27 October 2017, 09:24 | #1 |
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Valencia / Spain
Posts: 361
|
Shapeshifter vs Basilisk II on a Rpi3
If one wanted to emulate a Mac on my Raspberry Pi 3, would I be better off using Shapeshifter through Amiga emulator, or the Basilisk II port?
Usually this is not even a question since the native app is mostly always better, but Amibian being so highly optimised and Shapeshifter being so well established software on the Amiga side, could it be that the emulator within emulator could outperform the native app in speed / compatibility / usability in this case? If you've tried them both out, let me know! |
28 October 2017, 01:03 | #2 |
French in Australia
|
There is a BasilikII Port for the Pi? I never managed to get it to work on my PC when ShapeShifter was working like a charm on my A1200...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 October 2017, 12:06 | #3 |
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Valencia / Spain
Posts: 361
|
Yes, and apparently there's even a Sheepshaver port available.
|
29 October 2017, 11:28 | #4 |
French in Australia
|
Interesting!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best options for RPI3 and virtual File | IvanEBC | New to Emulation or Amiga scene | 7 | 15 September 2016 21:53 |
Happiga un Amiga 4040 dans un RPI2b ou RPI3 | razstore | Retrogaming General Discussion | 12 | 14 September 2016 18:55 |
ShapeShifter Help | coope1999 | support.Apps | 17 | 21 July 2015 07:18 |
Shapeshifter vs. Basilisk II? | Amiga1992 | support.Apps | 7 | 01 June 2013 21:25 |
Shapeshifter help! (Again?) | watertonian | support.Apps | 18 | 27 May 2010 18:03 |
|
|