09 December 2014, 19:32 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
Best Commodore 4000 Monitor?
What is the best Commodore 4000 Monitor? Thanks
|
09 December 2014, 20:05 | #2 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,882
|
The 1960
|
10 December 2014, 02:26 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
What's the 1940 like compared to the 1960 monitor?
|
10 December 2014, 06:29 | #4 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,882
|
Terrible..
Oh, reasoning.. yes.. - no two amiga screen modes use the same adjustments so you will spend a lot of time twiddling the knobs - unsharp dot pitch |
10 December 2014, 07:07 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
On a website I read, it said that the 1940 Monitor is Compatible with the Amiga 1200 and 4000.
|
10 December 2014, 08:01 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 3,773
|
You haven't specified what sort of monitor you need. If only 15khz is required, you can't beat a flat screen Trinitron.
If a multisync monitor is required I believe the NEC Multisync monitors are highly regarded. I personally wouldn't touch any Commodore monitor with a barge pole. They're old and clapped out, they're far too small, and the CRT's are curved. |
10 December 2014, 11:25 | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Cambs / UK
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
|
|
10 December 2014, 13:28 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
Just a monitor that will work well with the Amiga 4000 components.
|
10 December 2014, 13:50 | #9 |
Supernormal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
Age: 43
Posts: 1,415
|
I guess M1438S is the best monitor for AGA Amigas (1200 and 4000 are very similar) since it can display resolutions up to 1024x768. (although AGA becomes very slow at that resolution. 800x600 on the other hand is great and fast with a fast Amiga and it has very little flickering that is hard to notice)
There is also the M1764 which is the bigger brother of M1438S with more features, but there is no possibility of finding one (I have been looking for one since 2004 and was prepared to pay up to 300€ for it until I realized that shipping such a monitor to Turkey would cost a fortune) so M1438S should be the best. I guess you can find one of these being sold once a year. |
10 December 2014, 13:51 | #10 |
Workbitch 1.3
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,084
|
|
10 December 2014, 13:59 | #11 |
Workbitch 1.3
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,084
|
|
10 December 2014, 14:13 | #12 | |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,882
|
Quote:
I added the bits in square brackets myself and adjusted the word order a bit. I had to guess since you didn't form a complete sentence. I hated my 1942. I was so happy to see it go. I even got some money for it, yay. |
|
10 December 2014, 14:24 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Cambs / UK
Posts: 356
|
The 1084S is sufficient for my A1200 needs. Mind you I have no other monitors to compare it with. I do know it isn't much good for high resolutions needed for web browsing etc.
EDIT: My 1084S is different from the one above. |
10 December 2014, 14:51 | #14 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,882
|
The 1084/8833 is a fine monitor for PAL/NTSC use. And let's be honest, the rest of the AGA modes are so slow that it's best to just forget them anyway. :-)
If bigger resolutions are needed, it's best to get a flicker fixer + VGA monitor and run an interlaced 15kHz mode.. |
10 December 2014, 14:52 | #15 | |
Supernormal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
Age: 43
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
|
|
10 December 2014, 14:58 | #17 |
Italian Amiga Zealot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 1,913
|
I have an amazing Multisync Microvitec 1548 at home. Excellent monitor.
Too bad it goes purple after 5-10 minutes |
10 December 2014, 15:09 | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
So if I had a choice to buy a 1960 Monitor or a 1940 Monitor for an Amiga 4000 and chose the 1940, what differences would I notice when I'm using Video Toaster, Personal Paint and playing Games.
|
10 December 2014, 17:20 | #19 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,882
|
If you use anything but the PAL screenmode, you'd notice yourself adjusting all the size + position knobs all the time on the 1940.
Why not get a 1084S instead and stick to PAL. They can be had for less money and effort. |
10 December 2014, 22:35 | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cornwall, England
Posts: 313
|
Thanks. Does the Multisync on the 1960 Monitor solve the problem of adjusting knobs for the size and position of the display. Also, why was the 1940 Monitor released in 1993 2 years after the 1960 Monitor (1991) when it's Bysync, less advanced than Multisync.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commodore monitor or TV? | endre1952 | support.Hardware | 3 | 29 April 2012 08:06 |
Commodore monitor | Seblington | MarketPlace | 1 | 19 August 2011 18:17 |
FS: Amiga 4000 030 with 1960 Monitor | Retro-mania | MarketPlace | 7 | 14 October 2007 17:52 |
Commodore PC monitor with amiga 4000 | Dizzy | support.Hardware | 0 | 01 February 2006 18:35 |
Amiga 4000/40 with monitor on ebay | sturme | MarketPlace | 2 | 14 September 2002 19:28 |
|
|