28 May 2008, 20:37 | #1 |
Targ Explorer
|
Wordworth
Hi all can someone put Wordworth in the zone for me please....
|
28 May 2008, 20:55 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London / Sydney
Age: 47
Posts: 20,420
|
Hmmm, I have these .ADFs:
|
28 May 2008, 21:01 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: taunton.som.uk
Age: 73
Posts: 681
|
i will fill in a gap from DamienD `s list
i have wordsworth 5se |
30 May 2008, 01:41 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
|
|
30 May 2008, 10:59 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden Lund Södra Sandby Revinge
Posts: 28
|
6.0E uploaded to the zone !
" COPY PROTECTION When the program is first started, it asks for the registration number. " Wich seemed to work great with my social security number instead . Should be able to write anything in this uploaded version ! Last edited by martinalexander; 30 May 2008 at 11:05. |
30 May 2008, 16:23 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
|
My copy worked with a simple "123456789"... Still, I uninstalled it when I found out how crappy its PostScript support is...
|
30 May 2008, 16:34 | #7 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,428
|
Why would you want to put yourself through the pain of word processing on an Amiga??
|
30 May 2008, 16:38 | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
|
Quote:
I can't understand why ANYONE would want to put up with Wordworth, though. :P |
|
30 May 2008, 16:47 | #9 |
Targ Explorer
|
Madcrow said "I can't understand why ANYONE would want to put up with Wordworth though."
I had a specific wordworth document that I needed to open..... Also I was surprised to find WW is more responsive than FW |
30 May 2008, 17:36 | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden Lund Södra Sandby Revinge
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2008, 17:39 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
|
|
31 May 2008, 01:27 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
|
|
31 May 2008, 02:23 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 181
|
Been using FW for ages - wrote my degree thesis on it. (If you want to know about channel electron multipliers, let me know)
It still does things that Word won't - indexing, contents, not being stupid about numbering ... And AREXX! Need I say more? |
31 May 2008, 08:10 | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden Lund Södra Sandby Revinge
Posts: 28
|
Thank you, I will try this right now !
|
31 May 2008, 10:31 | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sweden Lund Södra Sandby Revinge
Posts: 28
|
I have tried it now.
Pros: + Slightly easier to place an imgage around a piece of text and make the text go around the imgage + Very fast startup & ending time compared to WordWorth Cons: - Somewhat more messy and difficult to find things than WordWorth Seems to be a great word processor. I have only just tested it for less than 5 minutes, but I already like what I see . Thanks for uploading it to the zone ! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wordworth 6 | antonvaltaz | request.Apps | 14 | 24 April 2011 00:02 |
WordWorth 7 | AlfaRomeo | support.Apps | 2 | 01 February 2010 16:30 |
Wordworth | Dave_wb | support.Apps | 0 | 16 September 2005 15:54 |
Wordworth | Dave_wb | support.Apps | 2 | 16 September 2005 09:50 |
Wordworth | Vicked | request.Apps | 31 | 30 March 2004 14:59 |
|
|