English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware > Hardware mods

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 26 June 2008, 04:20   #21
Amiga1992
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
I suppose this would not work if you have an accelerator card, right?
Amiga1992 is offline  
Old 26 June 2008, 04:33   #22
Zetr0
Ya' like it Retr0?
 
Zetr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
@Akira

using a ram upgrade i am sure it would still work...

but an accelerator.... maybe not... or if it did, it could slow the system down...

for instance the FPU is governed by the on-board motherboard clock.... if you were running an 030@50mhz.... anytime it encountered FPU arithmetic it would be shunted to the FPU and only run at the mobo speed....

all this is theoretical though, as i have not seen this in the flesh before.... infact... untill now I thought you had to have some discrete logic on the board before you could use the FPU socket....

its groovey to know eh?
Zetr0 is offline  
Old 26 June 2008, 11:31   #23
Yoto
1 Potato to Spam´em all!
 
Yoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lost in a Wine Country
Age: 48
Posts: 572
To:rkauer
Thanks again friend for the schems.
I was not really thinking about adding more memory chips, i was thinking about replacing the ones in the mobo for some 1 ,2 or 4 mb each, it depends on the voltage, maybe the original power source from the dram would have to be increased...i dunno...

Last edited by Yoto; 26 June 2008 at 12:20.
Yoto is offline  
Old 26 June 2008, 12:32   #24
Zetr0
Ya' like it Retr0?
 
Zetr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
@Yotoxi.

There isn't enough chip addressing lines to access more than 2MB of chip ram i am afraid to say.

for extended ram, you have to use the Zorro Bus,
Zetr0 is offline  
Old 26 June 2008, 12:40   #25
Yoto
1 Potato to Spam´em all!
 
Yoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lost in a Wine Country
Age: 48
Posts: 572
To: Zetr0

Yoto is offline  
Old 27 June 2008, 01:58   #26
alphonsus
Registered User
 
alphonsus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetr0 View Post
@Akira

using a ram upgrade i am sure it would still work...

but an accelerator.... maybe not... or if it did, it could slow the system down...

for instance the FPU is governed by the on-board motherboard clock.... if you were running an 030@50mhz.... anytime it encountered FPU arithmetic it would be shunted to the FPU and only run at the mobo speed....

all this is theoretical though, as i have not seen this in the flesh before.... infact... untill now I thought you had to have some discrete logic on the board before you could use the FPU socket....

its groovey to know eh?
The 68k design from 020 onwards allows for 8 processing units on one platform. These can be any combination of main CPUs and FPUs, but a maximum of one MMU (if I've read the wikipedia correctly).
So having an accelerated CPU on card and a motherboard FPU should in principle work but the control logic on each platform will dictate whether it will function or not.
alphonsus is offline  
Old 27 June 2008, 03:37   #27
rkauer
I hate potatos and shirts
 
rkauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sao Leopoldo / Brazil
Age: 58
Posts: 3,482
Send a message via MSN to rkauer Send a message via Yahoo to rkauer
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphonsus View Post
The 68k design from 020 onwards allows for 8 processing units on one platform. These can be any combination of main CPUs and FPUs, but a maximum of one MMU (if I've read the wikipedia correctly).
So having an accelerated CPU on card and a motherboard FPU should in principle work but the control logic on each platform will dictate whether it will function or not.
Hello Alphie.

It depends on how C= routed the CS pin on the Amiga board. If permanent to Vcc, then you can't attach an accelerator to the Amiga who have its own FPU.

BTW: reading the Motorola datasheet, I discovered the 68882 can be used as a coprocessor to the 68000 (and 010) too! Yay!

BTW2: Zetr0 passed me his flu! With no direct contact!

His powers are growing!!!
rkauer is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 00:43   #28
gklinger
Vegetable Lasagna
 
gklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Age: 54
Posts: 711
I was planning on putting a heat sink on my 68060 but I think I better get to work and add them to a bunch of chips just in case.

I may need to find me a sturdy fork.
gklinger is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 01:41   #29
Charlie
. . Mouse . .
 
Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nowhere
Age: 55
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphonsus View Post
My BlizzPPC doesn't have a heatsink on the 040 - 25MHz.

Do people think I should put one on?
There's a fairly practicable way of judging what chips could do with a heatsink:

-Undo the screws.
-Load the 'pute with some software that will make it work hard for a bit.
-Lift the lid & touch her up a bit - - the chip packages, stay away from legs & conductive tracks. Also make sure you earthed yourself FIRST.

-Cool / warm? No worries.
-Hot / Damn hot? Needs a heatsink.

Tips:
-Heatsinks that attach with a sticky pad aren't great - better than nothing.
-Try to use a good thermal goop instead - for Amiga-stuff probably one of the adhesive types.
-Superglue is not a good heat conducter - better than nothing, and what if you want to get that heatsink off again?
-For best performance you can use a high quality goo like Arctic Silver & a couple of tiny dots of superglue @ the corners for mounting. (over the edges, not between HS & chip) - Over-kill?

-Give some thought to airflow when orienting the fins on your heatsink(s) - a small fan sucking air through the case can be a great help - even for chips with no heatsink.
Charlie is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 12:33   #30
alphonsus
Registered User
 
alphonsus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 181
@Charlie

Cheers!
alphonsus is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 12:39   #31
Paul_s
Registered User
 
Paul_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amigaville
Age: 46
Posts: 3,335
No need inside a 1200 imo... those chips probably run way within their temp tolerances.. plus there's no intake/exhaust fan and it'll just end up being one noisy sod if you went that route

68040 upwards/PPC stuff would be the only things I'd bother heatsinking...
Paul_s is offline  
Old 28 July 2008, 18:57   #32
Amiga1992
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul_s View Post
No need inside a 1200 imo... those chips probably run way within their temp tolerances.. plus there's no intake/exhaust fan and it'll just end up being one noisy sod if you went that route

68040 upwards/PPC stuff would be the only things I'd bother heatsinking...

I put inside a slim fan which barely makes any noise.
Amiga1992 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's add heatsinks to those custom chips! 8bitbubsy support.Hardware 42 28 February 2016 07:21
Project: Blizzard 1230 IV - Heat Pipe Cooling System Yoto support.Hardware 45 17 December 2012 05:45
For sale: Blizzard PPC cooling system (heatsink and fans) stachu100 MarketPlace 1 10 August 2010 13:06
Accelerator cooling Anemos Hardware pics 24 23 June 2008 13:45
68030 heatsinks Shrub support.Hardware 6 15 August 2005 23:12

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:42.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.08877 seconds with 13 queries