Seriously, does anyone today doubt the substantial advantage technically speaking of a Falcon compared to that of an A1200?
We are not talking about the software that obviously the Amiga, both in operating system and in quantity of software destroys it, but technically? Really someone here thinks that an A1200 stock was better technically than a stock Falcon?
I thought the people of EAB had more knowledge about their machine.
An Acorn Archimedes 3010 is better technically than an Amiga too, but obviously, no one compares them because it has almost no software. The Falcon is the same, more powerful, but without software. End of discussion.
Someone let me know when a stock A1200 can do this as a stock Falcon.
[ Show youtube player ]
And Someone let me know when a stock A1200 can do this as a stock Arquimedes.
[ Show youtube player ]
Amiga rules! but inform you before you speak.