04 September 2010, 09:06 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
030 cpu with fpu: Sync or Async?
To sync or async?
I have this accelerator: http://www.amiga-hardware.com/showha...cgi?HARDID=149 It's a blizzard mkII 030/40mhz with 50mhz 68882. What's the difference if I have both oscillators running at 50mhz, or only one oscillator operated synchronously? From the manual it says: FPU-Clock In position 2-3 the co-processor is operated synchronously, with the central processor clock. If you want to use a co-processor with another clock rate this jumper must be set to position 1-2. For asynchronous operation a second oscillator must be installed. I currently have an EC40mhz 030 with an 68882 50mhz fpu and I will upgrade the cpu to an fully MMU 50mhz. The board as you can see from the attachment, has only one oscillator running at 40mhz (so the fpu is downclocked too), that will be replaced with an 50mhz when upgraded. Do I need only the one oscillator saying 40mhz replaced, or should there be two 50mhz inserted for async mode? |
04 September 2010, 10:10 | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oooh what a feeling yeaaah dancing on the ceiling
Posts: 314
|
blah blah yadda yadda blah blah yadda yadda
Etc. Last edited by meega; 04 September 2010 at 19:00. Reason: complying with OP's level of understanding |
04 September 2010, 17:51 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
That doesn't answer anything nor makes sense, here:
Processor: EC030@40Mhz or 030@50Mhz FPU: Optional 68882 (PGA and PLCC) MMU: None in EC030s, Internal in full 030s. It is clearly upgradable to 50mhz. I like your humor Last edited by HeZoR; 04 September 2010 at 20:04. |
04 September 2010, 21:28 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 57
|
I have tried this before on a different card (think it was csa-mmr). From what I remember running sync made the FPU approx. 5% faster than async. However, 40mhz->50mhz is better than 5%(25% to be exact), so it would be beneficial to run async. I think you should be able to overclock the 030 to 50mhz and run everything nice and fast!!!
|
04 September 2010, 22:25 | #5 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,354
|
Running the FPU asynchronously (faster) will generate more heat and ultimately shorten the lifespan of your Amiga. That's about it.
Overclocking anything other than the main CPU is not worth it. I bet you hardly use anything which even accesses the FPU. |
05 September 2010, 11:07 | #6 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
@Alexh
looking at the picture the FPU (an XC68882@50) is already rated for that speed, I think its the 030 he has thats a 40mhz component. To be honest, the removal of the 40mhz Osc and replacing it with a 50mhz half can (8pin DIL) unit would do the trick - I would also recommend atleast some passive cooling from a heat sink or if in a tower - lump on some active cooling like a heat-sink and fan combo. Surprisingly a 40 - 50 mhz CPU upgrade is in fact nearly a 20% performance increase. (from about 7.6MIPS to 9.1 MIPS) |
05 September 2010, 11:21 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
I'm going to upgrade to an 50mhz CPU with MMU support. So no overclocking here.
My question was, do I need to run them with different oscillators, both rated 50mhz (async) or one 50mhz (sync)? My card now has only one oscillator rated 40mhz that would be replaced when I'll upgrade the cpu. Do I need to fit another oscillator for the fpu (async)? |
05 September 2010, 11:44 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amigaville
Age: 46
Posts: 3,336
|
Is that corrosion I see on some of the solder joints?
|
05 September 2010, 12:52 | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oooh what a feeling yeaaah dancing on the ceiling
Posts: 314
|
|
05 September 2010, 19:50 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
|
25 December 2012, 13:30 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
I've replaced the 030/40mhz no mmu with an 030/50mhz that should have internal mmu, but using the WhichAmiga command say's there's nommu. Why is it that is it now shown, my card is supporting mmu, according to this http://www.amiga-hardware.com/showha...cgi?HARDID=149 MMU: None in EC030s, Internal in full 030s.
Do I need a blizzard mkIV for MMU? Here's a photo of my card: https://secure.flickr.com/photos/hez...n/photostream/ |
25 December 2012, 15:11 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
try mmu libs to turn it on,its defualt is probably off.
then run a cpu test program. i can also see you have the jumper installed (maprom disabled i think)try it without it. |
25 December 2012, 21:37 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
Ok I will install the mmu libs and run sysinfo and whichamiga, or other software to test it?
Which jumper is the maprom? I've got one jumper removed, but I must find the manual for the right jumper settings again. Also the scsi kit is connected. |
25 December 2012, 21:40 | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
just make sure you read the docs for the mmu libs on aminet as theres a line to add to your startup
|
26 December 2012, 01:38 | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
Showconfig says CPU 68030/68882fpu/68030mmu Sysinfo says mmu found but not used WhichAmiga says no mmu. suggestions? |
|
26 December 2012, 09:22 | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
i cant remember exactly what i did,but its a case of entering a line to your startup to eneble the mmu.best to read the docs.
with whichamiga, i dont know i dont use it. if you use the mufastrom function i should turn on the mmu as it uses it to patch the roms to fastram. Last edited by roy bates; 26 December 2012 at 09:35. |
26 December 2012, 22:43 | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
Reading the docs , it says I need to patch the setpatch command to use 68030 mmu, but only if I have the exact setpatch version needed to patch!
Can you provide the right setpatch for 3.9 030? |
26 December 2012, 22:52 | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 55
Posts: 2,827
|
i'll have to read the docs.
that cant be right can it?,it shouldnt just work on 3.9 only. |
27 December 2012, 18:00 | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edessa / Greece
Posts: 33
|
dunno what's the right setpatch to work for the mmu, it's the only thing that needs modification thru the docs it says you need to update a version of setpatch to enable mmu, but OS3.9 shouldn't need such a patch on setpatch right?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DKB Cobra/Viper 030 (Full 030) + FPU + Ram £100 | ElectroBlaster | MarketPlace | 1 | 08 March 2013 12:52 |
Best CPU and FPU settings | Bloodwych | support.WinUAE | 8 | 29 January 2012 12:54 |
Async vs sync disk transfer | Lockon | support.Hardware | 4 | 25 October 2009 23:56 |
If you've got an 030 and an FPU.... | NovaCoder | support.Demos | 12 | 13 May 2009 14:51 |
WTB: FPU for my 030 accelerator | Amiga1992 | MarketPlace | 0 | 01 May 2008 12:38 |
|
|