View Single Post
Old 27 January 2020, 10:27   #3
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 748
Originally Posted by roondar View Post
I don't think warning for "pauses" is truly viable.
I think what Kamelito's asking for here is for the assembler to warn when the scheduling of consecutive instructions is suboptimal for the target CPU (i.e. hazards and bubbles), rather than anything related to the actual logic of the program?
robinsonb5 is offline  
Page generated in 0.04205 seconds with 11 queries