TOSEC - Naming Convention Discussion

[Marcuz]

Originally Posted by marco pedrana

there was a tool written by somebody (sorry i remember the avatar, not the name: that' Dartagnan dog french cartoon, if my memory serves) here at EAB that was meant to check CRC and diffs, but the only sure way to check a game is playing it :/

bippym, i know you know what i'm talking about, even when i don't, which is, well, never, but anyway, do you remember the tool?

[TCD]

Originally Posted by Retro-Nerd

But the [!] is hard to get. Who should play all the (mostly) cracked game to the end?

Nobody alone of course There is a thread with approved games here and if someone completes a game he should post it there. This way we could at least give some games the [!] mark (given the disks have the complete game with intro etc.).

Edit : Found the thread http://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=23024

[Marcuz]

these thread by adderly should be sticked...

[TCD]

Originally Posted by marco pedrana

these thread by adderly should be sticked...

Second that

[Washac]

Just read through this and still none the wiser as to which ADF to use, I think it is all the replicated ones that cause the confusion.

[mai]

Primarily, TOSEC aims to identify/catalog all existing dumps for the existing systems.

[Washac]

Originally Posted by mai

Primarily, TOSEC aims to identify/catalog all existing dumps for the existing systems.

Yes, I understand what you are doing and I find it a great source of Amiga software history

I think as another poster put all the good ADFs need the [!] added to them.

[mai]

Originally Posted by Washac

Yes, I understand what you are doing and I find it a great source of Amiga software history

I think as another poster put all the good ADFs need the [!] added to them.

Its hard to find out, if a cracked game is really 100%!