09 May 2009, 15:32 | #1 |
Precious & fragile things
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,946
|
What Is SFS?
Greetings,
I've seen many people mention SFS, I know of PFS and I use FFS on my B2000. Is there a thread that explains the difference and I know that people insist on using SFS for bigger partitions and alike, but I don't know why? Thanks, Paul |
09 May 2009, 16:17 | #2 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,337
|
All three are file systems. The method and arrangement of data on the hard drive and in memory. The software for accessing data stored within the file system is kept on the hard drive and run at boot. Before you can use a particular file system this software must be installed on the hard drive (into the RDB?)
As well as the file system the hard disk driver plays an important part in compatibility with larger disks. The hard disk driver is usually store in ROM, either in the Kickstart ROM for Amiga's with integrated hard drive controllers or a separate ROM on the hard disk interface card. You need both the file system and the hard disk driver to be capable of accessing larger hard drives and using larger partitions. For a B2000 which has no integrated hard disk controller, the first thing to do is find out which hard disk controller you have. Then determine which version of its hard disk driver is in it's ROM. If it is early then you may have to replace the ROM in order to access big hard drives. SFS needs an 020+ CPU and so unless you have an accelerator in your B2000 you cannot use it. FFS has been upgraded over the years and the latest version (45.13 + patch) will support larger partitions with an appropriate hard disk controller + driver. Dunno if this is 68000 compatible. PFS3 is the last version of PFS and it has a 68000 version and so can be used with a B2000 and appropriate hard disk controller + driver. One final word of caution. In order to create partitions of a particular file system (yes you can have different file systems for different partitions on the same physical hard drive) you must use a partitioning tool. Such as HDToolbox. Unfortunately some versions of HDToolbox also suffer from incompatibilities with bigger hard drives. You must use later versions or a 3rd party alternative to successfully create partitions. Last edited by alexh; 09 May 2009 at 16:39. |
09 May 2009, 16:42 | #3 | |
Precious & fragile things
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,946
|
Quote:
I would think that SFS stood for Slow File System, as opposed to Fast File System and Professional File System and whilst I appreciate your answer, could the benefits and detriments of each system be outlayed here? Paul |
|
09 May 2009, 17:06 | #4 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
SFS is the greatest of the 3 file system. But as Alexh said, it is only 020+ machines...
|
09 May 2009, 17:18 | #5 | |||
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,337
|
Quote:
You'll still need to find out what version of hard disk driver you have on the SCSI controller to see if you can use big hard drives. v4.15 was the last. Unfortunately I do not know the history of GVP hard disk drivers and so I cannot tell you the minimum version you need. Open a CLI window and type "version gvpscsi.device" ?? A method of getting the SFS software from the internet onto your Amiga. A spare hard drive to try it with or a backup of your hard drive & set of working workbench disks in case something goes wrong. Quote:
Quote:
Benefits :
Last edited by alexh; 09 May 2009 at 17:28. |
|||
26 June 2009, 10:55 | #6 |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
Can anyone point me to a guide to setting up SFS? i.e. what software I need, where to install things to etc.. I tried to set up ShapeShifter last night and hard disk access was painfully slow I gather this is due to using an old version of FFS?
|
26 June 2009, 11:26 | #7 | |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
Ill have to test out sometime unless anyone knows if FAT32 can be used for large HD and maybe works on 68000.
Quote:
http://wiki.abime.net/amiga:killergo...winuae_realhdd As for Shapeshifter slow harddisk access if you copy your Mac boot/OS hard file over to Ram and point Shapeshifter towards this, it will run a lot faster. |
|
26 June 2009, 11:50 | #8 |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
Thanks
|
26 June 2009, 11:52 | #9 |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
|
26 June 2009, 12:01 | #10 |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
My setup is also 32mb - The ShapeShifter HDF in the zone has "Small-Boot" this is the Mac/OS hardfile and is about 3mb - when copying this file over to Ram on my Amiga takes less than a mintute.
If you intend to run a large HD i still recomend having a smaller Boot that can be copied to Ram. |
26 June 2009, 12:04 | #11 | |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
Quote:
|
|
26 June 2009, 12:18 | #12 |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
|
26 June 2009, 13:03 | #13 |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
SFS has made a HUGE MASSIVE ALMIGHTY difference - where it took 30 mins to boot last night it now takes under 1 min
Also important (I think) is the buffers - see http://www.simon.mooli.org.uk/AF/12.html Trouble is - I changed screen resolution, and now the screen is corrupt |
26 June 2009, 13:06 | #14 | |
Phone Homer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 5150
Posts: 5,773
|
Quote:
|
|
26 June 2009, 13:08 | #15 |
Its hard being famous!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gateway to the dales, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 633
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which is better SFS or PFS | source | support.Apps | 23 | 19 August 2010 18:00 |
Sfs.... | xc8 | support.Apps | 12 | 19 April 2010 00:49 |
SFS on WB 2.1 - possible? | mancalledSun | support.WinUAE | 3 | 13 February 2010 21:42 |
SFS Help | Macca | support.Hardware | 13 | 11 June 2007 21:36 |
HD with SFS problem ? | Shoonay | support.Hardware | 1 | 01 January 2006 19:08 |
|
|