View Single Post
Old 18 January 2012, 12:41   #6
Ratte
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishyfish View Post
Just curious though, and I dont want to be negative towards your work, but is there much likelyhood of those few functions (writepixelarray in particular is pretty important for me) that dont do as well as with powerfb being sped up still?
Also what cards are supported? Is it specifically the radeon9250?
Also does using an openpci driver remove the graphics ram limit that's normally there with amithlon?
A lot of functions are still software emulated.
Most of them are slower than powerfb, because powerfb is using x86 code for emulating and not 68k like i did.
Generally it is a framebuffer with "some" functions accelerated by hardware, some blitter and sprite functions.
Target is a full accelerated driver in the future.

RAM limit is gone, but due to a bug i have to limit the driver to 64mb, but the problem is no longer and 256mb videomem is no problem.

Currently supported are R200-RV280 chipsets.
Code is written to support a wide range from r100-r500 series in the future.
But I still have to transfer a lot of linux/bsd-code.
Ratte is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04399 seconds with 11 queries