06 November 2003, 17:47 | #81 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
WTF do the PCI and AGP slots in Macs take? STANDARD CARDS. What are you talking about? we're not speaking of NuBus machines here. |
|
06 November 2003, 18:31 | #82 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
Second I was referring to retro games meaning retro equipment like nubus powerd macs , 68k macs were of pentium era vintage which I consider retro. There are alot of joysticks, gamepads, and racing wheels out there that just dont have mac drivers even if you could hook them up physically. |
|
06 November 2003, 22:08 | #83 | |||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You said you used 10.1 for a while, how can you be assuming such a load of stuff with zero experience with the current OS? |
|||
06 November 2003, 23:09 | #84 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
Well I have read alot of people hacking the bios and some hardware on PC cards to get them to work in OSX running macs. This includes video cards and hd controllers. So you never tried installing a non mac card inta a machine and say it will work but 3 paragraphs down your bitching about my zero experience? All I know is that just because a joystick is recognised by an OS as a USB device it doesnt mean that the 15 butons and sliders will work unless there are drivers for it on that OS. Doesnt matter if your using macos, unix, windows 9x, windows 2k, beos, etc its all the same there. Ever wonder how mac video cards are always 2x more expensive then the normal version for the pc? If you could just plug in any of them this wouldnt be the case. I do know for a fact that you need an apple rommed card for macos 7-9 so I dont see why they would change (unless somebody hacked a linux driver to work in osx). I did connect a few USB devices to my mac when I was playing around with osx and a few worked great and a few had problems (mice, keyboards, external drive, etc). |
|
06 November 2003, 23:55 | #85 |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Basilisk is pretty good, actually, Unk.
|
07 November 2003, 00:01 | #86 | |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Quote:
One freind has an iMac, the newer one, and his retrogaming is fine, in regards to peripherlas. It's the emyuators that suck, mostly. No doubt, Windoze, if only because of ubiquity, wins the emulators battle hands down. The best retrogaming takes place on PCs. |
|
07 November 2003, 07:26 | #87 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,375
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 07:34 | #88 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,375
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 11:46 | #89 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
Also, he had to do something with all his NeXTStep shite Even since I heard about Rhapsody (OS X's prototype predecessor) I was very excited. OS 9 is really useless today. Yes, it runs with quite a lot of speed in my iBook, but I have no apps to use it. |
|
07 November 2003, 12:35 | #90 | |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Quote:
Can't expect someone vibrant and creative like Steve Jobs to stay with an old warhorse, can you? |
|
07 November 2003, 18:40 | #91 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 19:38 | #92 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 19:42 | #93 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 22:03 | #94 | |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Quote:
|
|
07 November 2003, 22:38 | #95 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Once you switch it makes no sense to go back. Obviously lots of people with old Macs should use it, but using OS9 in any new Mac is pointless, since all the available OS X apps have seriously surpassed its OS9 antecesors.
I puke everytime I see a Powerbook G4 running OS9. what a waste of time. |
07 November 2003, 23:27 | #96 | |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Quote:
To me, it's pointless |
|
08 November 2003, 01:29 | #97 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
08 November 2003, 03:12 | #98 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
|
Quote:
Fuck, I ran Photoshop 1.2 the othe rday and it worked perfectly. |
|
08 November 2003, 04:09 | #99 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
If you already have a system that can run OSX optimally then I dont see going back to OS 9.x, but why upgrade if what you have works and upgrading the OS will break it. |
|
08 November 2003, 04:12 | #100 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Age: 62
Posts: 2,395
|
Actually I have a point to make why I can't switch from OS9.xx to X, it's because Apple screwed me and others who have a MAC Clone
My best MAC is the clone I have, the Power Center 150 that I've upgraded with a G3-400MHz and 394MB of ram. It's not a bad machine at all, however Apple will not allow me to run OS X on it or install it what so ever The G3 upgrade I bought for it from Sonnet supposedly has some kind of patch thing that will allow me to install OS X but really I'm waiting to get a nice used G4 now instead and then go that route I'm sure I'll eventually find what I'm looking for so in the meantime OS9.xx is just fine for the little I do with it. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is this announcement shown all the time? | Amiga1992 | project.EAB | 7 | 28 October 2012 03:28 |
Cf Hd not shown | Retrofan | support.Hardware | 2 | 05 October 2012 19:31 |
Some icons not shown on OS3.9 | Foul | support.Apps | 50 | 06 March 2011 11:31 |
CF HD not shown with FastATA | Retrofan | support.Other | 14 | 08 January 2011 00:17 |
OS4 update - A late xmas present from the OS4 team | Paul | News | 1 | 28 December 2004 20:48 |
|
|