14 April 2018, 03:46 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
AmigaOS 3.9 - Straight Install or WB3.1 -> OS3.5 -> OS 3.9?
I'm just now getting the hang of customizing it after all these years.
fresh clean WB3.1 install, then OS3.9, then Boing Bags 1 - 4 then i started my Aminet raid. Here is as far as I've gotten so far. I'm just beginning to learn the ropes on custom icons so I will be redoing all the icons in my setup that make sense to change. |
14 April 2018, 15:28 | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
AmigaOS 3.9 - Straight Install or WB3.1 -> OS3.5 -> OS 3.9?
Quote:
Without installation 3.5 you have problems with the icons view (gray) |
|
14 April 2018, 15:42 | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
personally, I think that is so stupid. I purchased an Operating System. Not an Operating system upgrade. If my Amiga had no Operating system and a CD-Rom drive then I could have just installed OS3.9 with nothing before it and you say this is incorrect as well? If the icon problem is the only issue I can live with that. But now I'm rather annoyed. I also told the OS3.9 installer that I did not want to upgrade the 3.1 installation, that instead I wanted to do a full install over 3.1, this is incorrect? No where in the docs did it say this was incorrect or that I'd have problems. Is everything on Amiga a money grab? I purchased OS3.9 to deal with the CoffinOS issue. Maybe I'll just go back to Coffin OS and start my customizing from there. After all, I'm a legit 3.9 user now so I can sleep at night. EDIT: This is printed right on the Vesalia purchase page: "AmigaOS 3.9 is the update for Amiga OS 3.5 -- but it can also be installed directly on top of an Amiga OS 3.1 system. " So I what's the deal? Last edited by Sinphaltimus; 14 April 2018 at 15:54. |
|
14 April 2018, 15:51 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
If I remember well on CD OS 3.9 there should also be OS3.5, in any case, the best solution is to start from one Hardisk empty and use THIS tutorial of the good Thomas "Quick Installation Guide for OS3.9 on WinUAE (with CD-ROM support)".
|
14 April 2018, 15:55 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
From the Vasalia website -
AmigaOS 3.9 is the update for Amiga OS 3.5 -- but it can also be installed directly on top of an Amiga OS 3.1 system. http://www.vesalia.de/e_os39.htm |
14 April 2018, 16:02 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
|
14 April 2018, 16:53 | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
It doesn't, it very clearly says "but it can also be installed directly on top of an Amiga OS 3.1 system." Without any warning. I believe my "icon" issue is because the icon I had issue with came from a third party for SDMountOnOff - I'll just replace it with my own custom one made from scratch. |
|
14 April 2018, 17:00 | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
Quote:
OS 3.9 it can be installed safely with WB3.1, OS3.5 I only add one function to correctly see the colors of some icons, if you look on the forum you will also find out how to get around the problem. I attach an old video of mine where you can see the problem "Icons Gray " after installing (was installing RealAmiga) [ Show youtube player ] Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 14 April 2018 at 17:12. |
|
14 April 2018, 18:14 | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
My apologies, I haven't spotted a problem in your video above.
Where (time) is the grey problem? All my icons so far have no issues except for the one Icon I mentioned (SDMountOnOff) that you can see all the way to the left on my Amidock. I fixed it as best I could by trimming away excess graphics in IconEdit but the transparency is stuck at being perfectly square - only for that one icon tho' so you're saying there is a fix? Is this something I can extract from an OS3.5 setup should I be able to find one? I don't have AmiKit. Just because I don't know it or understand about it all that much. No other reason. And I think it costs money too so I'm not sure I would need it really. |
14 April 2018, 18:41 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
If you install OS 3.9 directly on OS 3.1 you will get this result, see screenshot,
Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 11 May 2018 at 01:33. |
14 April 2018, 18:54 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
This instead the installation WB3.1 -> OS3.5 -> OS 3.9, see screenshot!
Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 11 May 2018 at 01:33. |
14 April 2018, 19:13 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,176
|
|
14 April 2018, 19:17 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
I only see that on one or two icons, as you can see in my screenshot my Amidock speaker, unarc and others came out just fine.
