ACA1231 vs M-Tec 1230 vs A630 benchmarks

[alenppc]

I had some extra time so I run some benchmarks on similar 68030 configs:

- Viper 630 + 4 Mb fast 40 MHz 68030, 40 MHz 68882
- M-tec 1230 + 4 MB fast 42 Mhz 68030, 33 MHz 68882
- Aca1231, 41.8 Mhz 68030

Here are the AIBB benchmarks running on the M-Tec:



Sysinfo 1231:



Sysinfo M-Tec 1230:



AIBB modules:

ACA1231
M-Tec 1230
Viper A630

The Aca 1231 is about 30% faster than the similarly clocked CPUs on other cards. Well done, Jens!

[melbourneben!]

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

[Methanoid]

if you read that FIRST graphic... "Higher is better performance"... Nope it isnt. It shows the 1200 with no fastram as fastest when clearly it isn't!

[Bamiga2002]

Yep it's clearly a typo in the program
ACA flies for sure, but no Blizzard 1230 benchmark included?

[alenppc]

I don't have a Blizzard 1230 ... but if someone makes an AIBB module, I will add it to the list.

And as for the statement that the higher number is better: it's true but the logic works backwards. Basically, this shows the configuration card in use to be 4.06 times faster than an unexpanded A1200 in integer calculations, but only 0.82 times as fast as the ACA1231 configuration.