View Single Post
Old 28 October 2016, 11:03   #29
roondar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlfrsilver View Post
Yes in many cases. But this was political. There was no reason back in the day for such rubbish games backported.
I'd disagree with this statement. Your statement assumes that people out to make money by selling software deliberately made their stuff suck just because they liked another computer better. Which, to me, feels like a very strange thing to say.

So let me offer an alternative take:

It takes a lot of time, effort and hence money to make a great port. Just like the ST ports to the Amiga of the time, developers might just have chosen the cheap route because they could sell the results anyway. That's not politically motivated, thats pure capitalism in action

(and yes, it sucks these things happen but there is no conspiracy there - just cash talking)

Now for something more on-topic:
This looks like a wonderful port!

The only thing I'd personally change is how the ball looks (it looks nice, but I don't really like the black outline). That is, however, a giant pile of nitpicking as the game does look great
roondar is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04209 seconds with 11 queries