View Single Post
Old 27 January 2020, 10:27   #3
robinsonb5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by roondar View Post
I don't think warning for "pauses" is truly viable.
I think what Kamelito's asking for here is for the assembler to warn when the scheduling of consecutive instructions is suboptimal for the target CPU (i.e. hazards and bubbles), rather than anything related to the actual logic of the program?
robinsonb5 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04205 seconds with 11 queries