19 January 2004, 22:56 | #1 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
Emulated Amiga setups AKIRA FREE ZONE!
OUT AKIRA, this is lameulation talk boyo! Go and do something useful. Like read a book. Wash your car. Tell someone to read the FAQs. Finish Monkey Island 2!
If you do emulate, I'm just wondering what configs most of EAB peeps are running around these here parts. Below is my setup, along with all my HDF files. The "system" hdfs are exclusive to their corresponding config, containing different versions of the ClassicWB. The "storage" hdfs get shared by multiple configs and contain software designed for a particular chipset. For instance, the so called A4000 (although it isn't really) setups have all the storage hdfs mounted in workbench as these are the workhorse configs. The lower machines however (A1200, A600) only have the corresponding storage HDF mounted and are JIT free for max compatibility ie used for running games. How do you emulate yours? Last edited by Bloodwych; 19 January 2004 at 23:38. |
19 January 2004, 23:09 | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Age: 62
Posts: 2,395
|
I have tested out HDF configs much, mostly just basic ECS config with 512K Slow + 512K Slow-Fast and KS1.3/1.2 config. Then I booted off of the floppy ADF.
Mostly just looking at older DEMO's and such However, since this is a *lamulation* thread I can't speak of my REAL Amiga's and there configs |
22 January 2004, 21:34 | #3 |
Oh noes!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Neverland
Posts: 766
|
I usally don't stray that far from the AIAB setup anymore.. when my HD went bye bye I didnt have the energy left to redo all the stuff so in with AIAB.
mount my FTP as an amiga HD (WHDLoad, WB Installs, programs, unsorted, caps) The linux setup is pretty much the same, but less AIAB and more problems. The second setup is a500 for caps with interlaced output for TVs The third is CD32 with some minor tweaks for TV output. |
23 January 2004, 00:00 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 97
|
My usual config...
CPU - 68040 (JIT 4MB, const jump, fpu support) Chip mem = 8 MB Z3-Fast = 16MB RTG = 8MB Display = 1024 x 768 x 32 @ 85Hz Full screen RTG Chip Set = AGA, Full Sprites, Cycle exact Blitter etc... Drives : PC DVD Drive, PC Hard Drive, PC Ramdisk, Amiga HDF, Amiga RamDisk, 4x Amiga Floppy Workbench 3.5. Running on... AMD XP 2200+, 1 GB PC3200 DDR Which results in this... Bigger Version www.andysplace.fsnet.co.uk/WBbig.jpg It runs damn fast as well! |
24 January 2004, 00:35 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Ahh lameulaters
|
24 January 2004, 00:42 | #6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Age: 62
Posts: 2,395
|
Quote:
|
|
24 January 2004, 01:04 | #7 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
There is nothing wrong with using both as far as I am concerned, but if you have the real thing and it is setup then thats what I use. |
|
24 January 2004, 01:14 | #8 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
I use both.
andyr, nice little setup. Akira, you just HAD to post didn't you? Finished monkey2 yet? No? Then get to it! |
24 January 2004, 01:46 | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
It's blossomed into a workbench that uses RTG graphics, surfs the internet and plays mp3's. I've also had chance to play with software like Xi-Paint, Diamond Box (V.Good), MakeCD, Wordworth 7 etc... Wordworth 7 is very impressive (and looks great) while MakeCD looks very capable. Voyager runs well enough (I have an adsl connection) but falls down on quite a few sites...hasn't been updated in ages though so any suggestions for something more up-2-date? Load's of Amiga tweaks in the mix as well plus the latest versions of faster, alternative libs and stuff from Aminet makes for a slick and surprisingly stable Amiga experience - even using JIT. I was using it the other day for a couple of hours without any problems. I don't understand the elitist attitude of some people though. When running under emulation, my system feels like an Amiga, behaves like an Amiga, acts like an Amiga and looks like an Amiga. For all intents and purposes, when emulating, it is an Amiga - just running on different hardware. |
|
28 January 2004, 21:49 | #10 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 6,160
|
I've split this thread. The great battle of our time continues here:
The Real Thing vs Emulators MCMXCVIII: The Fight Back |
28 January 2004, 22:42 | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Age: 62
Posts: 2,395
|
Good job Cody, thanks for the split, I've sent another volley over the walls of Jericho in an attempt to fuel the flames of war
|
28 January 2004, 22:43 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Alright, let's make that thread our fighting arena from now on.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emulated Amiga 500 too slow | absence | support.WinUAE | 10 | 31 May 2010 14:29 |
Can you say free AmigaOne computers and free Amiga phones? | Pyromania | Amiga scene | 26 | 16 February 2010 13:49 |
What do I need to do to get my emulated Amiga 'online'? | Peanutuk | support.Apps | 2 | 06 July 2004 18:41 |
Different WorkBench Setups | Paul | Retrogaming General Discussion | 58 | 21 October 2001 23:55 |
|
|