison. Comparing boot times of an 030 NeXT to an A3000UX is like comparing apples to oranges. They both used different storage devices. The 030 NeXT used a magneto optical drive which was terribly slow vs the hard disk the A3000UX used.
Beska is offline  
Old Yesterday, 19:10   #6
trixster
Guru Meditating

 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 1,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by gulliver View Post
We are not talking about SysInfo MIPS here.
What are we talking about?
trixster is offline  
Old Yesterday, 20:04   #7
Leo24
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Sao Paulo
Posts: 14
Both had a MC68030@25MHz+MC68882@25MHz. I terms of raw computation power, both were the same.
Leo24 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 20:26   #8
gulliver
BoingBagged

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 42
Posts: 2,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beska View Post
Not a fair comparison. Comparing boot times of an 030 NeXT to an A3000UX is like comparing apples to oranges. They both used different storage devices. The 030 NeXT used a magneto optical drive which was terribly slow vs the hard disk the A3000UX used.
True, but then that was what the original poster wanted to know.

These are two different architecture based machines, running two different OSes with two different GUIs.

What the OP proposed was never a fair game.

@Leo24

In raw yes, but raw is never a real case, because you need to take into account all other factors that make a computer, and even then, you would also need to evaluate the benchmark used.
gulliver is offline  
Old Yesterday, 22:03   #9
Gorf
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Munich/Bavaria
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo24 View Post
Both had a MC68030@25MHz+MC68882@25MHz. I terms of raw computation power, both were the same.
I am sure the FastRAM-Interface of the A3000 is much faster than the one of the NextCube.
The NeXT was designed around 86 and only because of production delays it was released in 88/89 .. so it had to work with slower RAM.
Back then a couple of year made a tremendous difference!

probably 110ns RAM (NeXT) vs 80 or 70ns RAM (A3000).
Gorf is offline  
Old Yesterday, 22:16   #10
redblade
Zone Friend

redblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 36
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beska View Post
Not a fair comparison. Comparing boot times of an 030 NeXT to an A3000UX is like comparing apples to oranges. They both used different storage devices. The 030 NeXT used a magneto optical drive which was terribly slow vs the hard disk the A3000UX used.
Hi.
Yes I forgot about the magneto optical drive. I wanted to get peoples opinions and experiences on different 68030@25mhz unix systems. But yes if we can compare Amix to a NeXT Step that ran on a HDD, that would be better.
redblade is offline  
Old Yesterday, 22:19   #11
redblade
Zone Friend

redblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 36
Posts: 1,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorf View Post
I am sure the FastRAM-Interface of the A3000 is much faster than the one of the NextCube.
The NeXT was designed around 86 and only because of production delays it was released in 88/89 .. so it had to work with slower RAM.
Back then a couple of year made a tremendous difference!

probably 110ns RAM (NeXT) vs 80 or 70ns RAM (A3000).
I was amazed when I read the early review and saw that it shipped with 8MB at the end of the 80s. To be fair I also saw an advert for a RAM expansion in 92/93 for the A3000 that supported 64MB RAM, I also thought that was a lot and was targeting a very niche market.

Using SIMMs does make RAM expansion easier.
redblade is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
060 based configuration in winuae step by step honx support.WinUAE 16 26 August 2019 10:49
AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition A1200 / Blizzard PPC Installation Step-by-Step Guide headkase support.WinUAE 22 15 November 2017 07:03
Looking for a step-by-step guide to install BPPC on A1200 in WinUAE headkase support.WinUAE 1 29 June 2016 01:59
LCD Monitor mod (hardware pr0n, step by step) Shoonay Hardware pics 11 16 November 2015 22:13
Step by Step guide for installing WHDLoad and games for complete newbies? daro2096 support.Games 9 11 March 2013 22:59

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.07335 seconds with 14 queries