31 July 2016, 00:01 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 45
|
vbcc IDE
Hi
Which IDE for vbcc do you advise me to use with Ubuntu (the idea is to use a custom makefile) ? Eclipse 4.6.0 can process my makefile but I've the following error : Code:
23:56:36 **** Incremental Build of configuration Default for project 68kos **** make rom make[1]: vc : commande introuvable makefile:53 : la recette pour la cible « signal/raise.o » a échouée make[1]: *** [signal/raise.o] Erreur 127 makefile:91 : la recette pour la cible « c.lib » a échouée make: *** [c.lib] Erreur 2 23:56:36 Build Finished (took 65ms) Any idea ? |
01 August 2016, 10:44 | #2 |
Natteravn
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Herford / Germany
Posts: 2,500
|
Never used Eclipse myself, so I hope somebody else can help you.
I guess you have to configure the path to the "vc" frontend somewhere. |
01 August 2016, 15:18 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 45
|
Any other IDE to suggest ?
|
01 August 2016, 16:34 | #4 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,269
|
Go into Project -> Properties -> C/C++ Build -> Environment, and add the new VBCC and PATH variables.
|
01 August 2016, 17:18 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 45
|
|
02 August 2016, 13:40 | #6 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 1,801
|
Eclipse is dog slow
Kamelito |
17 November 2016, 21:56 | #7 |
The Grim-Button
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 414
|
I use Sublime Text 3. Under windows and linux.
Works well. Has loads of cool addons. Even a m68k asm syntax. All installed via sublime itself. Once you install its package control system. I created my own vbcc build setting too. |
17 November 2016, 22:46 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,178
|
Emacs, obviously
|
18 November 2016, 05:44 | #9 |
Posts: n/a
|
|
16 August 2018, 21:32 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 193
|
Anyone willing to share their eclipse IDE configuration? … or any other similar IDE config?
|
17 August 2018, 09:09 | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
|
vbcc IDE
|
17 August 2018, 19:54 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 193
|
|
17 August 2018, 19:59 | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
|
|
17 August 2018, 20:13 | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
|
|
17 August 2018, 20:37 | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 193
|
Gotch ya! That I can do, no problem. Codelite (Atom. eclipse and code::blocks) just don't seem to work. My goal is actually to have the IDE with the parsed "includes", etc so you get the nice code completion, type peeking, etc. I thought that codeLite could, from within the IDE, parse the makefile and magically find include paths for code completion, type peeking, etc
With the Raspberry Pi and NetBeans this works great! I was hoping for the same thing with vbcc. |
17 August 2018, 22:05 | #16 |
old bearded fool
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
Age: 56
Posts: 779
|
One terminal for 'vim', another terminal for 'vbcc' compiling?
My screen fits six xterm terminals total in Ubuntu, that beats any "Integrated Development Environment" I've ever tried productivity wise. Usually have one dedicated terminal just to do 'grep -ri -B 1 -A 2 string_to_look_for' in the source tree. |
18 August 2018, 00:20 | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: San Jose
Posts: 653
|
I’m using QtCreator alongside with Bebbo’s gcc.
It is non-invasive to projects and allows to just import a directory full of source into the IDE without going through any complicated setup. Point it at a directory of source and start editing. It can also be setup to support source level debugging via Bebbo’s bgdbserver. The cool thing is that once you setup the m68k gdb as ‘kit’, the editor will understand where to look for the system includes and code completion will work nicely. One downside I left for me: the editor parsing is using clang and does not understand the register names in inline assembly... resulting in editor warnings all over and no code completion for system calls (they all, with few exceptions, use inline assembly for the trampoline functions). |
18 August 2018, 05:48 | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 3,773
|
|
18 August 2018, 09:59 | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Athens/Greece
Age: 53
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Code:
#ifndef LEAN #include <clib/dos_protos.h> #include <clib/exec_protos.h> #else #include <proto/exec.h> #include <proto/dos.h> #endif This fixes the issue on my setup. |
|
21 April 2019, 23:25 | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Minehead / UK
Posts: 608
|
Sorry to bump an old thread but is there any way to trick parsers into knowing to ignore VBCC proprietary directives such as "__chip", as in:
static UWORD __chip copList[] = { blah ... }; Either that, or an IDE that can learn about vbcc and be able to handle it - would be better actually? I've tried Visual Studio Code, CLion and now QT Creator and while they can all cope nicely with the build system to some degree or other (VS Code has been best for me so far), they all get tripped up by that '__chip' and throw a load of IntelliSense errors. I know it's not the end of the world and it doesn't stop things working but it's very annoying. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vbcc V0.9e released | phx | News | 17 | 31 October 2016 21:18 |
VBCC and #include | majikeyric | Coders. C/C++ | 3 | 03 March 2016 15:07 |
vbcc 0.9d | phx | News | 43 | 13 July 2015 19:41 |
From gcc to vbcc. | Cowcat | Coders. General | 9 | 06 June 2014 14:45 |
vbcc: no startup | aragon | Coders. C/C++ | 2 | 16 February 2014 14:52 |
|
|