View Single Post
Old 25 June 2011, 00:47   #169
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hangover
Posts: 1,671
It's not such a big drawback using the 68000 version as you might think. It's only 1-2% slower as the 68020 version but still about 20% faster than the WarpPNG.datatype. At least for icons, because the png.datatype has much less overhead which is better for small files.
PeterK is offline  
Page generated in 0.04878 seconds with 9 queries