View Single Post
Old 16 October 2019, 18:34   #18
meynaf
son of 68k
meynaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lyon / France
Age: 46
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmigaHope View Post
Let's say we found a workable tech that could clock to 100Ghz with minimal heat generation, but with the caveat that gate density was nowhere as good as our current silicon designs. It might require a much simpler architecture, losing a lot of the advancements we've made in instruction decoding. Code might have to go to a fully orthagonal RISC instruction set with a very limited set of instructions. Removing other features might cause IPC to go down considerably, but since the damn thing is running at 100Ghz it's still many times faster than what we have today.
I don't see the point in having a design that will spend all its time waiting on the memory interface. As if you don't have space for a good enough decoder, you also don't have space for a decent onchip cache.
meynaf is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04271 seconds with 11 queries