WinUAE 4.9.0 beta series (Was 4.5.0)

[DamienD]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

winuae.7z updated. Run with log window open.

Just ran Heretic & Hexen with this latest update with log window and full logging enabled.

Game still crashes for me; as with all 4.5.0 betas after JIT changes.

I'm sure you don't care as it's a PC port, but logs in The Zone! anyway.

[Toni Wilen]

Originally Posted by DamienD

Just ran Heretic & Hexen with this latest update with log window and full logging enabled.

Game still crashes for me; as with all 4.5.0 betas after JIT changes.

I'm sure you don't care as it's a PC port, but logs in The Zone! anyway.

Test version is only for Virge 3D testing.

[Mad-Matt]

I don't see any fifo messages. Although when I download winuae.7z it still has the yesterdays build date so not sure if I have the right file.

I've also noted if I hold enter to cancel all the hpos error windows it eventually sorts it self out for a few frames before the hpos error returns and goes through the cycle again.

[Toni Wilen]

Try again later/clear browser cache. This has happened previously many times.

[Mad-Matt]

I've tested last nights build now and did not see any fifo messages at all.

[rutra80]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

Try again later/clear browser cache. This has happened previously many times.

Refreshing via CTRL+F5 might help...

[Toni Wilen]

Testing needed with following setup: CV64/3D (or any already emulated RTG board) + CGX + and demo XIII (https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=4389).

Does it run smoothly in any (real) setup when using Cybergraphics option? At least CGX4 version I have does not seem to handle VGA vsync interrupt correctly which results in long pauses between frames. Picasso96 works fine.

If it works (both real and emulated): which WB/KS/CGX combination?

EDIT: demo needs 320x240x8 resolution.

[AMIGASYSTEM]

Toni I tested the Demo XIII and it seems to go well, tested with OS 3.5 CV 64/3D and OS 3.9 BB4+AfA OS CV 64/3D

I enclose a small exhaustive video:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19G3...ew?usp=sharing

[Toni Wilen]

Did you miss the "CGX" part?

[AMIGASYSTEM]

Explain to me Toni, what I miss exactly and what I should do.

On the OS I used I installed CyberGraphX v4 42.0 + update CyberGraphX_4.3rc4/5/6

[Mad-Matt]

The demo is working with the erratic framefrste as already noted with cgfx v4. Its not just with this demo though. The same chopiness is happing in workbench and w3d software.

Also, this demo seems to cause the hpos crashes in Beta 4 and 5 so its nothing really to do with w3d as first thought. I'm having to stick to beta3 to avoid those crashes.

I can test the demo on my actual amiga over the weekend (its not often I bring it out) but I dont expect it to have any issues. (Bvision/CGXv4)

[Toni Wilen]

Originally Posted by AMIGASYSTEM

Explain to me Toni, what I miss exactly and what I should do.

On the OS I used I installed CyberGraphX v4 42.0 + update CyberGraphX_4.3rc4/5/6

You didn't mention CGX version. And 4/5/6 does not sound very exact either..

Originally Posted by Mad-Matt

The demo is working with the erratic framefrste as already noted with cgfx v4. Its not just with this demo though. The same chopiness is happing in workbench and w3d software.

Also, this demo seems to cause the hpos crashes in Beta 4 and 5 so its nothing really to do with w3d as first thought. I'm having to stick to beta3 to avoid those crashes.

I can test the demo on my actual amiga over the weekend (its not often I bring it out) but I dont expect it to have any issues. (Bvision/CGXv4)

I still can't duplicate any crashes. BVision is not in listed cards so testing with it won't help.

EDIT: Do you have exact same CGX4 version (check internal versions to confirm it) in real and emulated configs?

[Zilog]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

...............

EDIT: demo needs 320x240x8 resolution.

Toni,
with Cybergraphics, how active the resolution 320x240, with cybergrahics v4 rc6 i have only 640x480 or more.


Thanks a lot.

[Mad-Matt]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

EDIT: Do you have exact same CGX4 version (check internal versions to confirm it) in real and emulated configs?

Yes I use the same system on my actual machine. C

Installed libraries:
cgxsystem.library 42.7 (68K mode)

1 graphics device(s) installed

DEVICES:
CyberVision64/3D: Driver Version 4.4 (68K mode)
Prod=8512/67($2140/$43)
BaseName=CV64/3D
CardID=13($d) Number=1($1)
Developed by phase5 digital products

Is that autoconfig 8512/67 anything to be concerned about? could it be confusing the driver? the same id is used when selecting either the zii or ziii card in uae.

From Hardware Database site :- http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/cybervision643d

A2000 Interface Zorro II Autoconfig ID 8512/67
A3000, A4000 Interface Zorro III 8512/50

[Toni Wilen]

Originally Posted by Mad-Matt

Yes I use the same system on my actual machine. C

Installed libraries:
cgxsystem.library 42.7 (68K mode)

1 graphics device(s) installed

DEVICES:
CyberVision64/3D: Driver Version 4.4 (68K mode)
Prod=8512/67($2140/$43)
BaseName=CV64/3D
CardID=13($d) Number=1($1)
Developed by phase5 digital products

Is that autoconfig 8512/67 anything to be concerned about? could it be confusing the driver? the same id is used when selecting either the zii or ziii card in uae.

From Hardware Database site :- http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/cybervision643d

A2000 Interface Zorro II Autoconfig ID 8512/67
A3000, A4000 Interface Zorro III 8512/50

Don't trust amiga.resource.cx autoconfig IDs. There are many mistakes. (Some even quite simple ones, like same ID both in decimal and hexadecimal format)

At least Picasso96 driver only checks for ID=67 for both models.

Originally Posted by Zilog

Toni,
with Cybergraphics, how active the resolution 320x240, with cybergrahics v4 rc6 i have only 640x480 or more.

Run CGXMode (that comes with CGX) and configure 320x240. (and first set monitor type to some high frequency one to prevent disabled higher resolutions)

[Seiya]

A4000, Cybervision64/3D ZorroIII, 128 MB, 8 MB Motherboard RAM, 68040

[ Show youtube player ]

[Toni Wilen]

Strange results...

I have another CGX4 installation (same CGX4, same WB) but XIII runs perfectly smoothly.

Perhaps the problem isn't CGX or the demo but something else. Need to check if there are any other differences.


EDIT: Demo runs smoothly if KEEPAMIGAVIDEO and 56KHZAUDIO are ticked in prefs/CyberGraphicsX. Weird.

[Zilog]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

Testing needed with following setup: CV64/3D (or any already emulated RTG board) + CGX + and demo XIII
......

Conf,
Amiga 4000 - 68060 - JIT OFF
Os 3.1
CBV64 / 3D
CyberGraghics v4.3 rc6

not good result....whithout sync block demo and crush winaue; with sync i have error "h4...?"...in atthacment the log.

....it works for everyone but me?

Note: if interesting i have a problem too picasso96

Without Sync.zip
With Sycn.zip

[Toni Wilen]

Does it happen with other boards too? (CV64 or PicassoIV?)
Does anything change if you configure 320x240 without doublescan in CGXMode?

[Zilog]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

Does it happen with other boards too? (CV64 or PicassoIV?)
Does anything change if you configure 320x240 without doublescan in CGXMode?

(CV64 or PicassoIV?) test in progress....

320x240 already create in normal , no doublesca.

I retest with doublescan?