Natami on Wikipedia nominated for Deletion

digiflip · 11 June 2011, 21:34

just noticed this on amiga.org

http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58103

I wonder what Natami fans will do?

lol maybe they should setup a e-petition ie to save there wikipedia page from deletion

gilgamesh · 11 June 2011, 22:03

How about adding some background information to the page? In its current form I can understand why people wonder what the fuss is all about.

Jope · 12 June 2011, 11:33

How about thinking of more constructive things to do than fighting wikipedia deletionists.

Paul_s · 12 June 2011, 15:47

Don't know what all the fuss is about, it's only Wikipedia which ain't exactly the fountain of knowledge!

Xenon · 13 June 2011, 06:25

digiflip, stop trolling, please....

1time · 13 June 2011, 16:53

Could someone please explain why all the hate against Natami?

And Natami actually exist as a prototype which should allow it on wikipedia.

Jope · 13 June 2011, 21:13

Hate? If anything, I hate Wikipedia and the deletionist assholes who seem to run the site.

1time · 13 June 2011, 21:15

Jope: Totally agree with your opinion. At Amiga.org most ppl think that it should be deleted. And a disagree on that one.

Galahad/FLT · 13 June 2011, 21:21

Wikipedia is there for anything and everything, from the nearly machines to the failed machines.

Even if it only existed as a concept, its still valid information to be included in Wikipedia.

Should we now delete details of the Konix Multisystem because it didn't go into production?

1time · 13 June 2011, 21:27

I am so glad I was not alone to think it was silly.

CritAnime · 13 June 2011, 21:37

I have never taken Wikipedia as anything other than a source of slightly useful information. But it strikes me odd at how they handle their deletion and editing process works. When they want to delete something that could be considered slightly useful and yet leave other rubbish on.

Skope · 13 June 2011, 21:50

Wikipedia is run by a bunch of snobs. Who gives a shit what they're doing. If I wanted info on Natami then I would head over to the official Natami site. I definately would not go and do a search on Wikipedia. So delete it, what does it matter anyway.

gilgamesh · 13 June 2011, 22:14

Why this Wikipedia bashing? Of course you can always read the primary sources, but that does not make encyclopedias redundant. The quality of the articles at Wikipedia differs greatly (that on Natami is rubbish), but you are always welcome to improve them. I don't see the point of your criticism.

1time · 13 June 2011, 22:50

Religion is faith based on the idea of one or more gods, spirits, transcendent soul or other supernatural phenomena.

Is there evidence of a god, spirit or soul has ever existed or does exist today? I Suggest that we remove all the god, spirit and souls from the source until the fact is presented in such a way that no doubt can arise.

Just as silly as the text I just wrote, just as silly is this discussion.

gilgamesh · 13 June 2011, 22:56

Nice try. You nearly got me started on political religions.

1time · 13 June 2011, 23:02

Dont know what you are trying to prove.

If you dont like a article. You dont need to add it for deletion since maybe someone else thinks it is interesting.

Its like the 80 year old ppl calling the TV studio and complaining about the weather mans tie. Get over it, and move on.

Well, over and out for me on this "Lets delete things just because i dont like it".

gilgamesh · 13 June 2011, 23:14

Trying to prove that I

like Wikipedia
don't like unfair criticism of Wikipedia
don't agree with the implications of your previous comment

The reoccurring deletion debates are conceptual flaw in Wikipedia, outweighed by its merits, and probably soon amended.

TCD · 14 June 2011, 00:30

Meh, pointless thread is pointless. Closing time methinks.

11 June 2011, 21:34	#1
digiflip Registered User Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Nottingham, United Kingdom Posts: 142	Natami on Wikipedia nominated for Deletion just noticed this on amiga.org http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58103 I wonder what Natami fans will do? lol maybe they should setup a e-petition ie to save there wikipedia page from deletion

13 June 2011, 23:14	#17
gilgamesh Linux snob Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Monkey Island Posts: 997	Trying to prove that I like Wikipedia don't like unfair criticism of Wikipedia don't agree with the implications of your previous comment The reoccurring deletion debates are conceptual flaw in Wikipedia, outweighed by its merits, and probably soon amended.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Deletion of Users Comments and Threads	Peter	project.EAB	72	05 September 2013 00:23
Wikipedia Article	Parsec	Retrogaming General Discussion	2	24 January 2006 09:45
Wikipedia game	fiath	Looking for a game name ?	6	27 October 2004 18:17

11 June 2011, 22:03	#2
gilgamesh Linux snob Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Monkey Island Posts: 997	How about adding some background information to the page? In its current form I can understand why people wonder what the fuss is all about.

