English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Main > Amiga scene

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 06 December 2019, 08:43   #781
Turrican_3
Registered User

Turrican_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmigaHope View Post
every single A1000 produced has signatures inside the case, it was part of the mold and the mold was never changed.
Hmm, I've read somewhere that later models had no signatures on the upper part of the chassis, but I can't remember where.
Turrican_3 is offline  
Old 10 December 2019, 01:17   #782
AmigaHope
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Sandusky
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turrican_3 View Post
Hmm, I've read somewhere that later models had no signatures on the upper part of the chassis, but I can't remember where.
It's the opposite. The developer/demo systems sent out in 1985 had bespoke cases that didn't have the signatures. The production versions that shipped from the very end of 1985 onward were mass produced with injection molding, and they all had signatures.
AmigaHope is offline  
Old 10 December 2019, 01:59   #783
Nightshft
Registered User

Nightshft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Austria
Age: 44
Posts: 318
So a cases without signature are rare and more valuable? (SCNR )
Nightshft is offline  
Old 10 December 2019, 05:53   #784
AmigaHope
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Sandusky
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightshft View Post
So a cases without signature are rare and more valuable? (SCNR )
Yup that's pretty much the case. xD (oof on the pun, sorry)
AmigaHope is offline  
Old 12 December 2019, 16:42   #785
Turrican_3
Registered User

Turrican_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmigaHope View Post
It's the opposite. The developer/demo systems sent out in 1985 had bespoke cases that didn't have the signatures. The production versions that shipped from the very end of 1985 onward were mass produced with injection molding, and they all had signatures.
Oh, so I got it very very VERY wrong! :-\

My apologies, I always hate spreading misinformation.
Turrican_3 is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 09:12   #786
Pyromania
Moderator

Pyromania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,335
ACA500plus Still working great in the Amiga 1000?
Pyromania is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 10:57   #787
sparhawk
Registered User

sparhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Essen/Germany
Age: 51
Posts: 304
I have no problems with it and it works fine so far. It's really a great thing. Only problem is, I don't know how to enable the CF card(s). It's still usefull though, because I can boot the KS disk from it, have 8MB RAM and also tried the 14MHz mode, though I usually keep it disabled, as I'm not sure if this is really safe to use, and my A1000 never had more then the 7MHz back then anyway.
sparhawk is online now  
Old 20 February 2020, 11:31   #788
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyromania View Post
ACA500plus Still working great in the Amiga 1000?
My manual says - bolded - "Never connect the ACA500plus to an Amiga 1000! Please see wiki for more information"
dreadnought is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 12:39   #789
Turrican_3
Registered User

Turrican_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 162
With the exception of an issue I've recently mentioned here (system crash when trying to choose boot partition with KS 3+) the ACA500plus seems to be working flawlessly in my A1000.

BUT, that very warning clearly makes me a bit nervous nevertheless, hence I wouldn't mind a version actually designed for it - not to mention this one is physically unstable and this makes the system slightly prone to crash.
Turrican_3 is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 15:01   #790
sparhawk
Registered User

sparhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Essen/Germany
Age: 51
Posts: 304
As far as I understood it the warning is mostly, because users didn't graps that the A500 port is the "wrong way" around as compared to the A1000. So I guess he got frequent reports that something is not working or damaging the machine, because users simply used it the wrong way.
sparhawk is online now  
Old 20 February 2020, 16:21   #791
d4rk3lf
Registered User

d4rk3lf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparhawk View Post
As far as I understood it the warning is mostly,.
You wanna say: we shouldn't hold icy cold beer on the card?
d4rk3lf is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 17:01   #792
Toni Wilen
WinUAE developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 45
Posts: 23,676
Most likely reason is very dangerous myth from back the day: A1000 port was supposedly upside down compared to A500. It is back to front ("THIS SIDE UP!" marking on top of ACA500plus PCB stays on top even when connected to A1000), not upside down!

Connecting it upside down will kill it. (or in case of later "big dismo" version which has protection resistors that burn if it is connected upside down, preventing expensive chip damage)
Toni Wilen is offline  
Old 20 February 2020, 20:12   #793
AmigaHope
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Sandusky
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toni Wilen View Post
Most likely reason is very dangerous myth from back the day: A1000 port was supposedly upside down compared to A500. It is back to front ("THIS SIDE UP!" marking on top of ACA500plus PCB stays on top even when connected to A1000), not upside down!

Connecting it upside down will kill it. (or in case of later "big dismo" version which has protection resistors that burn if it is connected upside down, preventing expensive chip damage)
C= really should have had a keying notch to prevent this. =(
AmigaHope is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 00:41   #794
Nightshft
Registered User

Nightshft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Austria
Age: 44
Posts: 318
This guy made a nice stand (low-price) for the card and his A1000. I think it's awesome for the few bucks it costs.

The card is a normal ACA500 without "+". (Note the benchmark is higher because of using an ACA1233 card additionally.)

[ Show youtube player ]
Nightshft is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 01:52   #795
Pyromania
Moderator

Pyromania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,335
@Nightshft

Very nice!
Pyromania is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 03:17   #796
r.cade
Registered User
r.cade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 392
Send a message via AIM to r.cade Send a message via MSN to r.cade Send a message via Yahoo to r.cade
Strangely, my ACA500+ doesn't work in either of my 500's, but works fine on my 1000. As long as it's seated right, anyway- it has to be propped up at a little bit of an angle to boot.
r.cade is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 10:14   #797
sparhawk
Registered User

sparhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Essen/Germany
Age: 51
Posts: 304
I put some books and my gotek under it, so that it's propped up. It worked also without it, but I feel better this way. Don't know if the strain would damage something, if there is a constant drag on the port.
sparhawk is online now  
Old 21 February 2020, 11:38   #798
spudje
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by r.cade View Post
Strangely, my ACA500+ doesn't work in either of my 500's, but works fine on my 1000. As long as it's seated right, anyway- it has to be propped up at a little bit of an angle to boot.
I assume you know you have to connect it to the A500s in the opposite direction than to an A1000?
spudje is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 12:10   #799
appiah4
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Somewhere in Time
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by spudje View Post
I assume you know you have to connect it to the A500s in the opposite direction than to an A1000?

Opposite as in the CF cards face towards the back rather than being upside down?
appiah4 is offline  
Old 21 February 2020, 13:23   #800
d4rk3lf
Registered User

d4rk3lf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by appiah4 View Post
Opposite as in the CF cards face towards the back rather than being upside down?


This
d4rk3lf is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aca500 cfaux elpiloto support.Hardware 0 30 December 2014 23:35
ACA500 in A2000 - possible or not? amigoun support.Hardware 3 21 November 2014 20:09
ACA500 slowdown DonutKing support.Hardware 0 15 April 2014 13:50
ACA500 install gurth support.Hardware 19 23 March 2014 23:16
ACA500 - Who Will Sell This? Smakar support.Hardware 6 01 March 2013 10:37

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.11331 seconds with 16 queries