20 February 2008, 19:59 | #81 | |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 8,987
|
Quote:
Coupled with the fact that a lot of films in HD are going to look crap as the deficiencies in some of the special effects are all too clear to see. From what I can gather , Terminator 2 looks quite bad in HD. HD is too soon, DVD still has plenty of life in it, and thats part of Blu-Rays problems right there, most people will think "I'm not spending silly money on a player and a TV and the discs just for better picture quality", because for some films, the "better quality" will actually look worse because DVD's lower resolution is kinder to older effects. |
|
20 February 2008, 20:40 | #82 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,287
|
T2 looks quite bad on normal TV now, the effects haven't aged well.
The more blu-ray sells, the cheaper it will get. DVDs didn't come out at less than a tenner each either. |
20 February 2008, 20:43 | #83 | |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,059
|
Quote:
HD picture is clearer, but not that much that my ol' eye can spot all the differences. (that's why I don't complain with DivX ) @Paul_s - you got it all right girl! @Ian - paid 5 US $ for special extended edition T2 DVD last summer. |
|
20 February 2008, 20:55 | #84 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,287
|
If you cannot see the difference you must be blind
http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.ph...71&postcount=5 Look at some of the images in the links and tell me again you cannot really see the difference. Sure if you watch a blu-ray and then the DVD version after you might not notice, but side by side and you can tell a mile off. Even old films look significatly better in HD than SD. |
20 February 2008, 21:28 | #85 |
Super Robot Pilot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Modena (Italy)
Age: 48
Posts: 870
|
Not only BD wins over HD-DVD, but Sony decrared that in any movies in BD format you will find too a low-res version, ready to be transfered in a Memory Stick Duo and played with a PSP.
EDIT: I ever thinked that BD would win, and thank you to PS3. PS3 comes with as a "cheap" BD player other than a console. Many people bought it for both functions. Last edited by MazinKaesar; 20 February 2008 at 21:34. |
20 February 2008, 21:53 | #86 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cambridge
Age: 42
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's a bit like MP3s. If you were to flick between a CD version and an MP3 version of the same song, the MP3 sounds really bad. But listen to it by itself and most people can't tell the difference. I agree with those who have said that HD disc formats were launched way too early. |
||
20 February 2008, 21:57 | #87 | |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,059
|
Quote:
IMHO, DVD blurred version looks better, as you got more focus on what's going on instead of this BD detail insanity. Just take a look at first screen of blade runner and tell me which version looks more realistic, BD or DVD. IMHO DVD looks better. And just because Sony fucked up with Lik-Sang I hope Sony will fail and get out of console business and Ian will become Nintendo-gay-boy. |
|
20 February 2008, 22:05 | #88 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London / Sydney
Age: 47
Posts: 20,420
|
|
20 February 2008, 22:31 | #89 | |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,059
|
This seems to be interesting...
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2008, 22:43 | #90 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Moorpark, California
Age: 44
Posts: 1,153
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2008, 22:53 | #91 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: -
Posts: 1,689
|
|
21 February 2008, 00:17 | #92 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 446
|
Maybe Toshiba lost out because they had other plans.
Either way both corps have their problems and bad customer and service relations. At least now we can move on with high capacity media. Roll on the third party manufactures, who will make this available and cheap enough for us all to buy. Lets hope the media doesn't turn out as exspensive as dvd dual layer media is. If so it will be a great set back, with little sales. If hardware and media is cheap and plentiful it will be bought buy everyone. I see another few years yet before i buy into it. I need the prices that are the current dvd hardware and media as is now. I'm more for many hardware recorder drives for pcs and loads of media blank disks, while only one or two hardware recorder drives for the home is needed. The industry needs get their brains in gear. With cheaper hardware and media will equal vast instant profit turnover. |
21 February 2008, 10:15 | #93 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Moorpark, California
Age: 44
Posts: 1,153
|
Quote:
As far as I can see this just offers a better picture. Most of it is a case of the emperor's new clothes for techies who only know the advantages of one format over another because they know how the format works. I mean some of the claims on here of a higher bitrate or menus that aren't pre-encoded being of any interest to joe public are truly hilarious. As far as I'm concerned, we're now in to audiophile and videophile territory. Good luck with your 'superb' picture! |
|
22 February 2008, 11:38 | #94 |
crusader of light
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Stone, Staffordshire.
