11 February 2010, 22:53 | #41 | |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Quote:
Thanks, but, personally, I'd rather keep that information than go for a 96x96 avatar. However, if the majority of other members prefer to go with the larger avatars, then I won't have any objection to that. |
|
11 February 2010, 23:39 | #42 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
Thanks for considering an alternative RCK.
I'd rather have larger avatars, as those details are all under the profile link so it would be a clean solution... ...but I guess join date is kind of useful for mods and location (when people fill it in correctly - bad boy Bloodwych ) is also useful as you can tell from what part of the world someone is from without delving into their profile. It would have been nice to have the larger avatars for my now huge monitor and resolution, but if it's not unanimous then I'm happy just to leave it if extra scrolling is an issue for some. Not many forums have 64x64 limits these days, so expect this request to come up again and again though! End point is, it's your forum RCK and you get the final say on how it looks. I'd just post a sticky telling people to STOP requesting it, as it seems you are getting tired of the same request. |
12 February 2010, 00:12 | #43 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Might as well be WORK :(
Age: 56
Posts: 4,110
|
I must admit, from a mods/admins point of view, that information can sometimes be important as a quick reference to help against the war on spammers etc...
I'm now, sort of, in a bit of a dilemma regarding larger avatars. God damn it!!! |
12 February 2010, 01:06 | #44 |
Registered User
|
Removed drunk ramblings. oops! Basically I said how about a Poll ?
Last edited by BuZz; 12 February 2010 at 15:08. |
12 February 2010, 05:41 | #45 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 9,355
|
I'm not bothered. Doesn't take more than a few seconds to get onto the mod panel anyway and then just search the user.. What 25-30 secs max
I'll go with the flow lol |
12 February 2010, 15:00 | #46 |
The 1 who ribbits
|
what about my suggestion RCK ? use that unused space to the right ??
64x128 I like all that other info as well, be a shame to lose it |
12 February 2010, 15:54 | #47 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,518
|
|
12 February 2010, 19:43 | #48 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Age: 37
Posts: 11,167
|
Just my $0.02 but I would much rather we didn't lose info like join date etc. I know you can see them in the profiles but it's just a lot easier having them at a glance. It can be very useful when it comes to determing spammers, duplicate accounts and so on. Again though I'll accept whatever RCK decides on (if anything).
|
20 February 2010, 14:15 | #49 |
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Paris / France
Age: 45
Posts: 3,084
|
|
20 February 2010, 19:05 | #50 |
The 1 who ribbits
|
did`t realize there were standards for avatars
I just feel the space is wasted to the right and could be used better, but I`m happy with what ever you decide |
21 February 2010, 16:01 | #51 |
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Paris / France
Age: 45
Posts: 3,084
|
I mean, any application that ask you for one avatar want one squared picture
|
21 February 2010, 16:18 | #52 |
PSPUAE DEV
|
|
21 February 2010, 16:39 | #53 |
70X7
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ἑλλάς
Posts: 1,078
|
i hate avatars size bigger than 100x100
one good solution is 80x80 |
02 April 2010, 17:11 | #54 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amigaville
Age: 46
Posts: 3,334
|
avatar size increase?
For as long as I can remember we've been on 64x64. Is there any chance it could be upped please?
135x135? p.s. please with a cherry on top? |
02 April 2010, 17:29 | #55 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oooh what a feeling yeaaah dancing on the ceiling
Posts: 314
|
Not this again.
|
02 April 2010, 17:32 | #56 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Might as well be WORK :(
Age: 56
Posts: 4,110
|
|
02 April 2010, 17:46 | #57 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 9,355
|
merged
|
02 April 2010, 18:42 | #58 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amigaville
Age: 46
Posts: 3,334
|
oops, sorry totally forgot!
|
02 April 2010, 19:42 | #59 |
Remember: Shoot or die!
|
So, 64 x 128 avatars wouldn't only cause any scrolling issues, they would make this place even more special and unique!
When will they be possible? :P |
02 April 2010, 19:57 | #60 |
70X7
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ἑλλάς
Posts: 1,078
|
lets do it 80X80 with scanlines ..!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turrican II time limits | BuckoA51 | support.Games | 11 | 14 October 2011 00:28 |
New to EAB. long time Amiga user. | Battlstarcanada | Member Introductions | 12 | 06 April 2011 14:25 |
SCSI Dive Size Limits on A1000 | falconsfan | support.Hardware | 5 | 20 April 2007 09:07 |
no speed increase? | Unregistered | support.WinUAE | 3 | 22 September 2002 20:33 |
EAB Avatar Problem | P-J | project.EAB | 2 | 15 March 2002 16:03 |
|
|