English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware > Hardware mods

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 15 August 2017, 09:02   #1841
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xicorpt View Post
Thanks, will try the 10ns first. As soon as the cpld's arrives I will post my findings....

Wishes of speedy recovery to plasmab !
About memory:
I think it's good idea - to try different memory chips filtering all parts and prevent other persons doing same mistakes we did..
For now (40Mhz CPU, 50Mhz firmware):
Alliance 15ns chips - working good (7600 Dhrystones)
Alliance 12TIN - working good (9040 Dhrystones)
ISSI -? No info atm

About cpld's:
Have swapped cpld's to 10ns by using hot air soldering station, however, it's a bit tricky with one chip, as FPU Socket is on the way, so You can't use knife soldering tip to reflow the pins after that..

waiting for TF534 wanna run SATA on Amiga
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 15 August 2017, 15:02   #1842
mattymuc
Registered User
 
mattymuc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Munich / Germany
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8 Bit Dreams View Post
waiting for TF534 wanna run SATA on Amiga
Yeah, and 4MB RAM :-) Awesome!
mattymuc is offline  
Old 15 August 2017, 21:45   #1843
kim_jorgensen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8 Bit Dreams View Post
Alliance 15ns chips - working good (7600 Dhrystones)
Alliance 12TIN - working good (9040 Dhrystones)
Is this with the same firmware?
I thought that is was the CPLD alone that controlled the bus timing.
kim_jorgensen is offline  
Old 16 August 2017, 08:48   #1844
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by kim_jorgensen View Post
Is this with the same firmware?
I thought that is was the CPLD alone that controlled the bus timing.
Yes, same 50Mhz firmware, different speed because of timing of the chips: 12ns vs 15ns makes this difference.
Now i am starting to understand the answer on my question on the stream about 45ns RAM IC's. These will have 4Mb of RAM, but will de three times slower than 15ns..

@dragmar
just check this thread - all links to firmwares are present here, i do not own any "special" firmware.
Also check Your Xilinx chip, there are two types of them: 7x and 10x, 7x will NOT working correctly! (i got 24x of them atm, have bought them on Ebay, there was sticker on them that covered that line, (these was already flashed), have populated two boards, both are not working on 40/50Mhz with FPU installed, showing only 7Mhz, however, when i remove FPU it kinda works, but i am unable to run any software.
It seems that there are more persons who own "wrong" cpld's, i wish i was able to help, all we need - is to correct the timings and recompile the firmware, unfortunately i have no idea how to do it as i have nothing to do with programming or soldering in my job - it's just my hobby. I will try to get help later from some person that have a clue how it is doable, or maybe Stephen will find some mojo to do this if we all start to cry ang begging him will see..
Atm is better to watch out, and avoid 7ns CPLD's and 68881 FPU's.
About 68882:
it is not so transparent:
i have bought a lot of five FPU's from this seller:
http://www.ebay.de/itm/5pcs-MC68882F...L/251245225321
Production stamp say's: 1C12R none of these five is working! Getting light yellow or black screen with them. Got refunded today.
However, i got another 3x pieces from other seller WITH THE SAME time stamp: two chips worked right out of the package, third had corroded pins, this IC started to work after cleaning.
hope it is usefull info for some of You
kind regards,
Viktor

Last edited by 8 Bit Dreams; 16 August 2017 at 20:21.
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 16 August 2017, 19:46   #1845
plasmab
Banned
 
plasmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by kim_jorgensen View Post
Is this with the same firmware?

I thought that is was the CPLD alone that controlled the bus timing.


Me too? V confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
plasmab is offline  
Old 16 August 2017, 20:57   #1846
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmab View Post
Me too? V confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i have no other explanations to this, except 12ns vs 15ns timings:
http://eab.abime.net/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1783
http://eab.abime.net/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1817
both cards have 48.40Mhz frequency and same firmware, however, different memory chips
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 16 August 2017, 23:33   #1847
Stedy
Registered User
 
Stedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 46
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmab View Post
Me too? V confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Am I missing something but after re-building the TF530 design from the Github sources and doing a post layout timing analysis, I get errors, see attached.

Have you tweaked anything in the UCF files for the JED files you supply for different speed bins?

BTW, using faster -7 CPLDs should not matter, you can always go to a faster grade, never a slower one as the part number details the maximum speed, which this design should not hit.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	tf530_RAM_timing_failures.JPG
Views:	208
Size:	284.0 KB
ID:	54237  
Stedy is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 07:07   #1848
Tachyon
OG Amiga user
 
Tachyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Edmonton/Canada
Posts: 73
Tin Whiskers

Reason 103 I don't use lead free solder. ;')

https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/photos/index.html
Tachyon is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 08:24   #1849
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stedy View Post
Am I missing something but after re-building the TF530 design from the Github sources and doing a post layout timing analysis, I get errors, see attached.

Have you tweaked anything in the UCF files for the JED files you supply for different speed bins?

BTW, using faster -7 CPLDs should not matter, you can always go to a faster grade, never a slower one as the part number details the maximum speed, which this design should not hit.
In my case 7ns cpld's isn't working of fully populated board. Withiut FPU it kinda works, however, i can not run any programs/games
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 09:43   #1850
plasmab
Banned
 
plasmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stedy View Post
Am I missing something but after re-building the TF530 design from the Github sources and doing a post layout timing analysis, I get errors, see attached.



Have you tweaked anything in the UCF files for the JED files you supply for different speed bins?



BTW, using faster -7 CPLDs should not matter, you can always go to a faster grade, never a slower one as the part number details the maximum speed, which this design should not hit.