Posts: 1,151
|
|
22 February 2008, 12:24 | #95 |
. . Mouse . .
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nowhere
Age: 55
Posts: 1,792
|
Feel the Passion!
This thread has lasted longer than I expected... FWIW: I guess I may eventually buy a blu-ray player but this is ONLY going to happen when a significant proportion of films I want are no-longer released on DVD. And that assumes in 5-10 years time there isn't a MUCH more worthy 'upgrade'. Why? -Sony - at the risk of being a misery I'm too p*ssed to support them these days. -DRM - another monkey on my back. It's a freedom-related issue that doesn't just relate to films... and: -Why bother? Well done DivX's look more than good enough on my projector, never mind DVD quality being 'better' than that. Too many of my favorite films look WORSE in HD. I know b-r is an improvement over DVD but I'm never going to notice without a side-by-side comparison. I'll also have to upgrade ALL my stuff to take advantage of it. (not going to happen any time soon) Oh, yes. Why do I want yet another d*mn box cluttering my house (unless it's a retro box ) when I'm already migrating all my media to the HDDs on my 'media server'..? Did I mention money yet? For me I just don't see the point. |
22 February 2008, 13:12 | #96 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,287
|
I bet when DVD came out there were similar whinges from moaning old gits
DVD was out for ages before people decided they wanted it. It's going to be the same this time. People don't like change even when it's good for them. Trust me, if you have an LCD HDTV you will notice how much better HD content looks than SD. You can see every flaw in the compression. When I first watched a DVD on it I thought my TV must be broke it was that bad. It wasn't until I searched on the internet that I found out it was normal. If you have a HD TV, you need HD content. It's a simple as that. |
22 February 2008, 14:28 | #97 |
uber cool demi god
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kent/England
Posts: 2,073
|
You're gonna think I'm attacking you now but I'm honestly not, standard definition looks awesome on my HD TV, which btw is a Sony Bravia KDL-40V2000. Yes if you're sitting a metre away from the screen there are noticeable artefacts but who sits a metre away from a 40" tv?
|
22 February 2008, 14:39 | #98 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: swindon
Posts: 148
|
bull
well blue ray won what a surprise ,but unfortunatly i beleive the wqy to go is on micro mmc cards m,this would cut packaging down to size as i thought we supposed to be helping the enviroment these days.
and i beleive that al this extra packaging and size of things are a waste of time,we only need a HD micro card player . |
22 February 2008, 15:12 | #99 | |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,287
|
Quote:
I can understand you putting up with content that isn't as good while the prices are in the high "new technology" bracket, but I ask you, just how quickly did you jump on the DVD bandwagon? Did you buy one of the first DVDs for the same price Blu-Ray players sell for or did you wait... First DVD player we had in our house was my PS2. There is a huge quality difference between DVD and HD (far greater than the difference between VHS and DVD). Fine if people don't like the fact Sony "won", just say that, but don't start with HD isn't needed, that much of a difference or other such crap because the more HDTVs that are sold the more people aren't going to want DVDs to play on them. |
|
22 February 2008, 15:54 | #100 | |
Ancient User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GREECE
Age: 50
Posts: 757
|
Quote:
There is now reason why SD wouldn't look "awesome" (for SD standards) on an HD set... but seeing HD on HD is a complete other story. They are not even close (contrary to what people say about distances etc.). Watch something HD for 10 min. and then immediately go back to SD (even a good quality DVD)... everything will look blurry. Yes we got used to blurriness all those years, but that doesn't make it "reality". |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want to start ray-tracing | watertonian | support.Apps | 48 | 27 January 2014 09:38 |
Re-used pictures (stupid thread :) psygnosis wins | Chain | support.Games | 4 | 09 May 2007 09:43 |
Digital Leisure to Bring 'Dragon's Lair' to Blu-ray | Dizzy | Retrogaming General Discussion | 5 | 27 March 2007 00:20 |
GP32 BLU amiga emulation | Gluttony | New to Emulation or Amiga scene | 3 | 28 August 2005 15:47 |
Who dares wins | Mad Mark | request.Old Rare Games | 4 | 28 February 2003 13:15 |
|
|