|
16 June 2008, 14:12
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mason, Ohio / USA
Age: 48
Posts: 391
|
ClassicWB - Difference between KS/WB 3.0 and 3.1
Hello folks!
My a1200 currently has 3.0 roms and when I set up ClassicWB, I used Workbench 3.0 discs. But I have been thinking of upgrading to 3.1 roms and just curious if its worth my time to redo ClassicWB and use 3.1 discs when its installing. Whats the difference between the 2 in relationship to ClassicWB anyways? Last edited by thgill; 16 June 2008 at 20:33. |
|
|
18 June 2008, 17:21
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
No difference in functionality on a default ClassicWB install.
You don't have to re-install if you're happy with your setup and have no problems. I'd personally want to be using Workbench 3.1 files though if I'd upgraded to 3.1 ROMS. As for the differences between 3.0 and 3.1, that can be found by doing a search on the internet. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Color difference | Leandro Jardim | support.WinUAE | 3 | 16 November 2012 08:51 |
| Multiboot ClassicWB/3.1 and ClassicWB/OS3.9 | MrGimper | support.Hardware | 4 | 16 September 2010 19:42 |
| What is the difference between... | tonyyeb | support.Hardware | 13 | 21 September 2008 15:28 |
| What is the difference ..... | unclet | support.WinUAE | 1 | 17 May 2006 07:47 |
| A PC demo, with a difference... | P-J | Nostalgia & memories | 3 | 09 October 2002 23:14 |
|
|
