19 July 2013, 21:12 | #1 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
Swap CPU for a cooler running 68030 in ACA630
That is, I'm not "hacking it for speed", just hoping to reduce the heat.
I have the 25MHz version. Is there an identical one with a lower nm mask that will run much cooler? |
19 July 2013, 22:40 | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
you can use one of a higher rated mhz,it should run a bit cooler.
or try to get the last mask 68030 at 50mhz.with gold top.i'll try to remember the last suffice. i think the last one was a revision c 0.8 micron cpga rc component i think it was G40W (F91C) if someone could confirm please. Last edited by roy bates; 19 July 2013 at 22:53. |
20 July 2013, 09:37 | #3 | ||
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
|
Quote:
Quote:
Freescale stopped making 68030 in 2010 and stopped selling them in 2011/12 so you'll struggle to get a new one. |
||
20 July 2013, 10:51 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
what i was thinking was to use a 50mhz part and run it at 25mhz,but you may be right there alexh,i cant find out now anyway.
i may of got that mixed with masks of b and c i did have both at one point(1.0 micron and 0.8) |
20 July 2013, 22:45 | #5 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
So this is the cooler running .8 micron one? And only F91C ones will be cooler, although the MHz doesn't matter? Just to confirm.
|
20 July 2013, 22:51 | #6 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Yep, that's the one! (F91C or G40W mask)
|
21 July 2013, 01:22 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
yes indeedy.
|
22 July 2013, 18:56 | #8 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
This any good?
Edit: well, google says it's 1um process from 1993, so noooope. Last edited by Photon; 22 July 2013 at 19:07. |
22 July 2013, 19:35 | #9 |
Professional slacker!
|
I think any gold 030 will run cooler than the original ceramic one on the ACA630 :-)
|
22 July 2013, 19:50 | #10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
Hmm... really?
|
22 July 2013, 19:57 | #11 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
|
No. The same die will produce the same amount of heat for the same frequency regardless of packaging.
The increased thermal conductivity of the gold packaging will mean that the heat will pass to the heatsink and be dissipated by fan more efficiently but that heat amount will be the same and it still has to leave your A600 case. I guess the CPU *might* be more stable as the heat will be leaving the package quicker. |
22 July 2013, 20:00 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
its a revision b photon,probably 1.0 nm
|
22 July 2013, 21:25 | #13 |
Professional slacker!
|
Well in my experience I changed the 25mhz ceramic part for a 40mhz Gold CPU (sorry I don't remember the mask but I can check my old pics)
It seemed to run cooler although I didn't physically measure the temps, I also ran the ACA ocerclocked to 35mhz and later 40mhz and heat did not appear to be a problem |
22 July 2013, 22:33 | #14 |
Unregistered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 43
Posts: 4,190
|
A lower thermal resistance will mean a lower die temperature, even if the emitted power is the same for the same reason that proper usage of high quality thermal paste will lower the die temperature. The heat sink will have the same temperature in any case though, unless you find a way to change the heatsink-to-ambient resistance (e.g. a fan).
|
23 July 2013, 00:33 | #15 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
This one I think steve?
|
23 July 2013, 00:46 | #16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
Seems Blizzard 1230 MKIV's were shipped with the F91C mask CPUs, I could spend 200EUR on one of those
|
23 July 2013, 01:58 | #17 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
Quote:
yes they did indeed,but that would be looks like you might of got lucky Last edited by roy bates; 23 July 2013 at 02:03. |
|
23 July 2013, 07:53 | #18 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
|
D66C and C74N are both Revision B 1.0um parts. You're looking for an F91C or a G40W 0.8um part.
There is one on eBay now http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MC68030RC3...item56575db68b I know its from China but the markings are consistent with similar one sold on Amibay. http://www.amibay.com/showthread.php?t=20759 |
23 July 2013, 16:21 | #19 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
|
Does its markings also match those of a ship that blasted its way out of Mos Eisley?
Don't know if you've had trouble dealing with Chinese but mine have always kept their whispers. If someone was selling chips out of Far Fetchistan I'd be more suspicious Thanks So now I have 3 sources |
23 July 2013, 17:52 | #20 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
|
If you get one I'd be curious to know if you see any difference in heat.
Is there a thermistor on-board the ACA630 which you can read in software to check the temp? Or is it a finger on the top kind of job? Alex |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWAP - A4000T without CPU for fully working CSPPC | fitzsteve | Swapshop | 6 | 06 March 2012 09:15 |
Anyone changed to 68030/50 in their ACA630 to lower heat? | Photon | support.Hardware | 40 | 15 August 2011 20:32 |
Found nasty bug in 68030 CPU! | Oliver_A | Coders. General | 11 | 13 November 2010 15:39 |
Who can do a CPU swap on a Blizzard 1260? | gklinger | Hardware mods | 10 | 26 July 2008 23:49 |
WinUAE needs a 68030 CPU Option | Exodus | request.UAE Wishlist | 3 | 28 April 2004 10:00 |
|
|