View Single Post
Old 25 June 2011, 00:47   #169
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hangover
Posts: 2,233
It's not such a big drawback using the 68000 version as you might think. It's only 1-2% slower as the 68020 version but still about 20% faster than the WarpPNG.datatype. At least for icons, because the png.datatype has much less overhead which is better for small files.
PeterK is offline  
Page generated in 0.03924 seconds with 10 queries