Nope. I just specked the clock timings. I ramped them up as the clocks go up. The 530 source on GitHub is old.

Virtually everything in the design is synced off clock edges so I'm confused.

I call BS on the speed differences with different RAM speeds because the RAM doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with the timing acknowledge. That's completely fixed by the CPLD. I could believe that you may be able to run faster clocks but you haven't done the test you think you have if try different ram speeds and get different answers. Repeat the test 20 times for each and take an average and I bet you get the same.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
plasmab is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 20:38   #1851
oggie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Quispamsis
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmab View Post
Nope. I just specked the clock timings. I ramped them up as the clocks go up. The 530 source on GitHub is old.

Virtually everything in the design is synced off clock edges so I'm confused.

I call BS on the speed differences with different RAM speeds because the RAM doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with the timing acknowledge. That's completely fixed by the CPLD. I could believe that you may be able to run faster clocks but you haven't done the test you think you have if try different ram speeds and get different answers. Repeat the test 20 times for each and take an average and I bet you get the same.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If the source on github is old, are you planning on updating it? How do we get the most recent? Search this thread?

Thanks
oggie is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 22:41   #1852
plasmab
Banned
 
plasmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
Terrible Fire Accelerators

The jeds are up to date. The actions of various folk rerouting my boards has made me rethink my open source policy.

Essentially I would be happy with someone deriving a new product that adds value .. but a "look at me.. I can make a board and pretend I designed it" annoys me enough that I'm making people comprehend the HDL side of things to hit 50Mhz. Not just recompile my work and pretend they did it

The core is there if you want to derive and the jeds are there if you want to manufacture. But if you want your own design you'll need to understand it all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
plasmab is offline  
Old 17 August 2017, 22:49   #1853
Chucky
Registered User
 
Chucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Karlstad / Sweden
Age: 52
Posts: 1,210
I understand what you are saying.. but hey.. most of us now know that this stuff is yours.. and they are just morons..
Chucky is offline  
Old 18 August 2017, 00:54   #1854
Xicorpt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tachyon View Post
Reason 103 I don't use lead free solder. ;')

https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/photos/index.html
Mind blowing, will have that in mind for my next doomsday device ....
Xicorpt is offline  
Old 18 August 2017, 06:26   #1855
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
@Stephen:
As far i know - only Keeper2k has rerouted Your board making 4 layered one..
Did You tried ISSI memory on Rev.3? I didn't understood what do You mean, saying this board doesn't work on the last stream..No memory detected? CPU isn't booting?
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 18 August 2017, 08:02   #1856
plasmab
Banned
 
plasmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8 Bit Dreams View Post
@Stephen:
As far i know - only Keeper2k has rerouted Your board making 4 layered one..
Did You tried ISSI memory on Rev.3? I didn't understood what do You mean, saying this board doesn't work on the last stream..No memory detected? CPU isn't booting?


Others have rerouted the TF530. They've taken copyright notices off too. But if they've changed the CPLD pinouts they're stuck at 20Mhz and if they haven't I can force them to open their sources.

I started to build a Rev 3 but I think I fried the clock circuit or I've got a short somewhere. CPU isn't starting... haven't had time to debug.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
plasmab is offline  
Old 18 August 2017, 13:39   #1857
Black68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Spain
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Flibble View Post
Just a quick update, I built up one of the relocator boards - it's a touch tricky soldering around the socket overlap, but do-able with plenty of flux and going sparingly with the solder.

You might need to bend/resolder the cap at C816 otherwise it'll stop the board going into the cpu socket properly, but clearance looks good up to the big caps at the top of the board.

Just going to check clearance for closing the case now...

Edit: Looks good - keyboard is well clear, no issues closing the case - pics to follow.

Edit 2: Pics attached.
Would it be possible to buy one riser PCB from yours? Thanks in advance!
Black68 is offline  
Old 19 August 2017, 12:34   #1858
Mr.Flibble
Registered User
 
Mr.Flibble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black68 View Post
Would it be possible to buy one riser PCB from yours? Thanks in advance!
You can either order them from Easy EDA (https://easyeda.com/order) using the Gerber files on my github, or you can order them via DirtyPCB's from the following link:
http://dirtypcbs.com/store/designer/...-gerbers-1-zip

At the moment, Easy EDA is far cheaper at $2 + postage, but DirtyPCBs you can just order from and not worry about the gerbers/setup etc.
Mr.Flibble is offline  
Old 19 August 2017, 12:43   #1859
8 Bit Dreams
Retro maniac
 
8 Bit Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Munich / Germany
Posts: 485
Hi,
I have some Mr.Flibble's relocator pcb's left. Also some ready built
Also ready built TF530 running @50Mhz
Postage 4€ as surface mail or 6.50€ tracked and insured anywhere in the world
8 Bit Dreams is offline  
Old 28 August 2017, 23:32   #1860
plasmab
Banned
 
plasmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 2,917
All: I have just (finally) submitted the TF534S to the boardhouse..

Sata + 4Mb + Z3 version of the 530.
plasmab is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Listening to Amiga music with too much treble makes it sound terrible! Foebane Amiga scene 4 08 October 2016 06:30
Terrible usb drive performance? lovinggames support.FS-UAE 5 11 March 2015 09:06
Broken MASPlayer - Terrible hissing. SS454 support.Hardware 8 17 November 2013 01:41
Accelerators pmc MarketPlace 9 04 November 2009 20:23
Problem with a terrible, simply effect! Camionsauro Coders. General 13 19 April 2009 08:53

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:58.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.21637 seconds with 16 queries