English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Main > Amiga scene

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 04 March 2010, 19:27   #21
BuZz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oxford / UK
Age: 47
Posts: 583
Send a message via ICQ to BuZz
Quote:
hello. this is *-*** telling you to piss off and do your own samples because i am fucking sick of all these lamers ripping my chip-instruments. for all your notice: i created the idea of chipmusic using soundtracker. so why dont you credit me once you guys
Although not the origins of the term perhaps, one talented musician certainly though he was the first to do chip sounds in soundtracker. Although I'm not sure such a claim could ever be verified.

*plug* lots of stuff to be read using the instruments search at http://www.modland.com
BuZz is offline  
Old 04 March 2010, 20:26   #22
goto80
 
Posts: n/a
@BuZz: thanks, i never noticed that search function, great stuff! i think most of us claimed too much back in the days, and i dont think that *-*** feels like this. afaik, duz and turtle did it around the same time.

here's another inventor of chipmusic: [ Show youtube player ]

 
Old 22 August 2010, 09:41   #23
Skope
Protracker
 
Skope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 8364
Posts: 381
The first time I heard chip-music that wasn't made in any synthetic tracker but in a "normal" tracker (sound-, noise, protracker) was 4-Mat's tune in that Skid Row crack intro (the name of the mod escapes me). I wanna recall that he called this type of music 'MTS'-music, short for 'Multi Tone System' or something, whatever that means.

When I tried to rip it I was actually pretty amazed to find out that it was a noisetracker mod.

The chip-music term came much later, and as for synthetic mods we just called them "synthmoduler" (swedish for synth mods). I think we used the term 'chip-mods' to describe mods that were chipmem-friendly, but that was probably just our local definition. (:
Skope is offline  
Old 22 August 2010, 13:06   #24
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by goto80 View Post
@photon: if a definition of chipmusic does not include protracker chip modules, i am a bit sceptical. apart from the difficulty of defining it in terms of hardware/software, chipmusic has expanded during the past decade to become a pop phenomenon, where technology/history is often irrelevant. ie, it's a socially constructed genre like any other. perhaps it always was.
Yeah, popular names for things, especially names of musical genres are often (mis)labeled or (mis)used by people that go by other things than definitions. For example, a studio producer would go "Are you crazy? This is not 'disco'. this is not 'eurodisco'. this is house!" because he is more experienced and hear the telltale signatures. Or old people calling all pop music since 1995 'techno'

In normal music it's quite a bit more fuzzy than in the scene, though.

I'm having a hard time conceding that a PT module is a chip tune because it has very short looped samples. It could be just a size-optimized regular module. At which point does it become a chiptune, or even a chip module? The protracker playroutine is not a chiptune player, like the SIDmon etc players, nor is it a module player "that can also play chiptunes". It has zero extra or special code in it to facilitate waveforms, noise, envelopes, filtering, and other features of sound-chips.

The alternative way to making sense of it is to make chiptunes a full-blown, regular genre, of course. But then you must go only by the sound of it and not by any technical features in it. And then if someone makes a track with SIDmon that doesn't "sound like a C-64 song/chiptune" but just uses SIDmon to get that lovely lead guitar sound and the rest is great drum and string samples for a kickass metal song (for example) - is NOT a chiptune Which seems weird.

Galway, Rob Hubbard et al made classical, pop, rock, synth etc genre songs as best they could using the SID chip - still at least I would call every single one of them a chiptune. Nah, I'm still supportive of the definition that there must be code in the editor/player to support the creation and playback of instrument 'envelopes', ie. either code to program a real chip or code to emulate what such a chip can do.

There's a third way - to go by the composer's intent. If he set out to emulate a sound of a chiptune using whatever features the music editor supports, it's a chiptune. If he knows enough to put in the cues the audience expect from the chiptune genre, otherwise it's something else...

Making definitions that hold up under scrutiny is hard Usually it depends on how big an a$$hole the scrutinizer wants to be


You could relax and make it easy and say, "I know a chiptune when I hear one", but that's not a definition


For discussion (if you like): When does a chiptune stop being a chiptune?
Size? (Is a 2 MB tune that sounds like a chiptune a chiptune? 90KB?)
Adding a sampled instrument or effect? (Is f.ex. an .mp3 made in Reason with synth sounds sampled from a C-64 or Roland synth a chiptune, if it sounds like one?)
Adding vocals? (Ie. chiptune in protracker with sampled rap phrases, is that a chiptune?)
Photon is offline  
Old 22 August 2010, 14:03   #25
Photon
Moderator
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,602
Hm, a lot of typing for no good reason. The part about using terms before knowing enough to explain what you mean when you use them giving rise to confusion still applies, though.

To get back on your topic, I never used the words 'chiptune' or 'chip music' or such back in the day, I first heard it after I got back to the scene in 2005 or so, I guess. Doesn't narrow it down much for you, I know... hehe.

Maybe it came with all those BBStros in 92/93, made to be small files for sharing over slow modems? Maybe check some of those and read credits/scrolltexts ("chiptune by so-and-so...")

Hm, I may be wrong. It was invented by the group Magnetic Fields? One prod in 1992 could maybe be related, rest is from 1993 onwards.

Maybe the term was used early in the UK (or just by MF ) and it took 2-3 years before the term was widespread?
Photon is offline  
Old 22 August 2010, 21:39   #26
Skope
Protracker
 
Skope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 8364
Posts: 381
Whatever the definition is I don't agree with people using VSTi's and releasing mp3's calling them 'chiptunes'. Size efficient music (anything over 10k is pushing it) that's played in realtime on the HW intended is a chiptune, to me anyway. That whole bit-pop scene is something I quite never really understood.
Skope is offline  
Old 28 August 2010, 02:25   #27
CMDR
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brighton
Age: 34
Posts: 12
chipmusic: substance not style.
CMDR is offline  
Old 16 February 2011, 10:41   #28
TGM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leytonstone, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 39
Sorry to bring up an old thread... But talking of Chiptunes... http://www.chromeexperiments.com/det...iptunecom-gui/
TGM is offline  
Old 20 March 2011, 23:33   #29
r0ber7
it's all in your head
 
r0ber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 174
Might be interesting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12774683
r0ber7 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amiga specific hardware terms.... Paul_s Nostalgia & memories 36 14 October 2009 11:12
Wing Commander/Origin mai HOL contributions 11 26 February 2009 09:53
i want to make chipmusic on my amiga kodek New to Emulation or Amiga scene 7 07 May 2008 20:01
EA and Origin spiff Retrogaming General Discussion 3 28 March 2007 12:55

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:49.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.36869 seconds with 15 queries