31 July 2019, 22:55 | #61 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Umeå
Age: 43
Posts: 925
|
Upgrade to 3.1.4.1 and add the argument NODRIVELEDPATCH to the SetPatch command in your S:Startup-Sequence.
|
01 August 2019, 09:40 | #62 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Sandusky
Posts: 942
|
Not related to SetPatch, but is something wrong with your system clock? "wait 10" taking 10.16 seconds to complete seems incredibly wrong. Then again maybe the stock wait command isis just really badly written. The reason I wonder about your system clock is because the error seems to scale with the length of time you're running wait. It's almost as if the system clock and system bus crystal are mismatched.
|
01 August 2019, 18:21 | #63 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Umeå
Age: 43
Posts: 925
|
Quote:
Wait can only guarantee that execution takes at least the time you specify. Also, as this is a multitasking system, the execution time of a command will vary somewhat. So you should always expect a greater execution time of Wait than the time you specified. With that said, it is interesting that the measured time has a greater difference between the wait time specified and the time measured, the longer wait time you specify. |
|
09 September 2019, 14:53 | #64 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 340
|
Ive found this problem too...replaced 314 Setpatch with 3.9 last night....no lag in booting.....020 Furia
|
09 September 2019, 16:59 | #65 | |
BoingBagged
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 46
Posts: 2,358
|
Quote:
The 3.9 setpatch does not apply some fixes and has a few bugs of its own compared to the 3.1.4.1 version. They are not meant to be interchangeable. |
|
09 September 2019, 17:28 | #66 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 340
|
|
10 September 2019, 01:24 | #67 | |
BoingBagged
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 46
Posts: 2,358
|
Quote:
this, but I am not at home to take a look at the changelog (also remember that the 3.9 setpatch is buggy). So, the 3.1.4.1 SetPatch: -Fixes audio.device bad channel allocation (doomsnd.library) -Fixes shell FAILAT bug -Patches gfx/Draw() bug -Patches ExAll() bug -Fixes for graphics/EraseRect(). -Fix for cardres/CardForceChange() -Fixes some return parameters -Tests and fixes UMult64/SMult64 -Fixes a bug in Alert 0x0100000f -It enables proper use of the scsi.device LED -It properly handles the 680?0.library -It properly manages the FPU -It can properly manage the system mathlibs -It allows a 68060 to run and not crash Also NSDPatch was removed as it was rather useless and a lot of dead code went out too. And have in mind that this is what I remember right now, there is for sure more to it. So again, don't use SetPatch from 3.9 in 3.1.4.1. :-) |
|
13 November 2019, 08:30 | #68 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Umeå
Age: 43
Posts: 925
|
Quote:
This should remove the 3s lag. |
|
13 November 2019, 17:18 | #69 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Italy
Posts: 743
|
Is there a solution to let OS 3.1.4 use Fast Ram on Blizzard1230 when mounting RAD disk ?
Sorry if this problem has just found an answer. In that case could you post the link for that ? Many thanks, DanyPPC |
13 November 2019, 19:02 | #70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: digital hell, Germany, after 1984, but worse
Posts: 3,377
|
|
14 November 2019, 07:49 | #71 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Italy
Posts: 743
|
Many thanks, I'll try it.
|
11 April 2020, 03:26 | #72 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 25
|
Noob question: How does one specifically add NODRIVELEDPATCH to the Setpatch command in the 3.1.4.1 s:startup-sequence? I have the following...
