English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 19 July 2013, 21:12   #1
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
Swap CPU for a cooler running 68030 in ACA630

That is, I'm not "hacking it for speed", just hoping to reduce the heat.

I have the 25MHz version.

Is there an identical one with a lower nm mask that will run much cooler?
Photon is offline  
Old 19 July 2013, 22:40   #2
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
you can use one of a higher rated mhz,it should run a bit cooler.

or try to get the last mask 68030 at 50mhz.with gold top.i'll try to remember the last suffice.

i think the last one was a revision c 0.8 micron cpga rc component i think it was G40W (F91C) if someone could confirm please.

Last edited by roy bates; 19 July 2013 at 22:53.
roy bates is offline  
Old 20 July 2013, 09:37   #3
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by roy bates View Post
you can use one of a higher rated mhz,it should run a bit cooler.
I don't think that statement is true. It is my understanding that if it is the same silicon (i.e. the same mask.) it will produce the same amount of heat at the same clock frequency regardless of rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by roy bates View Post
i think the last one was a revision c 0.8 micron cpga rc component i think it was G40W (F91C) if someone could confirm please.
Correct. MC68030RC**C is the last version. They had two mask numbers (G40W and F91C) because they were manufactured at two different FABs.

Freescale stopped making 68030 in 2010 and stopped selling them in 2011/12 so you'll struggle to get a new one.
alexh is offline  
Old 20 July 2013, 10:51   #4
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
what i was thinking was to use a 50mhz part and run it at 25mhz,but you may be right there alexh,i cant find out now anyway.
i may of got that mixed with masks of b and c i did have both at one point(1.0 micron and 0.8)
roy bates is offline  
Old 20 July 2013, 22:45   #5
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
So this is the cooler running .8 micron one? And only F91C ones will be cooler, although the MHz doesn't matter? Just to confirm.

Photon is offline  
Old 20 July 2013, 22:51   #6
prowler
Global Moderator
 
prowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
Yep, that's the one! (F91C or G40W mask)
prowler is offline  
Old 21 July 2013, 01:22   #7
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
yes indeedy.
roy bates is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 18:56   #8
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
This any good?



Edit: well, google says it's 1um process from 1993, so noooope.

Last edited by Photon; 22 July 2013 at 19:07.
Photon is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 19:35   #9
fitzsteve
Professional slacker!
 
fitzsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 6,683
Send a message via MSN to fitzsteve
I think any gold 030 will run cooler than the original ceramic one on the ACA630 :-)
fitzsteve is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 19:50   #10
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
Hmm... really?
Photon is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 19:57   #11
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
No. The same die will produce the same amount of heat for the same frequency regardless of packaging.

The increased thermal conductivity of the gold packaging will mean that the heat will pass to the heatsink and be dissipated by fan more efficiently but that heat amount will be the same and it still has to leave your A600 case.

I guess the CPU *might* be more stable as the heat will be leaving the package quicker.
alexh is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 20:00   #12
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
its a revision b photon,probably 1.0 nm
roy bates is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 21:25   #13
fitzsteve
Professional slacker!
 
fitzsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 6,683
Send a message via MSN to fitzsteve
Well in my experience I changed the 25mhz ceramic part for a 40mhz Gold CPU (sorry I don't remember the mask but I can check my old pics)

It seemed to run cooler although I didn't physically measure the temps, I also ran the ACA ocerclocked to 35mhz and later 40mhz and heat did not appear to be a problem
fitzsteve is offline  
Old 22 July 2013, 22:33   #14
demolition
Unregistered User
 
demolition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 43
Posts: 4,190
A lower thermal resistance will mean a lower die temperature, even if the emitted power is the same for the same reason that proper usage of high quality thermal paste will lower the die temperature. The heat sink will have the same temperature in any case though, unless you find a way to change the heatsink-to-ambient resistance (e.g. a fan).
demolition is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 00:33   #15
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
This one I think steve?
Photon is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 00:46   #16
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
Seems Blizzard 1230 MKIV's were shipped with the F91C mask CPUs, I could spend 200EUR on one of those
Photon is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 01:58   #17
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Photon View Post
Seems Blizzard 1230 MKIV's were shipped with the F91C mask CPUs, I could spend 200EUR on one of those

yes they did indeed,but that would be

looks like you might of got lucky

Last edited by roy bates; 23 July 2013 at 02:03.
roy bates is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 07:53   #18
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
D66C and C74N are both Revision B 1.0um parts. You're looking for an F91C or a G40W 0.8um part.

There is one on eBay now

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MC68030RC3...item56575db68b

I know its from China but the markings are consistent with similar one sold on Amibay.

http://www.amibay.com/showthread.php?t=20759
alexh is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 16:21   #19
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,604
Does its markings also match those of a ship that blasted its way out of Mos Eisley?

Don't know if you've had trouble dealing with Chinese but mine have always kept their whispers. If someone was selling chips out of Far Fetchistan I'd be more suspicious

Thanks So now I have 3 sources
Photon is offline  
Old 23 July 2013, 17:52   #20
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,355
If you get one I'd be curious to know if you see any difference in heat.

Is there a thermistor on-board the ACA630 which you can read in software to check the temp?

Or is it a finger on the top kind of job?

Alex
alexh is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SWAP - A4000T without CPU for fully working CSPPC fitzsteve Swapshop 6 06 March 2012 09:15
Anyone changed to 68030/50 in their ACA630 to lower heat? Photon support.Hardware 40 15 August 2011 20:32
Found nasty bug in 68030 CPU! Oliver_A Coders. General 11 13 November 2010 15:39
Who can do a CPU swap on a Blizzard 1260? gklinger Hardware mods 10 26 July 2008 23:49
WinUAE needs a 68030 CPU Option Exodus request.UAE Wishlist 3 28 April 2004 10:00

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:02.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.11834 seconds with 13 queries