Quote:
Originally Posted by ExiE
Wrong. You can compare speed of the GUI, but that's it. Ibrowse is faster, coz it basically ignores 4/5 of the page code. Rendering CSS/HTML5 code is much more complex and power consuming.
|
Can't test Netsurf on my A1200 right now because I uninstalled it. However I downloaded the amiga.org page to a local folder on my PC using Firefox, and removed all css from the html file. Results:-
Netsurf with css: "done(4.8s)"
Netsurf no css: "done(4.6s)"
Firefox no css: < 1s
So the official Windows version of Netsurf is slow even
without the "much more complex and power consuming" overhead of css.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by utri007
Netsurf is 2x faster than fork you tried.
|
So still 4 times slower than IBrowse.
How can I get this 'real' Netsurf working on my A1200 with WB3.1?