English Amiga Board - View Single Post - PFS vs SFS vs FFS

nikosidis · 26 April 2020, 12:47

I see some strange advice here. Why are people recommending FFS? It is nothing close to SFS or PFS3. 
The great thing about PFS3 is that it work with with any Amiga while SFS require at least 020. 
FFS have the known forever validation error on real Amigas, is very slow and not reliable. 
I would never use FFS for my system partition. That is the partition you should not use it. 
PFS3 I never had a single problem with. That is using my Amiga almost every day. 
 
Installing PFS3 on real amiga boot from Amiga911.adf I can put it in the zone if you like. I have used it for my A1200 and A600 without problems. I have 3 partitions. System partition is around 4GB and other partitions are 7GB and 3GB. OS is 3.1

26 April 2020, 12:47	#55
nikosidis Registered User Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: oslo/norway Posts: 1,607	I see some strange advice here. Why are people recommending FFS? It is nothing close to SFS or PFS3. <br /><br /> The great thing about PFS3 is that it work with with any Amiga while SFS require at least 020.<br /><br /> FFS have the known forever validation error on real Amigas, is very slow and not reliable.<br /><br /> I would never use FFS for my system partition. That is the partition you should not use it.<br /><br /> PFS3 I never had a single problem with. That is using my Amiga almost every day.<br /> <br /> Installing PFS3 on real amiga boot from Amiga911.adf I can put it in the zone if you like. I have used it for my A1200 and A600 without problems. I have 3 partitions. System partition is around 4GB and other partitions are 7GB and 3GB. OS is 3.1 Last edited by nikosidis; 26 April 2020 at 12:55.