just one little question...

Error · 14 January 2004, 20:32

hello...

I have a question that has probably been asked multiple times so far [please don't punish my whole country for that, they're not guilty of me

]..

is there a tiny, minute possibility that [Win]UAE would ever support just one CPU with MMU..? I know it would terribly slow down emulation but.. at the moment the only ways for me to get rid of some of bugs I make from time to time are either tons of code that help me to track any possible mistakes I could make or.. travel home or to my betatesters as I don't have my miggy here where I study [not to mention that working on plain miggy with 040/40 is more than pain in the.. when it comes to compile stuff with GnuC++

]..

Hope You don't mind my asking at all, do You?

Cheers!

Toni Wilen · 14 January 2004, 21:30

68040 with MMU will be implemented someday (but notice that JIT can't be used with MMU == slower than slow..)

I wrote 68040 MMU emulation code about 1.5 years or so ago just for fun but then I lost interest for some reason..

btw, try winuaeenforcer in Amiga Programs-directory (I have never used it but I have heard it is useful)

Error · 15 January 2004, 10:27

Hello

There could be a small problem:

I receive TONS of WinUAEEnforcer hits caused by input.device and something else [anyways, both are system native devices], even if I boot without startup sequence... This is something I can't handle.. and for speed... I really doubt if it'd be slower than my 040/40 with 32MB simm

eventually I will buy a faster PC

besides, any chance You could help me with those enforcer hits? perhaps this would solve most of my problems

Many thanks in advance!

14 January 2004, 20:32	#1
Error Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Seattle / WA / USA Age: 41 Posts: 50	just one little question... hello... I have a question that has probably been asked multiple times so far [please don't punish my whole country for that, they're not guilty of me ].. is there a tiny, minute possibility that [Win]UAE would ever support just one CPU with MMU..? I know it would terribly slow down emulation but.. at the moment the only ways for me to get rid of some of bugs I make from time to time are either tons of code that help me to track any possible mistakes I could make or.. travel home or to my betatesters as I don't have my miggy here where I study [not to mention that working on plain miggy with 040/40 is more than pain in the.. when it comes to compile stuff with GnuC++ ].. Hope You don't mind my asking at all, do You? Cheers!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
cf question	trydowave	support.Hardware	4	18 July 2013 00:14
Sensible question	mmmfreegoo	support.Games	5	25 November 2006 17:10
question	nnever2000	project.SPS (was CAPS)	2	16 July 2003 17:15
A Question...	DoaBlade	request.Old Rare Games	2	06 January 2002 05:40

14 January 2004, 21:30	#2
Toni Wilen WinUAE developer Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland Age: 49 Posts: 26,502	68040 with MMU will be implemented someday (but notice that JIT can't be used with MMU == slower than slow..) I wrote 68040 MMU emulation code about 1.5 years or so ago just for fun but then I lost interest for some reason.. btw, try winuaeenforcer in Amiga Programs-directory (I have never used it but I have heard it is useful)

15 January 2004, 10:27	#3
Error Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Seattle / WA / USA Age: 41 Posts: 50	Hello There could be a small problem: I receive TONS of WinUAEEnforcer hits caused by input.device and something else [anyways, both are system native devices], even if I boot without startup sequence... This is something I can't handle.. and for speed... I really doubt if it'd be slower than my 040/40 with 32MB simm eventually I will buy a faster PC besides, any chance You could help me with those enforcer hits? perhaps this would solve most of my problems Many thanks in advance!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)