26 June 2004, 20:54 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 59
|
CPU usage in WinUAE 115% in some AGA games
Hi!
While playing some of the AGA games like for instance Trolls, at some points, I see that the CPU usage rises over 100%, sometimes up to 115%. When this occurs, either the frame rate drops a bit and/or the skips/hick-ups in the sound can be heard. Can anyone tell me why this happens? My computer (Athlon 2000+, 256MB RAM, GForce 5900) should be fast enough. |
26 June 2004, 23:40 | #2 |
Posts: n/a
|
Just a noob @ emulation myself.. but 256MB RAM sounds borderline to me (what Windows Version?) and how much memory are you "signing over" to WinUAE?. CPU Speed and GFXCard match mine, my gut feeling is, get another at least 256 MB RAM for your PC; you wont regret it.
But maybe the experts have some better suggestions for you.. |
27 June 2004, 00:54 | #3 |
Zone Friend
|
Heheh...well try firing up some old demos with old crunchers...here CPU usage goes beyond 400% sometimes. I bet these values should be taken with a grain of salt and not be taken too seriously.
|
27 June 2004, 09:20 | #4 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,506
|
CPU% over 100% means FPS is under 50 (or 60 in NTSC)
25FPS = 200%, 10FPS = 500% etc.. It can't be more simple.. Try enabling JIT to lower CPU usage. (of course some AGA games don't like JIT..) |
27 June 2004, 13:26 | #5 | |
Zone Friend
|
Quote:
Maybe better limit the CPU stuff to 100% and only decrease the FPS value in order not to confuse people? |
|
27 June 2004, 14:14 | #6 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,506
|
Quote:
Even old Amiga game F1GP did the same (O-key during play) |
|
27 June 2004, 16:24 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Malayasia
Age: 43
Posts: 657
|
I think there is a bit of confusion over the CPU usage. I believe WinUAE's value refers to the CPU usage of the emulated Amiga, *not* the usage of your PC's CPU (as the first poster appears to suggest).
|
27 June 2004, 21:25 | #8 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,506
|
It is PC CPU usage.
|
27 June 2004, 21:33 | #9 |
Zone Friend
|
No one can know.
|
27 June 2004, 21:50 | #10 |
Posts: n/a
|
I thought it was the PC CPU usage but didn't reply not to sound like a bitch.
|
27 June 2004, 22:04 | #11 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 9,355
|
Why not have 50fps as 100% (Running at correct speed) then if it slows down then drop it.. so it's proportionate to speed
50% = 25fps (30fps ntsc) etc.. This is easier to understand! |
27 June 2004, 22:14 | #12 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,506
|
Because you can have 50fps even if WinUAE only uses 1% of your PC CPU, for example when nothing happens on screen but it can jump to near 100% when emulating heavy copper effects.
|
28 June 2004, 12:37 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Malayasia
Age: 43
Posts: 657
|
[quote]It is PC CPU usage.[\quote]
Oops, I stand corrected |
28 June 2004, 17:11 | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
Quote:
|
|
28 June 2004, 17:18 | #15 |
Posts: n/a
|
400% = Buy a 4x powerful CPU
|
30 June 2004, 20:55 | #16 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Same here |
|
30 June 2004, 20:56 | #17 | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tight loop causes WinUAE to shoot up to 800% CPU usage | Leffmann | support.WinUAE | 12 | 14 August 2012 18:36 |
Is this Normal cpu usage? | exoticaga | support.WinUAE | 6 | 18 February 2008 09:22 |
WinUAE 1.3.2 - "fastest possible" not at 100% cpu usage? | rsn8887 | support.WinUAE | 12 | 15 October 2006 22:34 |
WinUAE high CPU usage | DeCreator | support.WinUAE | 2 | 17 July 2003 02:12 |
WinUAE CPU usage at 100% argh | wakeupbomb | support.WinUAE | 4 | 23 January 2003 09:27 |
|
|