15 March 2005, 01:41 | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 148
|
I have this as my secondary monitor:
http://www.overclock.co.uk/customer/...roductid=17534 There is noticable flickering whenever I scroll anything. I wouldn't use it for games. |
15 March 2005, 09:32 | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: home
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
The response time is quite large (20ms) compared to other 12-16ms. Are you satisfied with it in 2D & 3D games? |
|
15 March 2005, 10:16 | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 580
|
Its very good tft, I am not using it for games, but image is very very good. response time is real 20 ms. for hardcore gamers I recommeds number lower than 16ms (16, 12 or 8). but there is a questions - real response time is measured when when pixels is going from white -> black -> white. (there are used 3 parts of light R,G,B) some companies presents the lower response time only for one part (where is time lowest) red -> black -> red etc. and other parts can be much slower or not synchronous.
So, decision is: If you are hardcore gamer - buy something with <16ms response (usually smaller displays has lower response time, for example you should try samsung 17" or 15") (btw I am hardcore gamer, and I am playing on IBM T40 laptop (20ms) (also winuae), and I didnt notice any noise (or I am habitated with it) so I didnt see any problem here) If you are playing game occassionaly, you can buy this one - he has a lot of good features/stuff If you want to play 3d fps games - you should buy CRT. |
15 March 2005, 18:51 | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: home
Posts: 171
|
Thanks.
|
16 March 2005, 13:26 | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: home
Posts: 171
|
I've read at other forums that, if I want to use the TFT for emulation it would probably be a good idea to stay away from 1280x1024 native REs LCDs, since they have an unusual aspect ratio (5:4 instead of 4:3).
In that case these EIZO TFTs I posted are not suitable for emulation since their native resolution is 1280x1024 thus being 5:4 instead of 4:3. Is that true? EIZO 17'' L550 http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/l550/index.asp# Specs: http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/l550/spec.asp I found this at a shop for 399 Euros / 534$ is this price ok? Or this: EIZO 17'' L551 http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/l551/index.asp# Specs: http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/l557/spec.asp What resolutions over 1280x1024 have 4:3 aspect ratio in TFT monitos? |
18 March 2005, 00:07 | #26 |
Amiga user since 1990
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kingsport, TN / USA
Age: 44
Posts: 295
|
If you want the best possible emulation, you need to use a TV-out. Period. Emulators can be good on TFT, but they're better on TV-out (plus, with TV-out, you should have no problem hitting 50Hz in PAL land, of course, barring OS shittyness). I'm in NTSC land myself, and I run emulators through my TV-out at 640x480 (or 720x480 in the case of the Genesis). I also run CCS64 at 400x300, forced to 60Hz refresh, even for PAL demos/games (to rid the screen of the horrible jerkyness from trying to display 50fps on 60Hz). Best TV-out resolution for PAL Amiga emulation should be 720x576 (or 768x576, depending on your card).
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100/120Hz support for LCD gaming monitors | buckrogers | support.FS-UAE | 4 | 20 November 2012 12:50 |
Selling 20" Samsung Syncmaster TFT LCD Monitor | PowerPie5000 | MarketPlace | 1 | 04 March 2010 16:55 |
Using an LCD/TFT display with an OCS/ECS/AGA Amiga | Photon | support.Hardware | 1 | 15 August 2009 00:28 |
TFT LCD Display | JDunlap | Hardware mods | 13 | 25 January 2008 14:36 |
A1200 with LCD TFT Monitor 15" | jibos71 | support.Hardware | 6 | 21 April 2007 15:13 |
|
|