View Single Post
Old 19 April 2017, 10:47   #89
grond
Banned

 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schoenfeld View Post
I am evaluating the possibility. In essence, we need to make sure that commercial projects based on P96 (such as OS4 and another, not yet disclosed project) are still possible.
Why should there be a problem? I do software license compatibility checks in my work. The GPL is not infective (the infamous "copyleft effect") as long as you are linking dynamically (otherwise you couldn't run ANY closed-source software on a Linux system because of the glibc).

Dynamic linking is the absolute norm for Amiga software. I don't see why a card driver interfacing the P96 core or a program calling rtg-functions should be at the risk of being infected by the GPL. This is all dynamically linked.

Quote:
This comes down to releasing P96 under two licenses, and by that, creating two forks; one open-source that no commercial developer should look at in order not to "infect" the commercial code he's writing, and another open-source fork that does not have anyone "in charge".
Sounds like selling the cake and still have it...
Quote:
Badmouthing does not help. Especially not your own reputation.
If you read more carefully, you'd notice that I said something positive about you.
grond is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.07936 seconds with 11 queries