English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware > Hardware mods

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 04 September 2013, 15:12   #21
hooverphonique
ex. demoscener "Bigmama"
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fyn / Denmark
Posts: 1,624
are you currently running at 25MHz? From the photo, it looks like you still have CLK90 modded..
hooverphonique is offline  
Old 04 September 2013, 16:20   #22
alenppc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 910
Yes, this is still at 25 MHz, I left the clock 90 mod, since it according to general reports, it should not interfere with card function regardless of the speed.
alenppc is offline  
Old 05 September 2013, 01:40   #23
SpeedGeek
Moderator
 
SpeedGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Wisconsin USA
Age: 60
Posts: 839
The CLK 90 mod is another "Your mileage will vary" hack. I have also heard some A3640 owners say it does not work @ 25 MHz and it's very easy to move the jumper back to the original connection.
SpeedGeek is offline  
Old 05 September 2013, 10:34   #24
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,337
I had instability on my system until I replaced all the electrolytic capacitors on the motherboard and in the power supply.
alexh is offline  
Old 05 September 2013, 15:35   #25
alenppc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 910
@alexh, this has been done already. I have a stable +5.1V on the +5 rail, with no variation under load.

Today I should be receiving the 7ns 16v8 gals that should (in theory at least) be compatible with my programmer. Finding this to be a big hit and miss. I tried a lot of different (brand new!) chips that the programmer will erase but not program.

I will try undoing the clock 90 and/or changing the crystal once I get the new chips.
alenppc is offline  
Old 05 September 2013, 17:04   #26
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
 
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,337
What about the patch level in your AmigaOS? I've found that the more "custom" patches I have the more unstable my AmigaOS3.x system is.

The last really stable system I had was AmigaOS 3.9 BB#3
alexh is offline  
Old 06 September 2013, 04:02   #27
alenppc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexh View Post
What about the patch level in your AmigaOS? I've found that the more "custom" patches I have the more unstable my AmigaOS3.x system is.

The last really stable system I had was AmigaOS 3.9 BB#3
This is OS 3.9, latest BB4...

Anyway: Making progress...

OK, so I got 7ns 16v8s. Replaced U208, everything works great now. Did a simple overclock (change oscillator) to 33 Mhz, the system run completely stable, for a long while, even under stress. The new MC68040RC40 chip gets barely warm. Nice!!!

Replace U203 with a 7ns chip, the system wouldn't boot (insert Captain Kirk yelling "Khaaaaaan!" here). OK well, this is the next step to investigate... but at least it's stable now, although no Zorro boards attached yet.

Look at these figures:







55% integer performance increase, 16% graphics and 35% floating point.
alenppc is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anyone know what happened to cosmos' blog? wXR Amiga websites reviews 3 25 May 2014 17:03
Cosmos Lord Riton project.Amiga Game Factory 5 11 February 2011 21:40
Really Pleased I Didn't Part With A4000 Chips Loedown support.Hardware 5 19 February 2010 00:13
Strange A4000 kicksart rom chips and EC030 cpu card with mmu? keropi support.Hardware 5 01 August 2006 09:26

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:34.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.45414 seconds with 13 queries