29 September 2010, 16:59 | #21 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,269
|
Though why would DOSBox be slow because of SDL? I'm pretty sure its main use just to get a frame buffer, rendered entirely by DOSBox itself, onto the screen.
|
29 September 2010, 22:19 | #22 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,602
|
There's no reason why a 68000 series compatible CPU couldn't be made to run at GHz, except there's no market for one.
As Toni mentioned, the chipset trundles along at the same old comparatively measly speed. Even with fast enough RAM on the CPU board, the chipset's design really needs to be updated so that it still doesn't hog near 100% DMA time when the elaborately computed Unlimited Detail 3D Workbench/Game graphics is to be made available for Denise. Adding a simple VDU to the VDU card fixes that, and then suddenly you have not an enhanced Amiga but two computers inside an Amiga case... I fully support remaking Amiga hardware in new components, and that includes the CPU. Nothing wrong with seeing new Motorola-CPUs making possible new accel cards. Remaking the chipset is still the hard part and the holy grail to ensure a hardware future. One way to enhance Amigas way beyond CPU upgrades would be to dev some hardware hack to 1) let CPU and chipset access chipram simultaneously (innovate some dual-bus RAM, or RAM shadow copy) or failing that, 2) some DMA thingy to "copy fast" like on [that] C64 [thingy] (but from fast to chip). Last edited by Photon; 30 September 2010 at 21:27. |
29 September 2010, 23:45 | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 497
|
Amiga Quake demo
Quote:
(Seems to work with the 1.06 DOS demo pak0.pak file included) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NOZJAF4Y (7.07 MB) Just unpack the RAR, copy libs/wizard.library to LIBS: (if needed), and run from Workbench with the Quake_GUI icon. This archive also includes the MS-DOS version (quake.exe). Edit: This has also been uploaded to the HOL FTP (QuakeSW+Amiga68k.rar). Last edited by Mequa; 30 September 2010 at 02:43. |
|
30 September 2010, 01:53 | #24 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne/Australia
Posts: 4,400
|
Quote:
The problems with updating the original chipset (ie. FPGA...which is already happening with Natami and the FPGA arcade/MiniMig 2 and CloneA) are that if you go for a standard 100% compatible chipset then there isn't much point but the more you improve the original the harder it is to maintain compatibility. The other thing is that hardware is only half the problem, without new/updated software (including the OS) developed to take advantage of the new features (eg chunky display modes) it also becomes rather pointless I’m afraid I think the last real opportunity to upgrade the original AGA chipset was with the release of OS 3.9 back in the year 2000 (eg OS 3.9 would have used the updated chipset). Last edited by NovaCoder; 30 September 2010 at 01:58. |
|
30 September 2010, 02:13 | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 497
|
That is one advantage of UAE on even a low-end PC over devices like the Minimig.
Not only can all models of Amiga be emulated, but it also has various compatibility options such as cycle exact modes, as well as high-performance options such as immediate blitter, JIT and RTG. To include such a range of compatibility, performance and features on a Minimig-style device would be very difficult. Perhaps UAE on the newer mobile CPUs would be a cheaper alternative too. (Or grab an Amiga 500 off eBay.) Last edited by Mequa; 30 September 2010 at 02:23. |
30 September 2010, 02:42 | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 497
|
Toni, I just uploaded the Amiga Quake demo version to the HOL FTP (QuakeSW+Amiga68k.rar).
I hope this was the right thing to do. |
30 September 2010, 11:07 | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: poland
Posts: 307
|
I see no point in making speedy CPUs for Amiga. C'mon even if they made it possible, what would you do with it, play Lotus "on crack"? Is it worth the money just to run Quake with impressive frame rate ? I seriously doubt it would substitute your currently used PC/Mac. Modern day computing power seems to be useless when you don't have proper software. That's why my old BeOS machine remains idle these days, as I cant watch YouTube videos on that (not counting some VLC methods which did the trick in 2007). To me Amiga is a great retrogaming machine with priceless sentimental value, therefore any attempt to make it "up to date" in terms of contemporary cpu power looks a bit over the top.
|
30 September 2010, 13:39 | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Telford / England
Posts: 38
|
The appeal of the Amiga (to me) is reliving my youth a little bit. I never had anything faster than an '030 nor more than 16MB fast RAM. I've now got the same '030 but with 64MB (because it was cheap).
I could upgrade my Amiga to have a PowerPC CPU, masses of storage, a tower case, PCI board, Voodoo or Radeon etc. Utterly pointless though. I've got an enormously expensive and overpowered laptop if I want to do anything performance related (which, at the moment, means playing Minecraft). If I want a nice, retro experience, a 50MHz '030, 4GB CF and a 2GB CF in a PCMCIA adapter provide more than I really need. A new, really fast CPU for an Amiga would be an expensive novelty. |
30 September 2010, 17:29 | #29 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,531
|
|
30 September 2010, 20:48 | #30 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
Instead of a blistering Ghz 68k moto I would prefer an x86 companion card in the GHz range, somthing like a P3 or Athlon core perhaps.. thinking about about I would love it to have a Trasmetta CPU - latent crusoe core =)
be nice to have that married to a simple NForce bridge with inbuit ATA/USB/FireWire/GFX perhaps a local PCI/AGP/PIC-E bus adapter for expanions and lump in upto a GB of SDRAM and thats it I want one NOW! =) pucka! |
30 September 2010, 20:53 | #31 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,531
|
There's me thinking about a WinUAE / AROS comparision on the same machine... Just an idea Hey, put those forks and torches away, will ya!
|
01 October 2010, 01:21 | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas/Nevada
Posts: 103
|
No torches here I'd be curious to see the comparisons. Also the same machine running a cutdown linux / uae solution (something like XAmiga).. atm I think Winuae is at a point where it's (for me) becoming a better (and more cost effective) solution since my A2000 is slowly succumbing to entropy and family life has left me with considerably less cash. My 'fast amiga' is my right hand monitor - a mouse slide over and I'm back in retro land.
|
01 October 2010, 02:24 | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: France
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
the origin o this was the cheat by Apple and IBM to kill the Commodore and to Kill the ATARI they created the obsolete power PC and the secret PACT was that they forced Motorola to leave the 68k upgrades while Apple in 1994 moved to powerPC processors without any justified reason.... investing money in a total hardware redesign and loosing compatibility with old software but with the reward of kill the others companies leaving the Commodore and Atari without cpu upgrades....and forcing them to a total hardware redesign The old theory between the RISC cpu VS CISC was pure crap and an successfully intent to destroy the competence |
|
01 October 2010, 02:32 | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas/Nevada
Posts: 103
|
[citation needed]
|
01 October 2010, 08:28 | #35 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,531
|
|
01 October 2010, 09:18 | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: poland
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
I still remember that RISC propaganda when I got my PowerMac 6100 ("been there done that" campaign) and they always compared the new chip with early Pentium PCs. The didn't even bother to test it against Amiga or Atari. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Motorola 060 cpu question | jimmer78 | support.Hardware | 5 | 08 February 2013 21:49 |
A600 Motorola 68010 cpu. | lolafg | Hardware mods | 32 | 16 October 2009 04:53 |
[Found: Vyrus + Motorola Invaders 2] Vertical scroller set inside an amiga | gmiaow | Looking for a game name ? | 4 | 22 October 2008 17:20 |
Motorola 68010 CPU | whiteb | MarketPlace | 0 | 26 September 2002 05:37 |
Motorola 060 CPU's For Sale | jmmijo | MarketPlace | 0 | 29 April 2002 04:18 |
|
|