12 June 2011, 11:33	#3
Jope - Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Helsinki / Finland Age: 43 Posts: 9,861	How about thinking of more constructive things to do than fighting wikipedia deletionists.

12 June 2011, 15:47	#4
Paul_s Registered User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Amigaville Age: 46 Posts: 3,334	Don't know what all the fuss is about, it's only Wikipedia which ain't exactly the fountain of knowledge!

13 June 2011, 06:25	#5
Xenon Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Zaragoza, Pamplona-Iruña, Bera Age: 42 Posts: 444	digiflip, stop trolling, please....

13 June 2011, 16:53	#6
1time Amiga Lover Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Stockholm / Sweden Age: 46 Posts: 612	Could someone please explain why all the hate against Natami? And Natami actually exist as a prototype which should allow it on wikipedia.

13 June 2011, 21:13	#7
Jope - Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Helsinki / Finland Age: 43 Posts: 9,861	Hate? If anything, I hate Wikipedia and the deletionist assholes who seem to run the site.

13 June 2011, 21:15	#8
1time Amiga Lover Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Stockholm / Sweden Age: 46 Posts: 612	Jope: Totally agree with your opinion. At Amiga.org most ppl think that it should be deleted. And a disagree on that one.

13 June 2011, 21:21	#9
Galahad/FLT Going nowhere Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: United Kingdom Age: 50 Posts: 8,986	Wikipedia is there for anything and everything, from the nearly machines to the failed machines. Even if it only existed as a concept, its still valid information to be included in Wikipedia. Should we now delete details of the Konix Multisystem because it didn't go into production?

13 June 2011, 21:27	#10
1time Amiga Lover Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Stockholm / Sweden Age: 46 Posts: 612	I am so glad I was not alone to think it was silly.

13 June 2011, 21:37	#11
CritAnime Registered User Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Wakefield/UK Age: 41 Posts: 387	I have never taken Wikipedia as anything other than a source of slightly useful information. But it strikes me odd at how they handle their deletion and editing process works. When they want to delete something that could be considered slightly useful and yet leave other rubbish on.

13 June 2011, 21:50	#12
Skope Protracker Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: 8364 Posts: 381	Wikipedia is run by a bunch of snobs. Who gives a shit what they're doing. If I wanted info on Natami then I would head over to the official Natami site. I definately would not go and do a search on Wikipedia. So delete it, what does it matter anyway.

13 June 2011, 22:14	#13
gilgamesh Linux snob Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Monkey Island Posts: 997	Why this Wikipedia bashing? Of course you can always read the primary sources, but that does not make encyclopedias redundant. The quality of the articles at Wikipedia differs greatly (that on Natami is rubbish), but you are always welcome to improve them. I don't see the point of your criticism.

13 June 2011, 22:50	#14
1time Amiga Lover Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Stockholm / Sweden Age: 46 Posts: 612	Religion is faith based on the idea of one or more gods, spirits, transcendent soul or other supernatural phenomena. Is there evidence of a god, spirit or soul has ever existed or does exist today? I Suggest that we remove all the god, spirit and souls from the source until the fact is presented in such a way that no doubt can arise. Just as silly as the text I just wrote, just as silly is this discussion.

13 June 2011, 22:56	#15
gilgamesh Linux snob Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Monkey Island Posts: 997	Nice try. You nearly got me started on political religions.

13 June 2011, 23:02	#16
1time Amiga Lover Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Stockholm / Sweden Age: 46 Posts: 612	Dont know what you are trying to prove. If you dont like a article. You dont need to add it for deletion since maybe someone else thinks it is interesting. Its like the 80 year old ppl calling the TV studio and complaining about the weather mans tie. Get over it, and move on. Well, over and out for me on this "Lets delete things just because i dont like it".

14 June 2011, 00:30	#18
TCD HOL/FTP busy bee Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Germany Age: 46 Posts: 31,525	Meh, pointless thread is pointless. Closing time methinks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)