27 March 2010, 22:09 | #41 |
The 1 who ribbits
|
right !!
time to look for some different ram |
27 March 2010, 23:59 | #42 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,602
|
No.
But a memtest will fail if you didn't set the speed on the EEPROM to the speed it says on the chips. Did you do that before testing? (Run SetXA from Workbench) |
28 March 2010, 06:39 | #43 |
I hate potatos and shirts
|
Bad RAM. Replace the memory stick , no matter what size.
Or run SetXA and lower the RAM speed. |
28 March 2010, 11:16 | #44 |
Amiga freak
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 351
|
I still need to run SetXA if I have kickstart 3.1? I thought this wasn't necessary.
I also used a 16 mb module with kickstart 3.1 , also did a memtest. No problems here. But I configured the card on my old amiga with SetXA with this 16mb module. Is that the reason why I should use SetXA again? Also on kickstart 3.1? I can't find anything about the speed on the chips. It should be 60 ns. Btw, Speedball 2 cd32-version (WHDload) works fine (with 16MB). Last edited by Riempie; 28 March 2010 at 11:25. |
28 March 2010, 22:36 | #45 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,602
|
By not reporting what speed it says on the chips, and by not running the configuration utility for the accelerator (clicking the icon) and set that memory speed (or slower), you are not getting closer to solving the problem.
Responding to your blabber about why you should not click this icon takes longer than clicking the icon, so that would be a waste of time for both of us. I am now unsubscribing to this thread. |
28 March 2010, 22:39 | #46 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
^ Photon makes a valid point there.
Let's see some advice being heeded in this thread, please. |
28 March 2010, 22:53 | #47 |
Amiga freak
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 351
|
Sorry, as I've said. I can't see anything usefull on the chips. And I did run SetXA several times, chaning the speed, etc. I didn't mentioned it, because it's obvious I have to try everything with that program. Never mind btw, I'll stick with my 16mb simm.
|
24 January 2016, 18:11 | #48 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
NECROBUMP!
Add me to the list of people with a Microbotics 1230XA having issues with WHDLoad I've been battling with this for years and only now have been pointed to this thread to see I am not alone. Two things that come to mind: would changing the CPU on the card to another 030 work? The one my card has is marked as "Motorola SC414075RC50" which sounds a bit weird. Would popping in a different, same form factor 030 work/help out? Or just make the card a mess/break it? Another idea I have is to send my card to Bert to see if he can fix the issues with it in WHDLoad. I feel like many of us have this card and it sucks that WHDLoad doens't work on it. It isn't a bad card really, it's only WHDLoad that gives issues with it. |
24 January 2016, 18:22 | #49 |
Missile Command Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 52
Posts: 12,438
|
You could try another ram bar with a different speed. The board supports ram with 40-80ns.
http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/mbx1230 |
24 January 2016, 18:38 | #50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: finland
Posts: 1,837
|
Quote:
>>"SC" prefixes were used by Motorola, and then by Freescale Semiconductor, to mark custom order chips. Motorola and Freescale never published what the differences are between these chips and production "MC" chips. I suspect that SC414075RC50 is just a relabeled MC68030RC50B. |
|
24 January 2016, 18:39 | #51 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
Quote:
Would love to confirm this or if there's a chance to change this CPU for something that would create less issues. Perhaps the CPU is not to be blamed at all. I dunno. My offer still stands, I can lend my board to Bert if he would be interested in fixing compatibility with these boards. |
||
24 January 2016, 18:43 | #52 |
Missile Command Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 52
Posts: 12,438
|
How do you know that? The fastram can give every kind you crazy problems with WHDLoad. I don't think that the Microbotics CPU is the source of the problem. Then you would have general problems with all Amiga programs.
|
24 January 2016, 18:57 | #53 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
I ran tests with the turbocard and NO RAM AT ALL in it. So it isn't the RAM. WHDLoad isn't compatible with this card. If you read through this thread you will also see other people having done tests without RAM on it and yielding the same results. My card has compatible RAM, and it isn't faulty. It wasn't even in the card when tests were made. So the problems are not because of RAM. |
|
24 January 2016, 19:11 | #54 |
Missile Command Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 52
Posts: 12,438
|
Sorry, overlooked the memory part in the other thread. Anyway. You card isn't the only one that causes problems with WHDLoad games. Some 040er cards as well. My ACA 1230 freezes with some games, while the M-TEC 1230 is fine. Though Stingray said that the freezes could be fixable bugs.
|
24 January 2016, 19:31 | #55 |
Lemon Curry ?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denmark
Age: 49
Posts: 4,079
|
|
24 January 2016, 19:32 | #56 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
It's said in this thread too, you don't have to be thread jumping The original poster tested with the card unpopulated and got the same results.
I think WHDLoad as said before is just a very complex software and compatibility with every card cannot be assured because they all work differently. HEnce why I wonder if it is worth trying to talk to Bert about it and offer some help in the way of hardware he can use to test. Maybe there aren't enough MBX users to justify it, dunno. |
24 January 2016, 19:35 | #57 | |
Missile Command Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 52
Posts: 12,438
|
Quote:
|
|
24 January 2016, 19:40 | #58 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,710
|
Quote:
|
|
24 January 2016, 22:34 | #59 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Worksop/UK
Age: 59
Posts: 1,328
|
Quote:
|
|
24 January 2016, 23:36 | #60 |
Amigaholic
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 4,676
|
Main reason I bought a 1230 MKIV and put my M1230XA to bed as it didn't play nice with WHDLoad!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Microbotics Starboard 2 | Loedown | MarketPlace | 2 | 08 January 2010 23:23 |
Question about setXA (Microbotics M1230XA) utility | beltrixx | support.Apps | 2 | 30 June 2009 00:47 |
Troubles booting with Microbotics M1230XA accelerator | thgill | support.Hardware | 12 | 31 December 2008 18:12 |
SCSI HD Bootup/Mounting Problem (Possibly SFS Related?) | CU_AMiGA | support.Other | 22 | 13 June 2007 15:22 |
Problem with Kickstarts [rare problem with faulty scripts in early v1.1 release] | Topgun | project.MAGE | 14 | 08 June 2006 22:19 |
|
|