26 February 2016, 12:42 | #1 |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
Blitz Basic 2 source code
Was Blitz Basic 2 source ever released
|
26 February 2016, 12:48 | #2 |
Total Chaos forever!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterville, MN, USA
Age: 49
Posts: 2,186
|
AmiBlitz is based on the Blitz Basic source.
|
26 February 2016, 12:50 | #3 |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
Yeah im not really getting into anything else untill im happy with basic Blitz 2
I wonder with source how hard it would be to change the syntax to amos. |
26 February 2016, 12:54 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
|
Blitz source code: http://www.david-mcminn.co.uk/blitz-2000/archives/bss/
AMOS2Blitz: http://www.david-mcminn.co.uk/blitz-...s2blitz.readme |
26 February 2016, 12:56 | #5 |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
Ok thanks - To me Blitz just looks like a rip of Amos and I would think the authors knew that so could be intresting change the syntax to Amos
|
26 February 2016, 13:43 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,334
|
Well, once you're happy with Blitz 2, AmiBlitz has many benefits (better editor, excellent include files bundled, inline PPC assembly) but also a number of drawbacks (FPU requirements, OS2+ etc.) if you wanted to move on. It depends on what you're running it on and what your target machine is, but other than better features added, the actual language and usage is the same between Blitz and AmiBlitz. You can have both installed if you need it too, just install them in separate folders and swap over your Blitz2: and Blitzlibs: assignments with a script or something. I have Blitz 2.1, Blitz 2.1 with the Ultimate CD, Amiblitz 2 and Amiblitz 3 all installed and usable.
As for being a rip-off of AMOS, well they're both BASIC and both have libraries of commands orientated towards the Amiga hardware so there's not really much scope for ending up with totally different syntax. They both have their strengths and weaknesses though, and once you get into it and go beyond the hardware access syntax they're very different. Complete, proper OS support is one major difference for example, and one of the main reasons I use Blitz over AMOS. |
26 February 2016, 16:53 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
|
|
26 February 2016, 20:04 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Wales
Age: 46
Posts: 934
|
I been using PureBasic on Mac and know that Version 4 was released for the miggy. Has anyone tried it. Its very fast and good so would imagine beats both blitz and amos ?
|
25 May 2016, 05:07 | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Theresville
Age: 83
Posts: 2
|
Blitz2 source got released a few days ago by Simon Armstrong of Acid:
https://github.com/nitrologic/blitz2 Mark Sibly's response: https://twitter.com/blitzmunter/stat...68841954107393 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[blitz basic] How much amiga-blitz friendly is this? | saimon69 | Coders. Blitz Basic | 105 | 21 April 2022 19:45 |
Somebody teach me to code in Blitz Basic, please!!! | Toni Galvez | Coders. Blitz Basic | 18 | 21 May 2015 00:03 |
Source Code for finished games/demos in Blitz? | diablothe2nd | Coders. Blitz Basic | 15 | 14 November 2012 22:04 |
3D code and/or internet code for Blitz Basic 2.1 | EdzUp | Retrogaming General Discussion | 0 | 10 February 2002 11:40 |
Blitz Basic 2 | LaundroMat | Retrogaming General Discussion | 5 | 24 July 2001 08:10 |
|
|