EditPad being one. EDIT 2: That is a very bizarre issue with "some" icons. I don't think I'm going to fix it per se', at least not in the way a 3.5 to 3.9 might have. Since I'm building up this system to have a "Vampire" theme, I'm going to end up editing most of the icons anyway, so i will manually fix any I find with the issue. As an example, see my new edit pad icon I just created quickly. Thanks for your concern but you damn near gave me a heart attack AMIGASYSTEM. This is a minor issue I can live with. I literally thought my entire installation might have been hosed the way you put it. Last edited by Sinphaltimus; 14 April 2018 at 19:54. Reason: EDIT editpad |
30 April 2018, 11:23 | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,335
|
Indeed, neither did I. Funny that OS 3.9's own installer comes with an option to install over 3.1 / to an empty partition. If 3.5 was a requirement that option would not be provided.
@Thread I suspect if you have funky icons after your installation over 3.1, it's because of one of these reasons: - Your 3.1 installation was somehow problematic (e.g. file permissions), causing some libraries or files to not be updated (though I suspect this would give an error during installation); - You're doing something messing with Setpatch or applying alternative patches that are preventing the new workbench and icon libraries from working properly; - You're installing from within 3.1 rather than from within 3.9 (via emergency floppy) as clearly stated in the instructions, meaning the old versions of some files (like icon.library) can't be flushed and replaced with the new versions, resulting in the 3.1 icon.library being used for some operations. Last edited by Daedalus; 30 April 2018 at 12:17. |
30 April 2018, 12:13 | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
Quote:
The two icons RAM and SYSTEM find them on Coffin OS, icon SYSTEM when you click on it, the default OS 3.1 icon still appears Last edited by AMIGASYSTEM; 11 May 2018 at 01:32. |
|
30 April 2018, 16:48 | #16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
^^^THIS^^^^ This is totally what I did. do you think at this point I could reinstall OS3.9 from within my OS3.9 currently? I tried creating an emergency floppy disk but there wasn't enough room (ran out of space) and that threw me off. I suppose I can try again. |
|
30 April 2018, 17:10 | #17 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,335
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
30 April 2018, 17:44 | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
I will take a backup of my current installation and try to reinstall OS3.9 again. Sorry for dragging this off-topic. I'll create a new topic to continue should I need to. |
|
30 April 2018, 18:12 | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cresco, PA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
I also have a plain WB3.1 installation and my customized OS3.9 installation. After so many years away from Amiga, I really want to learn the workbench all over again. I want to learn some scripting and programming on it. Right now I'm just getting back into Octamed and Fantavision. Soon I'm going to start frame by frame animation again (Dpaint) and may start 3D stuff on it again but right now the only viable application for it is lightwave I think and I don't know lightwave enough. All because it's fun to me. And interesting. I can't explain the affinity I have for this platform but here I am so many years later playing with it again. Doing more creative stuff on it than my much more capable PC. I'm seriously considering doing a 3.9 install with nothing before it. Yes, Boing bags 1-4 - I'm all for it as well. I never tried AFA-OS - Maybe I'll add that to my list as well. |
|
30 April 2018, 19:14 | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,248
|
Quote:
After this you start WinUAE with "Emergency-Disk" + CD-ROM 3.9 (auto mount) + HardFile (Partitioned, formatted or partitioned format before installation) and proceed with installation by choosing the item "Full installation over OS 3.0 or Empty HD" |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fresh new wb3.1 on a4000! What to install now? | kaneelschep | support.Apps | 15 | 26 June 2018 09:58 |
A4000 WB3.9 68060 PPC HD Install | JZon | support.WinUAE | 29 | 10 November 2016 00:36 |
Can I install AmigaOS 3.9 with.... | jdog320 | support.Other | 2 | 31 October 2015 16:14 |
WB3.1 install on 4GB Compact Flash - video resolutions? | eebuckeye | support.Hardware | 3 | 25 April 2014 03:18 |
OS3.9 install | Syko | support.WinUAE | 49 | 12 November 2002 03:11 |
|
|