English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 27 May 2013, 23:47   #21
Cymru
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dorathea/AT
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by pudwink View Post
I dont mind spending the money as long as i notice a difference.
NEVER, NEVER say that!! There are seven layers down Dante's Inferno to H.ell (actually a parody on Italian politics at the time) in the abyss of Amiga ownership. Your wife (or significant other) will leave you, you will be poor, dependent on a Socialistic society (welfare in the states) and destitute except for these forums.

Oh, the 030 has a small on chip cache the 020 lacks that with the MHz speed boost makes a big boost; otherwise they are identical.

Last edited by prowler; 28 May 2013 at 01:23. Reason: Back-to-back posts merged.
Cymru is offline  
Old 02 June 2013, 20:50   #22
desiv
Registered User
 
desiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzsteve View Post
But if you just want to play WHDLoad Games with a basic Workbench the 020 card is perfectly adequate.
This!

For most games, once you have enough RAM for WHDLoad to load them, they play the same speed as they would on an unexpanded system.
There are some games that can use the extra CPU, but not a huge number.

That being said, I really like my 030 at 28Mhz.
Compared to what I paid for my FastRAM card, the 030 wasn't too much more and has lots more memory and a nice speed boost for those things that use it (Internet, FPS, etc..)

I think you'll be happy either way..

desiv
desiv is offline  
Old 02 June 2013, 23:26   #23
demolition
Unregistered User
 
demolition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 43
Posts: 4,190
I first considered buying the ACA1220 but decided to pay almost double price for the ACA1232 instead. This was due to the fact that I wanted to use the 1200 for more than just games, and actually I hardly ever use it for gaming anyway.

For pure WHDLoad usage, I'd go for the ACA1220 board since you won't notice any difference in the games if you just play all the classic Amiga games made for the 500. Only booting WB and loading the games will be a little faster, but does 5 secs extra loading time make a difference for you?
demolition is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please help. Accelerator card breaks startup-sequence scsi.device (CF Card)? ibsimpson Hardware mods 1 09 May 2012 16:12
WTB-A1200 - Accelerator or ram card for WHDLoad machine tekkendp MarketPlace 0 15 June 2010 06:41
Accelerator Card Memory pan1k New to Emulation or Amiga scene 1 20 June 2006 16:36
How do I i.d. my accelerator card? Spadger support.Hardware 4 31 March 2006 12:36
Help with Blizzard IV accelerator card technium support.Hardware 14 02 September 2004 20:38

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:56.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.11847 seconds with 15 queries