Thread: DMS vs. ADF
View Single Post
Old 16 October 2001, 17:35   #29
|cy[ool
Strange Days
|cy[ool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne/Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 147
Ok, just to make a few points crystal clear here..

*Codys & my disks didn't 'go' bad..they were created badly.

*Tosec & dats are for cataloguing only and bear no influence on whether the images they catalog are for emulation or the real thing, it also brings new images to the 'real' users as no such system exists on Amiga.

*To image a disk 'readdisk dfx: image.name'
*To write an image to disk 'writedisk image.name dfx:'

As previously stated, i use ADF instead of DMS on my real Amiga's.. nothing to do with emulation.

Its your perogative to use a potentially faulty product, and if you have problems of corrupt disks and don't do what CodeT does with comparing disks, its no fault but your own.
|cy[ool is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.05685 seconds with 9 queries