19 January 2017, 08:51 | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 3,772
|
What's wrong with calling something "buggery" or "short pcb trix"? Do you think all schematics are 100% professional? You've obviously got absolutely no idea about the electronics industry, and you are doing nothing but making an absolute dick of yourself.
Get a clue, and a sense of humour, and I'm sure you'll have a much more enjoyable time on this forum. Tosser. |
19 January 2017, 09:19 | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
|
|
19 January 2017, 10:15 | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: GR
Age: 46
Posts: 1,416
|
I dont get it. What is the problem, they wrote some sh1t on the schematic so what. I wrote sh1t also when I was 25 and playing World of Warcraft so who cares. What is this some post 20 years public court
|
19 January 2017, 13:36 | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,334
|
So you've decided to finally have a look at the schematics and learn about them, rather than making vague guesses at how Amigas work? Excellent. Bizarre that you're finding all this "evidence" of some weird cover up, it's a strange mindset that finds things like this when there is a much simpler, more obvious answer available.
As was pointed out to you repeatedly in the other thread, there's no way they were intending any other purpose for the RAM expansion headers, other than RAM expansion and a real-time clock. The headers are basically the A1200's equivalent of the A500 and A600 trapdoor slots in a different form factor. The clockport pins are the only ones accessible for GPIO, all the others are simply lines from the chip RAM bus. The guys designing these boards knew what they were doing - if they'd wanted an I/O port for high-speed audio sampling or whatever, they'd have come up with something more suitable... Like Zorro. The A1200's trapdoor slot is the mythical expansion port you seem to be trying and failing to find - it's basically a restricted Zorro slot, so can be used for general expansion. See the unreleased A1200 CD32-compatible drive, Mediator cards, and all the sophisticated accelerators available for examples. The RAM expansion pins were for RAM expansion. Nothing more, nothing less. As for "buggery", many words have more than one meaning, and it's common enough to refer to something that doesn't work as "buggered". In this case, a bug in a chip buggered up their schematic, requiring extra logic to work around it. Seems more like a little clever wordplay by an engineer, rather than some cryptic message left behind by the Illuminati for you to find. |
19 January 2017, 14:04 | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
This Schematic then - who had one prior to CBM going bust? You say there was no cover up, well to prove that Mr Daed, you've got to show this particular document ever left Commodore before they filed for chapter 11. That one, I admit, I'm not sure about. I have never said there is definite evidence that the clockport can be made better than it was. Nor have I said there is definite evidence of a conspiracy by an outside agency, the "Illuminati" as you put it. Yet all those concepts come from yourself. Can't seem to find a reference to them in this thread. You will have to admit, it's a bit of a coincidence. And the presence of these electrically dubious names for things would explain WHY the document was withheld from me at least. Quite possibly everybody else outside CBM until they went to their corporate grave. I don't even know if the thing is 100% genuine, but YOU seem pretty sure it is. Why is that? Last edited by Pat the Cat; 19 January 2017 at 14:11. |
|
19 January 2017, 14:11 | #26 | |
Unregistered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 43
Posts: 4,190
|
Quote:
And btw, humans really landed on the moon in '69 and no government or agency was behind 9/11. That should get you going.. |
|
19 January 2017, 14:26 | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
I agree. Broadly true. I did see some powerful stuff pointing at Rumsfeld as an individual, but even that does not conflict with your statement, even if he was largely responsible for orchestrating the events after 9/11, which he earned very large sums of money for. Honestly or dishonestly is irrelevant in this thread anyway |
|
19 January 2017, 14:57 | #28 | ||||||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,334
|
Quote:
Anyway, if an engineer is given creative freedom, they will do things like that. They always have. They always will. I've done it, every engineer I know has done it. It's just a way of putting a personal touch and a bit of humour into what is otherwise quite a monotonous task. So what if they used offensive or politically incorrect? Those schematics were never intended for human consumption. I'm sure they'd be quite amused to think that someone is reading so much into what was probably a 30 second throwaway joke a quarter of a century ago. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
19 January 2017, 14:57 | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mason, Ohio / USA
Age: 48
Posts: 391
|
What is that phrase? Tempest or storm in a teapot?
I personally find it amusing that all you UK and Euro folks are debating about American slang in an American companies schematics. |
19 January 2017, 15:01 | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,334
|
Don't worry, we do the very same thing with our schematics this side of the pond. It's only one person who is suddenly seeing something else in them that we've all missed the past 20 years.
|
19 January 2017, 15:19 | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
Ever heard of Formscan? They produced the digital reproduction, encoding, and tranmission techniques for digital document transmission. They weren't the only people who did those things, but they were supplying the equipment a long time before you could walk into a shop and buy a fax machine over the counter. Faxes have to scan a document to reproduce it. Commodore could have sent this doument by fax, received by fax, never printed it, true. Over the phone lines at the time, that would have been bonkers. If the electrical connections are correct, then THAT is the most important thing. |
|
19 January 2017, 15:21 | #32 | |
Unregistered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 43
Posts: 4,190
|
Quote:
|
|
19 January 2017, 15:36 | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
Ever heard of Formscan? They produced the digital reproduction, encoding, and tranmission techniques for digital document transmission. They weren't the only people who did those things, but they were supplying the equipment a long time before you could walk into a shop and buy a fax machine over the counter. Faxes have to scan a document to reproduce it. Commodore could have sent this doument by fax, received by fax, never printed it, true. Over the phone lines at the time, that would have been bonkers. Let's see, with a little boost for encoding, call it 240 characters per seocnd. 4 seconds per K of data. Perhaps half an hour to send the Rev 2 file, assuming roughly as efficient storage as original. However, to fax it, about 6-7 minutes per page. Around 1 hour, 45 minutes or so. To send one person one copy tha could only be as good as theprinter that made them. If the electrical connections are correct, then THAT is the most important thing. |
|
19 January 2017, 16:47 | #34 |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 47
Posts: 3,751
|
I googled buggery. Sounded so innocent. Cant blame Pat for his interpretation of the document, really.
Note: Guys, take a chill pill, please |
19 January 2017, 17:11 | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
@1m23s
[ Show youtube player ] |
19 January 2017, 17:29 | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,334
|
Quote:
But don't let that get in the way of your mission to fill the forum with pointless waffle, vague guesses and plain noise in your quest to appear as some sort of "expert". |
|
19 January 2017, 18:35 | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
|
|
19 January 2017, 18:40 | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Worksop/UK
Age: 59
Posts: 1,328
|
More Prozac required!
|
19 January 2017, 18:41 | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London / Sydney
Age: 47
Posts: 20,420
|
Ok, this thread is really going nowhere and there's a lot of disagreement / agro from various people...
Sorry, but no choice left except to close before it gets any worse |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Voices8" 8 Channel Soundtracker "DemoSongI" song - "This is the Amiga with 8 Voices" | DemosongIHunter | request.Music | 45 | 23 May 2022 20:07 |
"Reminder "Lincs Amiga User Group aka "LAG" Meet Sat 5th of January 2013" | rockape | News | 4 | 30 January 2013 00:06 |
DOS-Error #205 on reading "Disk.1". | e5frog | project.WHDLoad | 6 | 22 July 2010 18:03 |
"DOS-Error #205 (object not found) on reading "devs:kickstarts/kick 40068.a4000" | Brutal_dentist | New to Emulation or Amiga scene | 10 | 03 April 2005 23:12 |
"DOS-Error #205 (object not found) on reading "devs:kickstarts/kick 40068.a4000" | Unregistered | New to Emulation or Amiga scene | 1 | 22 December 2004 09:48 |
|
|