23 September 2018, 08:47 | #1 |
Bug hunter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 48
Posts: 2,161
|
Fast Sync is better?
Hi Toni,
today I've experimented with NVidia G-Sync + Fast Sync and noticed it's actually better then leaving "Use the 3D application setting" for vsync: WB refresh (emulated Picasso Z3 1080p on a 75Hz display) looks a bit faster/smoother e.g. when dragging solid windows, and in-game input emu lag (almost absent IMHO also with standard G-Sync mode. I personally never perceived lag issues playing platforms and shoot'em ups using g-sync) seems also slightly improved… Does it make sense? Last edited by hexaae; 23 September 2018 at 09:49. |
24 September 2018, 18:28 | #2 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,506
|
I haven't bothered to test but I guess at least in theory fast sync can have better latency.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
G-sync / Freesync support (adaptive sync) | demolition | support.WinUAE | 32 | 01 July 2019 10:57 |
Enabling "fast sync" on A4091 | Damion | support.Hardware | 4 | 23 April 2017 17:34 |
32-bit Fast RAM slower than 24-bit Fast on certain A1200 config | moshy | support.WinUAE | 1 | 24 May 2013 21:55 |
Use of 4MB PCMCIA Fast Flash Memory as Fast RAM in A1200 | nkarytia | support.Hardware | 10 | 16 September 2011 13:37 |
Apollo 1260 32MB FAST or Blizzard 1260 64MB FAST? | prart | support.Hardware | 36 | 19 June 2008 00:23 |
|
|