SetPatch QUIET NODRIVELEDPATCH ...in my s:startup-sequence, but the lag is still there on 3.1.4.1 boot and a direct call of SetPatch doesn't list any mention of NODRIVELEDPATCH. |
12 April 2020, 15:06 | #73 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Spain
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
setpatch NODRIVELEDPATCH QUIET this should work. |
|
12 April 2020, 16:13 | #74 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: digital hell, Germany, after 1984, but worse
Posts: 3,377
|
Quote:
Just type "Setpatch ?" or use the Version command. Try "Which SetPatch" to see from it is loaded. |
|
13 April 2020, 19:27 | #75 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 25
|
I have Setpatch 45.25 installed - 3.1.4.1 update was successful and I'm seeing the correct number when queried. I switched my startup-sequence to now read:
setpatch NODRIVELEDPATCH QUIET but it seems as though the delay is still there. "Setpatch ?" returns the following: QUIET/S,NOCACHE/S,REVERSE/S,NOAGA/S,NODRIVELEDPATCH/S: Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? |
06 July 2020, 11:49 | #76 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sundsvall
Posts: 37
|
Is it "correct" and "usual" that SetPatch 45.25 consumes about 2.5 MB of fastram on an 3.1.4.1 installation? Running on an A4000 with A3660 and MuLibs 680x0 46.6.1.
I'm also experiencing a ~2-3 second delay when starting, seem to be related to card.resource that fails (According to SnoopDos). I figure this is not present on an A4000 but only on PCMCIA equipped Amigas? |
06 July 2020, 13:21 | #77 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,233
|
Quote:
There may also be other reasons for delays, the drive scan is one of them. |
|
06 July 2020, 13:59 | #78 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sundsvall
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
I've disabled the 060-libraries and without them SetPatch consumes about 80k .. I've only got 16 MB of fastram. So I figure there's something bogus going on in my system? What would the recomended version of 060 libraries to use with A4000, A3660, 3.1.4.1 ? I'm using 46.6.1 right now. http://aminet.net/package/util/sys/Mu680x0Libs Br, Daniel Last edited by Cav; 06 July 2020 at 14:09. |
|
06 July 2020, 16:59 | #79 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,233
|
Quote:
It requires a lot of memory to "cut holes" into the MMU table to make room for some system resources that are not "properly mapped". Thus, what is in your system in terms of third party hardware extensions, and what is the output of MuScan? |
|
06 July 2020, 22:56 | #80 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sundsvall
Posts: 37
|
@ Thomas Richter:
I have a ZZ9000, except from that nothing but the A3660. MuScan 46.1 (02.07.2016) © THOR 68060 MMU detected. MMU page size is 0x1000 bytes. Memory map: 0x00000000 - 0x001FFFFF CacheInhibit Imprecise NonSerial 0x00200000 - 0x00BBFFFF Blank 0x00BC0000 - 0x00BFFFFF CacheInhibit I/O space 0x00C00000 - 0x00D7FFFF Blank 0x00D80000 - 0x00DFFFFF CacheInhibit I/O space 0x00E00000 - 0x00EFFFFF Blank 0x00F00000 - 0x00F7FFFF CacheInhibit 0x00F80000 - 0x00FFFFFF ROM CopyBack Remapped to 0x07F7C000 0x01000000 - 0x06FFFFFF Blank 0x07000000 - 0x07F7BFFF CopyBack 0x07F7C000 - 0x07FFBFFF ROM CopyBack 0x07FFC000 - 0x07FFFFFF CopyBack 0x08000000 - 0x3FFFFFFF Blank 0x40000000 - 0x4FFFFFFF CacheInhibit I/O space 0x50000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF Blank PROCESSOR: CPU 68060/68882fpu/68060mmu CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8) VERS: Kickstart version 46.143, Exec version 46.45, Disk version 45.194 RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $7000000-$7FFFFFF (16.0 meg) Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $4000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg) BOARDS: Board (unidentified): Prod=28014/4($6D6E/$4) (@$40000000, size 256meg, subsize same) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SetPatch / CacheControl() | dissident | Coders. System | 17 | 04 March 2018 17:01 |
Setpatch 3.9 Romupdate Yes or No ? | Nibbler | support.Hardware | 0 | 06 February 2015 22:31 |
setpatch option | andreas | request.UAE Wishlist | 4 | 13 August 2008 16:21 |
SetPatch: Unloading possible? | mrleeman | support.Apps | 1 | 21 July 2008 10:06 |
where can i find setpatch 44.38 | turrican3 | request.Apps | 5 | 07 May 2007 19:46 |
|
|