Quote:
Originally Posted by duga
Why would anyone buy it only to make it open source?
|
Not speaking for IComp, but perhaps they wanted some legal assurances for embracing and extending and eventually releasing new products based on it. That doesn't necessarily preclude them from releasing the source but still charging for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanujan
Do you know who did the unofficial fixes, and what exactly was fixed?
|
No I'm not sure what all they included or where they came from, I think some was from Amithlon, some from OpenPCI project.
http://lilliput.amiga-projects.net/Picasso96.htm
This was included at some point:
http://aminet.net/package/driver/video/RTG403994p
There are a couple other fixes I can think of for P96 that I don't know whether are in 2.2 or not but appear to be in 2.1e. Also bugs in 2.1e but that's what makes it unofficial, right? RIGHT?