07 October 2004, 10:03 | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 965
|
Quote:
|
|
20 December 2008, 19:34 | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cheltenham/UK
Age: 52
Posts: 312
|
2B board here with Apollo 060 all fine and dandy (no timing fixes) wierd huh?
|
20 December 2008, 19:49 | #23 |
Fantasy Man!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,353
|
|
20 December 2008, 20:40 | #24 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
It's oldpx who doesn't visit these forums any more. I think that effort was just his parting shot.
Seriously, though, the whole question of A1200 motherboard timing issues was explained by Eyetech in this document: http://web.archive.org/web/200010150...0/AMIGA001.HTM They sent me a copy of it when I bought an Amiga OS 2.1 disk set from them. |
22 December 2008, 01:27 | #25 | |
A1200 040 SAM440EP 667
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon / Portugal
Posts: 873
|
Quote:
I have a mobo REV 1D4 but don´t say if it is REV -01 or REV -02 |
|
22 December 2008, 11:50 | #27 | |
Got the C= spark again :)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Thanks for that link, the instructions are very clear. However, there's an ambiguity with the instructions behind that link. In the text, it says that the capacitors E123C and E125C should be removed. BUT in the picture, the resistor(?) E123R and capacitor E125C are marked! Soooooooo.... should I remove E123R or E123C ? I guess it is only the 'C' components that should be removed, but I'm checking here to be 100% sure. Thanks |
|
22 December 2008, 12:20 | #28 |
A1200 040 SAM440EP 667
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon / Portugal
Posts: 873
|
Just when I would remove the capacitors E123C & E125C from my 1D4 mobo I saw that E125R, E125C, E123R & E123C were not soldered on the mobo.
What that means?.. In this case there are no fixings to made or there are another fixings otherwise E123C & E125C? It is possible that are mobo´s 1D4 with timing fixings from factory? |
22 December 2008, 23:12 | #29 |
BlizzardPPC'less
|
Now you got me confused too . I removed the ones that are marked E123R and E125C like the picture suggested. Can someone confirm that's the right way?
|
23 December 2008, 00:49 | #30 |
A1200 040 SAM440EP 667
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon / Portugal
Posts: 873
|
|
23 December 2008, 03:40 | #31 |
I hate potatos and shirts
|
Only the capacitors! don't mess with the resistors or the Amiga will not boot anymore, until you replace them.
|
23 December 2008, 10:06 | #32 | |
Got the C= spark again :)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
And the picture on that webpage is *wrong*: http://www.ianstedman.co.uk/Amiga/am..._mobo_fix.html Thanks, Merry Christmas Mr. Amiga |
|
23 December 2008, 10:18 | #33 |
BlizzardPPC'less
|
It's a few years since i removed the thingies from the mobo (so i might remember wrong!). I must double check which ones we're removed. Well, it's booting and working ok so i must have removed the right ones .
|
23 December 2008, 14:58 | #34 | |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
Quote:
*ahem, well found m8y for all those interested in performing their own little hackery Stedy has indeed got all the info on his site. Have a lookie here its not to difficult in truth, as long as you are not an absolute novice with a soldering iron. as with all things, dont rush in, always check what you are doing with someone, or you may need a new motherboard. |
|
23 December 2008, 16:51 | #35 | |
Got the C= spark again :)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Last edited by Andymiga; 23 December 2008 at 16:57. |
|
23 December 2008, 22:40 | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne/Australia
Posts: 4,400
|
Yes, a very good question....anyone got the answer?
Budgie Rev 01 Budgie Rev 02 The Big Book of HW seems to be saying that the Budgie Rev -02 Release had the XR358 470Ohm resistor removed and an 470Ohm resistor added to pin 43 of Alice. So if you don't have that mod, it must be a Budgie Rev 01? So in summary, if you've got an ID4 and nobody has performed the mods then you've got a MB with timing issues, even if they don't make themselves 'felt' with your particular setup? If all ID4's suffer this 'issue', why were ID4's rated as the favourite MB on EAB, that's just crazy talk? I currently have 2 ID4's, one looks like it's had some work on it done. Although one of them works fine with my 030, the other one won't even boot with it in Last edited by NovaCoder; 23 December 2008 at 23:21. |
24 December 2008, 01:18 | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 46
Posts: 733
|
Hi,
I will make a minor update to the A1200 timing fix webpage over christmas to clarify the removal of resistors and capacitors. Taking the opportunity, here is the relevant section of the A1200 schematic concerning E123 and E125. You can see that E123R/E123C do not connect to any devices to the right of the resistor, denoted by the NC text. The same is true for E125R/E125C. The 7MHz clock and CDAC only connect from Alice (U2) to Budgie. So removing either the resistor or the capacitor will break the AC terminator. This circuit is an AC terminator. It has a time constant of 1.30ns and was designed to remove high frequency components in the signal rise/fall time. Unfortunately the 22pF capacitor adds loading to the 7MHZ and CDAC lines which coupled with the input capacitance of Budgie (10pF?) + PCB trace of maybe 5pF, it increases the signal rise/fall times. The rise or fall time of a signal T = 2.2RC, where T is the rise time in seconds, R = output driver resistance, C = capacitance. Most Commodore ASIC have a 4mA drive capability, which from spending too much time around IBIS/Spice models is approximately a 150 ohm output drive impedance Plugging in the numbers, T = 2.2 x 150 x 37E-12. T= 12.2ns If we remove the 22pF capacitor, either by removing it or the resistor, the capacitive load drops from 37pF to 15pF. The rise/fall time is thus: T = 2.2 x 150 x 13E-12 T= 4.95ns Accelerator cards with logic buffers have a 3-7ns propagation delay added on. This helps to explain why some accelerator cards work better than others. I would need to re-read the A1200 CPU slot design notes to explain this further. All formulas and rationale of driver output impedance derivation came from High Speed Digital Design, A handbook of Black Magic by Howard Johnson, chapter 1. In summary, Removing either E123 R/C or E125 R/C will perform the timing fix and allow your A1200 to work. I modified my A1200 (Rev 2B) many years ago and my Apollo 1240 works fine, before I undertook the modification, it did not work at all with the Rev 2B board and the rev 1D4 board I had intermittent issues. Ian |
24 December 2008, 10:00 | #38 |
Amibay Senior Staff
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cardiff / Wales
Posts: 1,302
|
@Stedy
What can I say, Thank you ever so much my friend. I believe that's cleared that one up for good... Merry Christmas TC |
24 December 2008, 10:11 | #39 | ||
Got the C= spark again :)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://haigh.net/Apollo_crashing.htm Merry Xmas |
||
24 December 2008, 11:02 | #40 | |
A1200 040 SAM440EP 667
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisbon / Portugal
Posts: 873
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why new A1200 accelerator cards suffer timing issues | manic23 | support.Hardware | 8 | 12 April 2013 11:19 |
A1200 rev 2B timing fixes | 8bitbubsy | support.Hardware | 7 | 24 July 2010 21:24 |
A1200 Mobo Timing Issues | BippyM | support.Hardware | 9 | 25 May 2006 19:49 |
Even more sound timing issues... | andreas | support.WinUAE | 11 | 30 November 2005 11:23 |
A1200 timing fixes? | icewizard2k5 | support.Hardware | 2 | 28 February 2005 09:37 |
|
|