English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 01 February 2016, 22:56   #21
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
You can reach up to 42 MHz without breaking?
alex68 is offline  
Old 01 February 2016, 23:46   #22
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
You can reach up to 42 MHz without breaking?
Until I see some more proof I'll treat that one as an urban legend :-)
I don't think the official Motorola HCMOS parts officially went beyond 20MHz and Supra 28 being an 8Mhz overclock.
Whilr 42MHz maybe was achievable under special circumstances, it seems a bit too high for a commercial product with any kind of warranty...
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 19:08   #23
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
Hello What is the greatest proof that you have seen in mhz?
alex68 is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 20:21   #24
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 5,999
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
Perhaps the 68000 reaches 50 MHz? Which was the maximum reached overclocked MHz range?
Minimig 68k can clock at 50MHz without getting hot.
FOL is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 21:01   #25
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
Hello What is the greatest proof that you have seen in mhz?
I can't say I can remember any 68k part being sold beyond 20MHz rating but obviously there was the 28MHz Supra.
The 36, 40Mhz rumours are AFAIK people overclocking their Supra, not official products...

The MINIMIG uses a 68SEC000 officially not sold above 10MHz I think and some say it's not 100% compatible with a MC68000. However, since this is a newer 3.3V part it's possible there are significantly overclocked parts out there...
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 21:22   #26
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
Hi is as possible that the working 68000 50 MHz, if the serial 68060 50 mhz will ??
alex68 is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 22:39   #27
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
Hi is as possible that the working 68000 50 MHz, if the serial 68060 50 mhz will ??
Not sure I understand what you are asking here...
A 68060 is not a serial number, it's a product designation - a completely new processor that is based on the 68k architecture although vastly more advanced.
Several members of the 68k "family" were officially sold at 50MHz, most common = 68030 and 68060.
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 03 February 2016, 23:27   #28
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
I mean that if the 68000 reaches 50 MHz is very close to the 68060 if I remember correctly this micro reached 66 mhz, why I believe that the 68000 can not reach 50 mhz I guess not happen 24 mhz.
alex68 is offline  
Old 04 February 2016, 01:27   #29
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
I mean that if the 68000 reaches 50 MHz is very close to the 68060 if I remember correctly this micro reached 66 mhz, why I believe that the 68000 can not reach 50 mhz I guess not happen 24 mhz.
There is a lot more to CPU performance than Megahertz ;-)

Go to Wikipedia and read up on the difference between 16 bit vs 32 bit, pipeline length vs frequency, superscalar architecture of the 060 meaning it could execute 2 instructions in parallel. .. use of data and instruction caches etc..

Even 50MHz 030 (which is 32 bit) is nowhere near a 50MHz 060.

The 68000 was manufactured in a large number of different versions and for many years because it was a popular choice for many manufacturers. It is not impossible to imagine a 50MHz 68000 but the performance would not be close to 060 at all..
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 04 February 2016, 14:23   #30
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by eXeler0 View Post
There is a lot more to CPU performance than Megahertz ;-)

Go to Wikipedia and read up on the difference between 16 bit vs 32 bit, pipeline length vs frequency, superscalar architecture of the 060 meaning it could execute 2 instructions in parallel. .. use of data and instruction caches etc..

Even 50MHz 030 (which is 32 bit) is nowhere near a 50MHz 060.

The 68000 was manufactured in a large number of different versions and for many years because it was a popular choice for many manufacturers. It is not impossible to imagine a 50MHz 68000 but the performance would not be close to 060 at all..
It is clear as the 68060 is purely 32-bit, and the 68000 16-bit to 32 bits works internally, I have seen on ebay micros 68000 standard 24 mhz so if you make a got here overclocking margin pretty big. The question is how many mips would have a 68,000-50 mhz? 5 mips?

Note: I do not know if this manufactured by Freescale

Last edited by TCD; 04 February 2016 at 14:24. Reason: Back-to-back posts merged.
alex68 is offline  
Old 04 February 2016, 17:02   #31
Leffmann
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,269
At 50 MHz it would be about 5 MIPS.
Leffmann is offline  
Old 04 February 2016, 18:41   #32
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
Then a 12 mhz is one mip or two?
alex68 is offline  
Old 04 February 2016, 20:20   #33
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
Then a 12 mhz is one mip or two?
MIPS scale fairly predictably with MHz in these cases. It's more complicated with real software.

Also, it's called MIPS even if it's just 1 ;-)
The "s" at the end tells you instructions are measured per "second". (M_illion I_nstructions P_er S_econd)
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 05 February 2016, 18:30   #34
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leffmann View Post
At 50 MHz it would be about 5 MIPS.
10 mhz is one mip? 50mhz:5 mips
alex68 is offline  
Old 06 February 2016, 21:41   #35
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
The MIPS processor are real or depends on many factors?
alex68 is offline  
Old 06 February 2016, 22:17   #36
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
The more mhz more mips ?? Someone can explain me if so? Greetings
alex68 is offline  
Old 08 February 2016, 20:07   #37
gilgamesh
Linux snob
 
gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Monkey Island
Posts: 997
MIPS is Millions Instructions Per Second. So if the CPU is not parallel in some way, its MIPS is simply the product of frequency times cycles per instruction (averaged).
gilgamesh is offline  
Old 12 February 2016, 08:31   #38
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
some practical examples from SysInfo since I have a Blizzard Turbo Mem board in one of my 500s. It has a DIP switch to toggle the 68000 between 7 and 14MHz.

SysInfo reports:
0.74 MIPS @ 7MHz
1.48 MIPS @ 14MHz

so... it scales exactly to double MIPS when frequency is doubled.
eXeler0 is offline  
Old 18 February 2016, 20:28   #39
alex68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 82
http://www.giantbomb.com/neo-geo/3045-25/ neogeo system 68000 12 mhz 2.1 mips
alex68 is offline  
Old 19 February 2016, 08:24   #40
eXeler0
Registered User
 
eXeler0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex68 View Post
http://www.giantbomb.com/neo-geo/3045-25/ neogeo system 68000 12 mhz 2.1 mips
Wikipedia lists it @1.75 MIPS
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_Geo_(system)
Anyhow. . To get a proper comparison, one would preferably run the same benchmarking software on both platforms. Other factors such as speed of memory used could have some impact I think.. Also, one of these claims could simply be wrong. ;-)
eXeler0 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blizzard Motorola 68060 +32MB guru MarketPlace 13 29 August 2011 14:11
Motorola CPUs for sale... amigamaniac MarketPlace 4 04 December 2009 23:48
Motorola 68000 Structured Assembler Manual. Thorham Coders. General 3 16 May 2009 15:16
FS:Motorola 68060 @ 66mhz AMIGAZ MarketPlace 6 05 April 2005 11:14
Motorola 68010 CPU whiteb MarketPlace 0 26 September 2002 05:37

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:10.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.18199 seconds with 15 queries