01 April 2016, 13:49 | #61 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
|
|
01 April 2016, 14:21 | #62 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Age: 51
Posts: 1,297
|
I agree that if kick 3.1 is mandatory for a V500 it would become pretty pointless for many.
|
01 April 2016, 14:36 | #63 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
there is softkick option, remember the original cpu is no longer used. if it was to be mounted then you cannot use the ide header and the height would be too high to prob close the case, there will be some people that will not like this option. it is just the way it is
Last edited by kipper2k; 01 April 2016 at 15:05. |
01 April 2016, 15:32 | #64 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Age: 51
Posts: 1,297
|
Ok thanks for clearing that up. So it will be similar then to let's say softkick 1.3 on a 060 machine? Old kick, no extras but still with improved speed?
And are you saying you could still mount the 68k cpu if you do not use ide and leave the case open? Maybe this guy kipper2k will come up with some crazy adapter in such cases |
01 April 2016, 16:09 | #65 |
www.majsta.com
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Banjaluka/Republic of Srpska
Age: 43
Posts: 448
|
Again, let me repeat, this is FPGA and reason why something is slow or not compatible or even not supported can be fixed later easily like you have seen with core upgrades for V600. We have about 50% free space on FPGA so there is a lot of room left for some other options
|
01 April 2016, 17:21 | #66 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,924
|
I don't understand why anyone would want 1.3 with more than 68000 speed. I do understand that some people want 1.3 with exactly 68000 speed. But faster? Why? The software that won't run under 3.1 doesn't need more than 68000 speed.
|
01 April 2016, 17:58 | #67 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
i can understand mabbe using your a500 as a stock a500 and play those real old original disks that bang your floppy drive but most of them probably would not even work properly on a sped up 68000 cpu
|
01 April 2016, 18:36 | #68 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: finland
Posts: 1,841
|
Weren't there some flight simulators - OCS only - that could benefit from a faster 68000?
|
01 April 2016, 20:37 | #69 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I can imagine some people wanting an "original mode" where you get 1.3 AND a 7-ish Mhz 68k (real or FPGA) CPU for that original feel. That's what I have my A1000 for tho... I added some RAM and a CF hard drive, but it's 1.3 (or 1.1 or 1.2), and I've no plans for acceleration or higher kickstarts for him.. That's what my A1200 is for!!! ;-) So I'll wait for the 1200 Vampire version. And Kipper2K, take your time! I need to start putting a few bucks away every month for the 1200 version.. I'd hate for it to be released before I can buy it, and listen to everyone talking about how great it is, and I get stuck reading great reviews and watching youtube videos!!! AND... er.. um... I mean, I want to make sure YOU have plenty of time to deliver the quality you expect... So no rush at all!!! ;-) ;-) desiv |
|
01 April 2016, 20:57 | #70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scunthorpe/United Kingdom
Posts: 2,064
|
Also productivity software such as Sonix etc.
|
01 April 2016, 21:18 | #71 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
The only issue i have with the a1200 release (on my end) is the availability of the connectors, i have quite a lot of them but not enough (based on sales of the V600). I can get them made in the USA, but ithe price is high, that cost obviously will be passed on to the customer so if people can find a nice Chinese supplier let me know Last edited by kipper2k; 01 April 2016 at 21:30. |
|
01 April 2016, 21:31 | #72 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
On a silly side from someone who doesn't know.. Would it make more sense and even be possible to do a 1200 version that sits where the CPU sits like the 600 Vampire? I know it seems silly with that nice expansion port, but.. Just a thought... desiv |
|
01 April 2016, 21:48 | #73 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,970
|
Quote:
So if the V1200 ends up costing... say... $225 it's still a bloody good deal if you ask me. |
|
01 April 2016, 22:07 | #74 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
|
|
01 April 2016, 22:09 | #75 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
EDIT: By the way, I think it's great that all the Amiga flavours have the option for faster FPGAs and not just the A1200. The A1200 gets all the best toys! Last edited by clebin; 01 April 2016 at 22:17. |
|
02 April 2016, 00:19 | #76 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,970
|
Quote:
The piggy back models have other design limitations simply because you need to place them in a very specific place, they must not block certain parts of the mobo and you want to secure them in a way that's doable with existing holes in the motherboard. First of all, a piggy back design for the A1200 would be very hard because the 020 is placed awkwardly close to the edge of the motherboard (and at the narrow end). http://www.bigbookofamigahardware.co...0mb_rev1d4.jpg Secondly, if the propriety connectors were *impossible* to acquire then maybe someone would do a wired piggy-back socket extender in some awkward manner, but as it is, its an unnecessary and well... stupid, I guess.. thing to do ;-) |
|
02 April 2016, 02:25 | #77 |
mä vaan
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,671
|
My point of view, ethernet is mandatory. I couldn't imagine "high tech" amiga without that. I makes life so much easier and gives losts of options.
I'm interested A500 version mostly because of CDTV. It would make CDTV the ultimate Amiga / whdload / gaming machine. CDTV is only "wife approved" amiga to living room. How about CPU adapter like this http://www.toddfun.com/blog/wp-conte...keyboard-1.jpg It would remove need of extra headers, no pressure to CPU socket, allow putting Vampire to any Place. |
02 April 2016, 03:15 | #78 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
|
|
02 April 2016, 12:09 | #79 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: France
Posts: 82
|
Maybe a silly question, will the Vampire 500 be compatible with A500+ ?
|
02 April 2016, 13:13 | #80 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Canada
Posts: 4,323
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vampire II for the Amiga 600 FAQ's | kipper2k | support.Hardware | 509 | 06 October 2019 14:15 |
Vampire 500 project started | majsta | Hardware mods | 221 | 17 August 2016 18:42 |
Amiga Shops Still Alive? | Dr.Mabuse | MarketPlace | 27 | 21 February 2013 17:18 |
Amiga is alive and well in PORTUGAL | paulo_becas | Member Introductions | 5 | 04 February 2010 17:01 |
Is Amiga Alive Dead? | AmigaEd | Amiga scene | 5 | 12 June 2005 19:51 |
|
|