HRTmon on real Amiga

Giants · 31 December 2017, 18:38

Hi !

I would like to make it work HRTmon on a realAmiga or winUAE with NO 1mega of Chip.
So, only 512 of Chip or 512Chip+512slow

But, HRTmon seems working only with minimum of 1Mega of Chip (and NO slow ram, it's hated slow ram, LOL)

Maybe the solution is to modify some information in HRTmon ?
Maybe it's impossible.

I thought create a kickstart version with hrtmon in it and, working with 512 of chip only or 512Chip+512Slow

But, I do not know if it's possible and if it is, how to do it.

Mrz · 31 December 2017, 20:58

surely is impossible to add 512k chip support
for those A500 machines is far better to get an Action replay instead

Giants · 01 January 2018, 00:08

I use already MKIII
But sometimes, on certain cases, hrtmon is more relevant.

jotd · 01 January 2018, 01:00

Agreed with Mrz (I wouldn't say impossible since we have the source code, but probably difficult). And HRTMon is good but relies on VBR to break so not on 68000. ARIII is way more powerful because it's less detectable and has a better capability to snoop the write-only values of HW regs from the bus.

what are the HRTMon features you're missing from ARIII ?

Giants · 04 January 2018, 11:56

Arg... sh...

sometimes disassembly code is more understandable with HRTmon.

Example in tuto of R-Type 2 Crack.
With MKIII we can see Something weird in trackloader game code and, if we search we find why. With HRTmon is easier to see why the code is strange. <br />

But actually, I only needed HRTmon on the R-type tutorial and it's always possible to do without, only with MKIII (but a bit more complex).

But i agree, MKIII is better.
I had and have the cartdridge, it's a amazing cartdridge.

31 December 2017, 18:38	#1
Giants Registered User Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: france Posts: 109	HRTmon on real Amiga Hi ! I would like to make it work HRTmon on a realAmiga or winUAE with NO 1mega of Chip. So, only 512 of Chip or 512Chip+512slow But, HRTmon seems working only with minimum of 1Mega of Chip (and NO slow ram, it's hated slow ram, LOL) Maybe the solution is to modify some information in HRTmon ? Maybe it's impossible. I thought create a kickstart version with hrtmon in it and, working with 512 of chip only or 512Chip+512Slow But, I do not know if it's possible and if it is, how to do it.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ROMable HRTMon - looking for	amigoun	Coders. General	19	08 March 2021 08:50
Guru when booting a real wb image form an real Amiga.	chocsplease	support.WinUAE	2	26 July 2017 16:01
HrtMon - wish it has ...	amigoun	support.Apps	8	25 May 2016 10:25
HRTmon known to work?	Apollo	support.FS-UAE	2	15 October 2013 15:55
HRTmon	metalrules	support.WinUAE	2	30 August 2006 18:53

31 December 2017, 20:58	#2
Mrz Banned Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: I Posts: 338	surely is impossible to add 512k chip support for those A500 machines is far better to get an Action replay instead

01 January 2018, 00:08	#3
Giants Registered User Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: france Posts: 109	I use already MKIII But sometimes, on certain cases, hrtmon is more relevant.

01 January 2018, 01:00	#4
jotd This cat is no more Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: FRANCE Age: 52 Posts: 8,161	Agreed with Mrz (I wouldn't say impossible since we have the source code, but probably difficult). And HRTMon is good but relies on VBR to break so not on 68000. ARIII is way more powerful because it's less detectable and has a better capability to snoop the write-only values of HW regs from the bus. what are the HRTMon features you're missing from ARIII ?

04 January 2018, 11:56	#5
Giants Registered User Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: france Posts: 109	Arg... sh... sometimes disassembly code is more understandable with HRTmon. Example in tuto of R-Type 2 Crack. With MKIII we can see Something weird in trackloader game code and, if we search we find why. With HRTmon is easier to see why the code is strange. <br /> But actually, I only needed HRTmon on the R-type tutorial and it's always possible to do without, only with MKIII (but a bit more complex). But i agree, MKIII is better. I had and have the cartdridge, it's a amazing cartdridge.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)